540 likes | 732 Views
Conditional Grant Business Plan Training Process. National Treasury August 2007 DAY - ONE Technical Assistance Unit. Objectives. Understanding of broad policy framework governing Conditional Grants Understand alignment of Budget Cycle and Conditional Grant Cycle
E N D
Conditional Grant Business Plan Training Process National Treasury August 2007 DAY - ONE Technical Assistance Unit
Objectives • Understanding of broad policy framework governing Conditional Grants • Understand alignment of Budget Cycle and Conditional Grant Cycle • Understand the application and use of the RBM in the preparation of business plans • Develop business plans (draft) as a learning process
Two Day Agenda • DAY One • DORA requirements • Budget cycle, Conditional Grant Cycle and Alignment Model (where relevant) • Introduction to RBM concepts and terminology • DAY two • Develop business plans as a learning process focusing on: • Logic model – Grant Profile • Performance Measurement Framework • Risk Management Plan
Learning approach Lectures To share essential concepts. Group Exercises Learn by doing – test our ability to apply our knowledge to the development of actual business plans Discussions To link concepts to participants needs, build on participants experience and offer the opportunity to develop a support network. Readings Reference materials (documents and websites) will be made available to participants to pursue individual learning interests. Feedback This is your workshop. We would appreciate feedback so that we can better meet your interests and needs.
Rules of Engagement • Be open to share experience, ideas, opinions • Respect ideas, opinions • Don’t be afraid to ask questions. We will either • Answer it • Park it • Refer it to the group • Research it and answer it later, in group or off-line
ALIGNMENT OF THE BUDGET CYCLE, CONDITIONAL GRANT CYCLE AND THE INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY CYCLE
MTEF Budget Preparation Cycle and Conditional Grant Planning Processes Budget Preparation Cycle 31 Aug Mid Feb Mid Dec Update Budget Draft Budget Final Budget Budget Alloc Letter 10 x 10 MTEC MinComBud Cabinet MTBPS Budget Day Conditional Grant Planning Processes APPROVAL 1st draft of Business Plan for next year Updated Business Plan for next year Finalising the Grant Framework for DoRA Requirements Legend: Input into Budget Process Linkages
Alignment of the MTEF Budget Cycle and the Conditional Grant Cycle Implement Budget Draft Budget Update Budget Final Budget AFS AR Draft Budget Update Budget Final Budget Implement Budget AFS Implement Budget Draft Budget Update Budget Final Budget Grant Initiation Grant Formulation & Approval Level 1 Approval: CG approved for coming yr Implementa-tion Planning Year 1: Implementation, Monitoring & Reporting Business Plan for Year 2 Year 2: Implementation, Monitoring & Reporting Business Plan for Year 3 Legend: Input into Budget Process Linkages Budget Allocation
In the case where a Conditional Grant contains infrastructure the Infrastructure Delivery Cycle must be taken into consideration Implement Budget Draft Budget Update Budget Final Budget AFS AR Draft Budget Update Budget Final Budget Implement Budget AFS Implement Budget Draft Budget Update Budget Final Budget Grant Initiation Grant Formulation & Approval Level 1 Approval: CG approved for coming yr Implementa-tion Planning Year 1: Implementation, Monitoring & Reporting Business Plan for Year 2 Year 2: Implementation, Monitoring & Reporting Business Plan for Year 3 Project Implementation Infrastructure Planning Programme Design Project Design Project Tender Legend: Input into Budget Process Linkages Budget Allocation
INTRODUCTION TO RESULTS BASED MANAGEMENT OR PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT
Some Key Questions • How does the cumulative impact of long term initiatives get measured and reported? • What is the contribution of the work being done in terms of the strategic goal? • How can progress be measured and reported? • Who needs to get such reports? • Is government getting value for its money? • How can interdependencies be managed? • Can a shared understanding of service delivery be generated?
What is Results-based Management • Is a comprehensive approach to public management based on a client\taxpayer\citizen-centred view • It focuses on external results (outcomes) rather than on internal processes to drive change • It integrates strategy resources, performance, measurement, learning and adjusting to improve decision making • Results information is used for learning and decisions making as well as reporting and accountability
Why results-based management (2) • The expected benefits are better responses to client\taxpayer\citizen expectations, particularly with regard to value for money • It puts considerable emphasis on defining and achieving results and development and improvement • It facilitates an integrated and coherent approach to public management with improved accountability • Management for results and not by results – is the key through arrangement of resources to achieve the outcomes
RBM Elements & Solutions • Results Based Management assists in setting the stage to answer these and other questions • Key elements include; • The building in of a useful approach from the beginning of the strategic process; • A focus on the results to be achieved; and • Ongoing and continuous management over time and up and down the public sector hierarchy.
Importance in SA? • Government Wide Monitoring and Evaluation System (GWM&E) • Framework for Managing Programme Performance Information (PIF) • Both initiatives are using RBM principles, emphasis is on: • Accountability and achieving results • Meeting stakeholder expectations • Ensuring Value for money
RBM Cycle ProgrammeManagement Influence and Project Management NT TAU
RBMManagement Framework Impact Manage/influence to achieve these Outcomes (change in behaviour) Outputs Project Manage & Budget for these Activities Inputs (deliverables)
RBMPerformance Framework Impact Indicator There need to be indicators of performance at all levels Outcomes Indicator Outputs Indicator Activities Indicator Inputs Indicator
RMBLogical Framework Impact Assumptions Outcomes Assumptions Outputs Assumptions Assumptions hold true Activities THEN AND Inputs IF
Managing for Results - Principles • Focus the dialogue on results at all phases of the (Programmes & Projects) development process • Align programming, monitoring, and evaluation with results • Keep results measurement and reporting as simple, cost-effective, and user friendly as possible • Manage for, not by, results, by arranging resources to achieve outcomes • Use results information for learning and decision making as well as reporting and accountability
Moving from a Focus on Outputs to a Focus on Outcomes How we know how well are we doing WHY? WHAT ? HOW ? WHO? INPUT ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS REACH OUTCOMES What we wish to achieve What we use to do the work What we produce Who we impact What we do Previous Focus New Focus
Results-Based Management:Linking Programmes to Strategic Objectives • Emphasises strategic alignment of effort towards results objectives – linking programmes to strategic objectives Strategic Plan Operational Planning Process Reporting Process Planning Process Operational Plan Unit Work Plan Employee Work Plan
Focusing on Results helps… • Departments to understand the difference made by their programmes to the communities they serve • Departments have increased transparency and accountability • Departments to better allocate resources and better design/adapt programmes and services to the needs of the people • Using RBM as a management tool, • Department will be in a position to learn and improve their programmes and service delivery
Some tools ‘assimilated’ by RBM • Plans • State of the Nation address, Budget speech • Department's strategic plans and operational plans • Performance measurement/monitoring systems • GWM&E • PIF • Control system • Performance audit • HR engagement and accountability • Performance agreements • Published public service standards (Batho Pele) • Programme/Project Design • Logic model (results chain); Logical Analysis Framework (logframe); • Results based management frameworks • Risk based and audit framework
What you need to focus on!!! Change management Risk management Performance management and reporting
Benefits of good change management New level of performance Performance Change Old level of performance Initial impact of change is a decrease in productivity. Time Change Management Necessary to minimise negative impact due to transition
Why manage risk? Fundamental responsibility of (public service) management! • Management decisions are generally made in a context of uncertainty. • RBM emphasis on accountability in the pursuit of results requires a thorough identification and understanding of risk in order to have the appropriate control system in place. • A proactive stance in risk management not only minimises probability and incidence of undesirable events, it also fosters innovation. • ‘Risk is no longer something to be faced; risk has become a set of opportunities open to choice.’ Peter L. Bernstein, Against the Gods
RBM and Risk Risk is the uncertainty that surrounds future events & outcomes. It is a function of the probability and the impact of an event that has the potential to (negatively) influence the realisation of the organisation’s expected results. Risk increases over time, as, in a dynamic environment, numerous variables come into play, many not under any one individual or organisation’s control. Source: CIDA web site
Performance measurement Is all about… • Why does the project, programme exist? • What do we want to accomplish? • How are going to deliver the programme? • How will we know how well we are doing? • What changes do we make to improve the delivery of the programme?
Who is reached Input Activity Output Outcome What we use to do the work What outcomes & impact we wish to achieve. What we do What we produce Who Benefits Performance Measures Project Framework Typical Focus RBM Focus Indicators, baselines and targets
The RBM cycle – Not a linear sequence! Commit feedback, adjust Implement Control feedback, adjust Report feedback, adjust Improve
Activities vs. Outputs vs. Outcomes In summary, every Program undertakes Activities that produce Outputsthat contribute to the achievement of Outcomes.
Examples of Activities Activities “what we do” Describes a collection of functions (actions, jobs, tasks) that consume inputs/resources and whose outputs deliver benefits/impacts to a client. • Conduct research • Publish documents • Provide advice • Contract for services • Respond to enquiries • Draft the business plan • Organize Committee meetings • Organize Committee travel Note that Activities contain verbs
Examples of Outputs Outputs“what we produce” The direct products and services generated through processes or activities without specific reference to their ultimate purpose. • Research papers • Advice and direction • Service providers obtained and work initiated • Business plan • Committee reports Note that Outputs contain nouns
Examples of Outcomes Outcomes“why we do it” The effects, benefits or consequences (impacts) that occur (either in the short, intermediate, or long-term) due to the outputs of programs, processes or activities. • A secure work environment • Electronic accessibility and equality • Sound management practices (accountability and reporting framework, people management, internal communications, technology support) • Representative workforce • Note that Outcomes refer to a changed state of beingandare stated in the present tense.
Key Issues to consider when identifying outcomes • Are there stated national /sectoral goals • Have political promises been made that specify improved performance of the government • Do citizens, polling data indicate specific concerns • Is authorizing legislation present • Other; Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), PoA Objectives
Indicators, Standards/Targets • Indicators ( The “How”) A quantitative or qualitative attribute, statistic or parameter that, tracked over time, provides information on the condition of a phenomenon. (e.g. percentage of clients that are satisfied). • Standards/Targets (The “How Much”) Specific quantitative or qualitative goals associated with specific performance indicators (e.g. 90% client satisfaction). • Standards imply product and service levels to which an organization is prepared to commit. • Targets imply a desired goal that may be more ambitious than a standard. In summary, Indicators, Standards and Targets are used to provide information on how efficiently and effectively the Program is being managed.
Examples of Indicators Indicators“the how” A quantitative or qualitative attribute, statistic or parameter that, tracked over time, provides information on the condition of a phenomenon • Cost per unit published • % of total workforce leaving the organization • Time (hours) to respond to a request for service • Level of satisfaction of service users/ providers
Examples of Standards/Targets Standards/Targets (the “How Much”) Specific quantitative or qualitative goals against which actualoutputs or outcomes will be compared • 60% of South Africans are aware of housing subsidies opportunities • Training cost per new employee is $2,000 • 85% of workforce is satisfied with working conditions, quality of life • 99% availability of IT networks
Results Chain RESULTS High Control Low Influence STRATEGIC OUTCOMES OUTCOMES (FINAL) OUTCOMES (INTERMEDIATE) INPUTS (RESOURCES) ACTIVITIES OUTPUTS OUTCOMES (IMMEDIATE) • A Results Chain can include multiple inputs, activities, outputs or outcomes. There are two types of Results: Outputs and Outcomes.
Exercise Number 3 Identifying indicators related to the Logic Model
Brief Summary • RBM goes beyond the work we do – it interrogates the impact this has. • There is a hierarchical relationship between outputs and outcomes. • Each level of this logic must and can be measured. • Measurements used for management and reporting. • Indicators are not the same up the hierarchy.