1 / 28

US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements

US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements. NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC. Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator, Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration. Solving the Congestion Problem. Shape Demand Invest in New Capacity

aviva
Download Presentation

US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. US DOT Congestion Initiative Urban Partnership Agreements NTOC Summer Meeting September 7, 2007 Washington, DC Jeffrey F. PaniatiAssociate Administrator, Office of OperationsFederal Highway Administration

  2. Solving the Congestion Problem • Shape Demand • Invest in New Capacity • Operate System at Peak Performance • Bring Supply and Demand into Alignment -- Congestion Pricing Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  3. Congestion Pricing – Bringing Supply and Demand into Alignment • Failure to properly price travel on highways is a root cause of congestion. • The price of highway travel (gas taxes, registration fees, etc.) bears little or no relationship to the cost of congestion. • Unlike other public utilities, the public expectation is that the “service” is free or does not change with changes in demand. • Rationing transportation services via pricing is more efficient than rationing by delay. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  4. Congestion Pricing - The Options HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  5. Congestion Pricing of Excess HOV Facility Capacity (HOT Lanes) Fees for SOV use vary based on traffic levels - I-394 MnPass Express lanes in Minneapolis (dynamic pricing, real-time), I-15FasTrack Lanes in San Diego (quasi-dynamic, every 6 minutes), and I-25 Express Lanes in Denver (variable pricing) all using electronic transponders. QuickRide in Houston, TX, on the Katy Freeway - HOV-3 free; HOV-2 is $2 per trip using electronic transponder. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  6. HOV and HOT Lanes in the U.S. Source: Texas Transportation Institute Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  7. USDOT’s Congestion Initiative: A Six-Point Plan • Relieve Urban Congestion. • Unleash private sector investment resources. • Promote operational and technological improvements. • Establish a “Corridors of the Future” competition. • Target major freight bottlenecks and expand freight policy outreach. • Accelerate major aviation capacity projects and provide a future funding framework. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  8. Urban Partnership Agreements – Congestion Pricing • Congestion Pricing is a key component of the USDOT Congestion Initiative (Relieve Urban Congestion element) - Urban Partnerships. • Integrated “4T” Strategy . • TOLLING (pricing) – Key Element • Direct user charge based on use of facility; varies based on level of congestion • Toll collection via electronic means (no booths) • Transit • Telecommuting/Travel Demand Management • Technology • About $850 million in USDOT Discretionary Funds. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  9. Preliminary Urban Partners Seattle Minneapolis -St. Paul New York City SanFrancisco Miami Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  10. Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges Minneapolis – St. Paul Miami Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  11. Minneapolis – St. Paul Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) • I-35W between downtown Minneapolis and the southern suburbs. • Existing HOV lanes converted to dynamically-priced HOT lanes (similar to existing MnPASS operation). • Existing HOT lanes extended. • Shoulder lanes dynamically priced. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  12. Minneapolis - St. Paul Urban Partner Technology • Electronic toll collection • ITS Technology to improve transit services • Arterial and freeway management Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  13. Minneapolis - St. Paul Urban Partner Transit • Establish a Bus Rapid Transit lane into downtown Minneapolis. • Advanced BRT stations and park and ride facilities for the North metro suburbs along the I-35W corridor. • “Transit advantage” bypass lane/ramp. • Contra-flow transit lanes in downtown Minneapolis. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  14. Miami Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) • 21 miles of HOT lanes on I-95 from Fort Lauderdale to downtown Miami. • Raise HOV limit from HOV2 to HOV3+. • Expand 10-lane highway to 12 lanes (by reducing the width of the existing lanes from 12 to 11 feet and using a portion of the shoulder). Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  15. Miami Urban Partner Technology • SunPass electronic toll collection. Transit • Operate BRT on HOT lanes. • Transit facility improvements. Telecommuting • Flex-time incentives. • Carpooling and vanpooling programs. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  16. Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges Minneapolis – St. Paul Seattle Miami San Francisco Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  17. Seattle Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) • Variable pricing on the State Route 520 floating bridge. • King County crossing that currently carries about 160,000 people per day between Seattle and its Eastside suburbs. • Tolls on the existing bridge are intended to help pay for the new bridge. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  18. Seattle Urban Partner Technology • Electronic toll collection • Real-time multi-modal traveler information • Active traffic management Transit • Enhance bus service and provide supporting amenities • Regional ferry service Telecommuting • Carpooling and vanpooling programs • Telecommuting outreach Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  19. San Francisco Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) • Variable pricing on Doyle Drive, the 1.5 mile elevated roadway leading to the Golden Gate Bridge. • Will charge an extra one-way-fee above the $5 toll on the Golden Gate Bridge. • Revenues will help pay to reconstruct the 70-year old Doyle Drive. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  20. San Francisco Urban Partner Technology • Electronic toll collection. • SFgo Arterial Traffic Management System/Traffic Controller Upgrades. • 511 Upgrades. • Creation of Integrated Mobility Accounts. • Dynamic message signs indicating current toll rates. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  21. San Francisco Urban Partner Transit • Improvements to Regional Ferry Service. • Improved Bus Service, including Bus Rapid Transit. Telecommuting • Variable pricing of on/off-street parking and city-owned garage spaces in downtown San Francisco. • Telecommuting outreach. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  22. Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges Minneapolis – St. Paul Seattle Miami San Francisco New York City Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  23. New York City Urban Partner The Big T (Tolling/Pricing) • Will charge drivers $8 and trucks $21 a day to enter or leave Manhattan below 86th Street on weekdays during the workday. • Those who drive only within the congestion zone would pay $4 a day for cars, $5.50 for trucks. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  24. New York City Urban Partner Technology • Electronic toll collection. Transit • Bus facilities and other improvements. • Initiation of Bus Rapid Transit. • Regional ferry services. Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  25. Congestion Pricing - The Progress HOV to HOT Conversion (Use Excess Capacity) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (New) Variably or Dynamically Priced Lanes (Existing) Cordon or Area Pricing Region - Wide Charges Minneapolis – St. Paul Seattle Miami San Francisco New York City Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  26. Congestion Pricing – Region Wide Charges • Current Examples • Studies in Oregon and Seattle have tested mileage-based fees and peak-period driving charges. • Nationwide Truck Pricing in Germany, Austria and Switzerland – Automated weight-distance truck tolls across their national highways (Note: Sets the stage for area-wide congestion pricing). Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  27. USDOT/FHWA Next Steps • Promote HOV to HOT Conversions through Tailored Technical Assistance • Urban Partners • Provide Direct Support to the Urban Partners • Harness and Share Experiences • Provide General Resource Material - Tailored Workshops and Seminars; Reference Material • Value Pricing Pilot Program Lessons Learned • Model Pricing Legislation • “Making the Case” Outreach and Technical Support Strategy to Reduce Congestion

  28. For More Information • Visit • www.fightgridlocknow.gov • www.fhwa.dot.gov/congestion/index.htm Strategy to Reduce Congestion

More Related