1 / 25

2005-06 Special Education Focused Monitoring Rollout

2005-06 Special Education Focused Monitoring Rollout. September 14 th , 2005. IDEA 2004: APR/SPP Requirement. SPP – State Performance Plan 6- year plan that describes how the state will improve the implementation of IDEA in 19 key areas. APR – Annual Performance Report

atira
Download Presentation

2005-06 Special Education Focused Monitoring Rollout

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2005-06Special EducationFocused MonitoringRollout September 14th, 2005

  2. IDEA 2004: APR/SPP Requirement • SPP – State Performance Plan 6- year plan that describes how the state will improve the implementation of IDEA in 19 key areas. • APR – Annual Performance Report Annual report on progress on the performance targets set for each of the 19 key areas. State shall use the targets in the SPP to analyze the performance of each LEA in the State. State shall report annually to the public on the performance of each LEA in the State on the SPP targets.

  3. IDEA 2004 • OSEP’s Monitoring Priorities: • FAPE in the LRE • Effective General Supervision • Disproportionality • 19 APR/SPP Indicators in 6 areas:

  4. Disproportionality Districts Manchester Norwalk Windham Windsor LRE Districts East Hartford Killingly Plymouth Sterling Voluntown South Windsor (exemplar) Update on 2004-05 Monitoring

  5. Focused Monitoring Activities

  6. LRE Indicators • % of All K-12 Students with Disabilities in the 0-40% TWNDP • Mean TWNDP for All In-District K-12 Students with Disabilities • Mean TWNDP for All Pre-K (non-itinerant) Students with Disabilities (dropping for 05-06) • % of All Pre-K (non-itinerant) Students with Disabilities in the 0-40% TWNDP (new for 05-06)

  7. % of All K-12 Students with Disabilities in the 0-40% TWNDP • State Average in 2003-04 = 18.6% • State Average in 2004-05 = 16.2% • Cut Point for RED = Greater than 16.0% • 2003-04 = 55 Red Districts • 2004-05 = 37 Red Districts

  8. Mean TWNDP for All In-District K-12 Students with Disabilities • State Average in 2003-04 = 74.7% • State Average in 2004-05 = 77.0% • Cut Point for RED = Less than 75.0% • 2003-04 = 50 Red Districts • 2004-05 = 28 Red Districts

  9. Mean TWNDP for All Pre-K (non-itinerant) Students with Disabilities • State Average in 2003-04 = 66.6% • State Average in 2004-05 = 69.5% • Cut Point for RED = Less than 50.0% • 2003-04 = 34 Red Districts • 2004-05 = 24 Red Districts Dropping

  10. NEW NEW % of All Pre-K (non-itinerant) SWD in the 0-40% TWNDP • State Average in 2003-04 = 28.0% • State Average in 2004-05 = 25.9% • Cut Point for RED = Greater than 50.0% • Cut Point for YELLOW = 10.0% to 50.0% • 2004-05 = 22 Red Districts & 50 Yellow Districts

  11. Disproportionality Indicators • Overrepresentation of Students with Disabilities by Race/Ethnicity • Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities (dropping for 05-06) • Suspension/Expulsion Rates for Students with Disabilities (new for 05-06)

  12. Overrepresentation of Students with Disabilities by Race/Ethnicity • Red = Statistically Significant in 3-4 areas • Yellow = Statistically Significant in 1-2 areas or High Odds Ratio • 2003-04 = 18 Red Districts 7 Yellow Districts • 2004-05 = 8 Red Districts 14 Yellow Districts

  13. Graduation Rate for Students with Disabilities (Grades 9-12) • State Average in 2002-03 = 61.8% • State Average in 2003-04 = 63.0% • Cut Point for RED = Less than 50.0% • 2003-04 = 22 Red Districts • 2004-05 = 10 Red Districts Dropping

  14. NEW NEW Suspension/Expulsion Rates for Students with Disabilities • Cut Point for RED = High in either OSS Incidence Difference Score or Special Education OSS Suspension Rate • Cut Point for YELLOW = High in either Special Education OSS Incidence Rate or 10+ Day Suspension Rate • 2003-04 = 26 Red Districts & 21 Yellow Districts

  15. Great News!!! • 37 Districts are GREEN on All 5 Focused Monitoring Indicators • 40 Districts are GREEN on All 3 LRE Indicators • 113 Districts are GREEN on Both (2) Overrepresentation Indicators

  16. Disproportionality Districts Bridgeport Hartford New Britain Stamford LRE Districts TBD FYI: 2005-06 Monitoring

  17. Questions??? Focused Monitoring: Deborah Richards 860-713-6925 Special Education Data: Diane Murphy 860-713-6891 F.M. Data Maps: Heather Levitt Doucette 860-713-6867

More Related