160 likes | 271 Views
Special Education Monitoring. November 8, 2012 Event # 15755. Agenda. RF Tracker Nonpublic Placements Monitoring Activities Monitoring findings Comparable services Intensive programs of instruction. RF Tracker.
E N D
Special Education Monitoring November 8, 2012 Event # 15755
Agenda • RF Tracker • Nonpublic Placements • Monitoring Activities • Monitoring findings • Comparable services • Intensive programs of instruction
RF Tracker • Initial entry of RF Tracker data is to be completed by this Friday, Nov. 9. • A review of Tracker data will be conducted to determine if all RF LEAs have entered data. • Students who rolled over from last year, but left the RF before school began should have been deleted. • New students should have been entered with start of school or enrollment event.
(RF Tracker) • Students who have left RF should have been withdrawn. • All student data should match what is in the IEP. • Facility data should have been updated. RF Tracker will remain open for LEAs to continue to enter and withdraw students. Words to remember: Data Integrity
SPP Noncompliance CAP • If LEA is staged for interventions, the corrective action plan, that will include strategies for correcting the SPP noncompliance, will be submitted at same time as other intervention submissions. • If not in a stage of intervention or LEA not required to submit documents, CAP due by 5:00 on December 7.
Monitoring Activities • LEAs who were staged should be involved in the intervention process—either for a single program area or integrated programs. • Process---not just requirements. • Not what TEA wants, but what the LEA needs to do to make improvement.
Monitoring FindingsComparable Services 34 CFR 300.323(e)(f) For students transferring into a public agencies, the new public agency must: • In consultation with parent
Provide FAPE to the child, including services comparable to those described in the child’s IEP from the previous public agency, until the new public agency either: • Adopts the child’s IEP from the previous LEA; or • Develops, adopts, and implements a new IEP.
Comparable Services Services that are “similar” or “equivalent” to those that were described in the child’s IEP from the previous public agency, as determined by the child’s newly-designated IEP team in the new public agency (as defined in August 14, 2006, comments in Fed. Register, Vol. 71)
Monitoring FindingsIntensive Program of Instruction • TEC §28.0213-(a) A school district shall offer an intensive program of instruction to a student who does not perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument administered under Subchapter B, Chapter 39. • For a student in a special education who does not perform satisfactorily on an assessment instrument the student's admission, review, and dismissal committee shall design the program to: • (1) enable the student to attain a standard of annual growth on the basis of the student's individualized education program
What Would One Expect to See in IEP? • Evidence of discussion of student’s performance on assessment • Minutes, additional information in PLAAFPs • Possible additional goals that target the objectives student failed • A change in or additional assistance for student in the area of need • Frequency/duration of additional assistance
Future SPED Monitoring TETNs • January 29, 2013 • March 21, 2013 • May 14. 2013 All sessions will be from 1:00-3:00 p.m.
If you need assistance: • Contact TEA at 512-463-5226 Gaynel Roberts Susan Marek Judy Struve spedmon@tea.state.tx.us