210 likes | 220 Views
Explore insights from the HSS Office of Health, Safety, and Security regarding assessment, causal analysis, enforcement programs, and performance issues. Learn about strengths, weaknesses, and the path forward for enhanced safety practices.
E N D
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Assessment and Causal Analysis:Enforcement Lessons-Learned ISM Workshop 2007 Tony Weadock Office of Enforcement
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Overview • Enforcement Program • Performance Issue • Assessment Program - strengths and weaknesses • Causal Analysis - strengths and weaknesses • Enforcement response and path forward
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Enforcement Program • HQ office • Network of coordinators • Authority to issue civil penalties • Issue average of 10 nuclear safety actions/year
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Program Changes • New Office and Staff • Expanded scope • 10 CFR 851 • 10 CFR 824
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Enforcement Approach • Contractors best positioned to recognize and correct noncompliances • Incentives • Discretion • Mitigation (self-reporting and corrective actions) • Formal reporting to NTS or ITAC • Enforcement actions pursued for significant and egregious noncompliances
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Enforcement Approach(cont.) • To date (nuclear safety): • Reviewed between 10 – 15K potential cases • 104 Enforcement Actions • $8.8 M imposed in civil penalties • $5.7 M waived • 6 Consent Orders • Nuclear safety approach is model for security and worker safety enforcement
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Performance Issue How does Enforcement evaluate contractor performance? • Monitors events, NTS, assessments, etc. • Investigations • Program Reviews
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Performance (cont.) • Significant percentage of serious nuclear safety violations are not self-identified • Majority of enforcement cases involve recurrent events or issues • Conclusion – need to improve the identification and correction of nuclear safety problems
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Performance (cont.) • Resulting emphasis on review of causal analysis and assessment processes • Enforcement Director acts as visible advocate • Goal – assessment driven vs. event driven • Business case
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Assessment ProgramGeneral • Management and independent assessment (830.122(i) and (j)) • See more issues with management assessment • Evaluate (from a high level) as part of the Program Review process • Investigations – event follow-up presents opportunity to evaluate assessment program
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Assessment ProgramStrengths • Peer Reviews • Effectiveness Reviews • Focus on fewer, more significant assessments • Increased use of site tracking systems – better trending of issues • SMEs used to critique management assessments
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Assessment ProgramWeaknesses • Perfunctory, checklist approach • Unqualified assessors – functional area and process • Too much information – can be misleading • Human resources • Inconsistent terminology • No formal tracking or disposition of issues • Lack of critical self-evaluation of program • Lack of perceived value by management
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Causal AnalysisGeneral • 10 CFR 830.122(c)(3) – Quality Improvement • Graded approach • Multiple methods in use
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Causal AnalysisStrengths • Formalization of instances when root cause analysis is required • Extent of condition (and cause) • Incorporation of Human Performance Improvement • Use of causal analysts in reviewing corrective actions • Effectiveness reviews
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Causal AnalysisWeaknesses • Truncate before getting to underlying issues • Cause terminology more conducive to trending than developing corrective actions • Focusing on part of the problem • Extent of condition/cause not evaluated
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Weaknesses (cont.) • Precursors not evaluated • Tendency to avoid cultural issues • Poor linkage between causes and corrective actions • Corrective actions not completed or timely
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Enforcement Response • Increased emphasis • Escalation of penalties • EGS 05-01 (since incorporated into Enforcement Process Overview)
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security EGS 05-01 Enforcement evaluation includes looking for: • Extent of condition review • Precursor review • Evaluation of assessment effectiveness
HSS Office of Health, Safety and Security Path Forward • Continue emphasis/escalation • Support peer review process • Continuing dialogue • HS-40 sponsors EFCOG Safety and Security Regulatory and Contractor Assurance Working Groups • Expediting enforcement process • Integrating VPP