1 / 13

EPSS

EPSS. On-line Off-line. EPSS CD-Rom Diskette. Paper version. Paper version. Two adresses : mail = Hand delivery-Private courrier services = FP6-Research Proposals FP6-Research Proposals (Call identifier………) (Call identifier………) European Commission European Commission

arvin
Download Presentation

EPSS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. EPSS On-line Off-line EPSS CD-Rom Diskette Paper version Paper version Two adresses : mail = Hand delivery-Private courrier services = FP6-Research Proposals FP6-Research Proposals (Call identifier………) (Call identifier………) European Commission European Commission B-1049 Brussels rue de Genève 1 B-1140 Brussels

  2. Cases of non elligibility • Proposals arriving after the date and time specified in the call concerned will be excluded. • Proposals not satisfying the conditions relating to the minimum of participants indicated in the call concerned will be excluded. • In case of successive submissions of the same proposal for an indirect RTD action, the Commission will examine the last version received before the closure date. • If the same proposal is submitted in paper and electronic format, the Commission will only examine the text submitted under the electronic format. • Proposals submitted by email or by fax will be excluded.

  3. Specific cases submitted to the Commission • At the end of each closure of proposals EPSS send a report explaining the • problems met. During the last call TI-3-Main, we had the following cases to solve : • Proposal submitted in wrong call • Proposals submitted on-line but the coordinator oversight to press the submit button • The coordinator had no time to upload the different parts of the proposal in the system for different reasons and sent them by email after the closure time • They change the content of the proposal just before the closure time and had no time to upload the new version and sent it by email. • On 12 cases presented, 5 have been accepted by a committee of eligibility composed of 2 lawyers of the Commission, an expert in EPSS knowing the different situations and the system, and the call coordinator.

  4. EVALUATION 2004 TI-3-Main: All Proposals Subdivided in 423 STREP 32 CA 38 SSA 493 PROPOSALS EVALUATED 499 PROPOSALS RECEIVED In 17 GROUPS 1 transferred to Science & society 1 duplicate 4 non eligible By 185 Experts 316 PROPOSALS Were submitted electronically Representing 63 % Budget : 1.06 B€ 12-05-04 06-06-04 07-06-04 12-06-04

  5. Budget Scenario - TI Received Eligible Indicative Budget Selected 1,056 1,047 1out of 5 M€ 493 prop 4536 partners M€ 499 prop 4572 partners 2.3 M€/prop. 105M€ 60 proposals 9 part/prop. 120 M€ 1 out of 8 07/06/04 12/05/04

  6. The second stage proposals are currently being evaluated Two IP proposals with Greek coordinators have passed (AERONAO -Konstadopoulos and Galiotis). There are no data for the partners (they are not mentioned in the first stage) Final results for STREPS (and possibly for NI) will be announced on July 20th New Instruments (NI)

More Related