230 likes | 243 Views
This review compares the effectiveness of different target load methods in watershed and estuarine delivery to guide load distribution strategies. The study analyzes various options and their impact on water quality goals.
E N D
Methodology to Distribute Target Loads Principals’ Staff Committee 10/23/2009 Bob Koroncai - Gary Shenk
Relative Effectiveness is a combination of Watershed Delivery and Estuarine Delivery Low Delivery || \/ High Delivery Potomac Estuarine Effectiveness James Estuarine Effectiveness
10% 20% 34% 69% 73% 81% 100% 100%
Review of Target Load Method from April 2 2 2 2 2
How Many lines? Note: Basin-Jurisdictions have single target load no matter how many lines
Preferences of WQGIT Number: 2 lines, WWTP and all else Shape: Open to all WWTP: Set WWTP at a high level and meet water quality goals with other loads Slope: 20% Considered 5 options and reached a unanimous recommendation to forward the 2 following options
4.5 mg/l 8 mg/l 20 percent slope Option A
4.5 mg/l 8 mg/l 20 percent slope Option B
0.22 mg/l 0.53 mg/l Option A 20 percent slope
0.22 mg/l 0.53 mg/l Option B 20 percent slope
Decision Requested . . .after lunch • Does the PSC prefer option A or option B as the initial working target loads for the purpose of starting the watershed implementation planning?