1 / 23

Forecast Verification Research

Forecast Verification Research. Barbara Brown, NCAR With thanks to Beth Ebert and Laurie Wilson S2S Workshop, 5-7 Feb 2013, Met Office. Verification working group members. Beth Ebert (BOM, Australia) Laurie Wilson (CMC, Canada) Barb Brown (NCAR, USA) Barbara Casati (Ouranos, Canada)

Download Presentation

Forecast Verification Research

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Forecast Verification Research Barbara Brown, NCAR With thanks to Beth Ebert and Laurie Wilson S2S Workshop, 5-7 Feb 2013, Met Office

  2. Verification working group members • Beth Ebert (BOM, Australia) • Laurie Wilson (CMC, Canada) • Barb Brown (NCAR, USA) • Barbara Casati (Ouranos, Canada) • Caio Coelho (CPTEC, Brazil) • Anna Ghelli (ECMWF, UK) • Martin Göber (DWD, Germany) • Simon Mason (IRI, USA) • Marion Mittermaier (Met Office, UK) • Pertti Nurmi (FMI, Finland) • Joel Stein (Météo-France) • Yuejian Zhu (NCEP, USA)

  3. Aims Verification component of WWRP, in collaboration with WGNE, WCRP, CBS (“Joint” between WWRP and WGNE) • Develop and promote new verification methods • Training on verification methodologies • Ensure forecast verification is relevantto users • Encourage sharing of observational data • Promote importance of verification as a vital part of experiments • Promote collaboration among verification scientists, model developers and forecast providers

  4. Relationships / collaboration WGCM WGNE TIGGE SDS-WAS HyMeX Polar Prediction SWFDP YOTC CG-FV Subseasonal to Seasonal Prediction WGSIP SRNWP COST-731

  5. FDPs and RDPs Sydney 2000 FDP Beijing 2008 FDP/RDP SNOW-V10 RDP FROST-14 FDP/RDP MAP D-PHASE Typhoon Landfall FDP Severe Weather FDP

  6. SNOW-V10 • Nowcast and regional model verification at obs sites • User-oriented verification • Tuned to decision thresholds of VANOC, whole Olympic period • Model-oriented verification • Model forecasts verified in parallel, January to August 2010 • Status • Significant effort to process and quality-control observations • Multiple observations at some sites  observation error

  7. Wind speed verification (model-oriented) Visibility verification(user-oriented)

  8. FROST-14 User-focused verification • Threshold-based as in SNOW-V10 • Timing of events – onset, duration, cessation • Real-time verification • Road weather forecasts? Model-focused verification • Neighborhood verification of high-resolution NWP • Spatial verification of ensembles Account for observation uncertainty

  9. Promotion of best practice Recommended methods for evaluating cloud and related parameters

  10. Promotion of best practice Verification of tropical cyclone forecasts Introduction Observations and analyses Forecasts Current practice in TC verification – deterministic forecasts Current verification practice – Probabilistic forecasts and ensembles Verification of monthly and seasonal tropical cyclone forecasts Experimental verification methods Comparing forecasts Presentation of verification results

  11. Verification of deterministic TC forecasts

  12. Beyond track and intensity… Track error distribution TCgenesis Wind speed Precipitation (MODE spatial method)

  13. Promotion of best practice • Verification of forecasts from mesoscale models (early DRAFT) • Purposes of verification • Choices to be made • Surface and/or upper-air verification? • Point-wise and/or spatial verification? • Proposal for 2nd Spatial Verification Intercomparison Project in collaboration with Short-Range NWP (SRNWP)

  14. Spatial Verification Method Intercomparison Project • International comparison of many new spatial verification methods • Phase 1 (precipitation) completed • Methods applied by researchers to same datasets (precipitation; perturbed cases; idealized cases) • Subjective forecast evaluations • Weather and Forecasting special collection 2009-2010 • Phase 2 in planning stage • Complex terrain • MAP D-PHASE / COPS dataset • Wind and precipitation, timing errors

  15. Outreach and training http://www.cawcr.gov.au/projects/verification/ • Verification workshops and tutorials • On-site, travelling • SWFDP (e.g., east Africa) • EUMETCAL training modules • Verification web page • Sharing of tools

  16. 5th International Verification Methods Workshop Melbourne 2011 Tutorial • 32 students from 23 countries • Lectures and exercises (took tools home) • Group projects - presented at workshop Workshop • ~120 participants • Topics: • Ensembles and probabilistic forecasts • Seasonal and climate • Aviation verification • User-oriented verification • Diagnostic methods and tools • Tropical cyclones and high impact weather • Weather warning verification • Uncertainty • Special issue of Meteorol. Applications in early 2013

  17. NWP climate change decadal prediction seasonal prediction sub- seasonal prediction global very short range regional Spatial scale nowcasts local point minutes hours days weeks months years decades forecast aggregation time Seamless verification Seamless forecasts - consistent across space/time scales single modelling system or blended likely to be probabilistic / ensemble

  18. "Seamless verification" – consistent across space/time scales • Modelling perspective – is my model doing the right thing? • Process approaches • LES-style verification of NWP runs (first few hours) • T-AMIP style verification of coupled / climate runs (first few days) • Single column model • Statistical approaches • Spatial and temporal spectra • Spread-skill • Marginal distributions (histograms, etc.) Perkins et al., J.Clim. 2007

  19. "Seamless verification" – consistent across space/time scales • User perspective – can I use this forecast to help me make a better decision? • Neighborhood approaches - spatial and temporal scales with useful skill • Generalized discrimination score (Mason & Weigel, MWR 2009) • consistent treatment of binary, multi-category, continuous, probabilistic forecasts • Calibration - accounting for space-time dependence of bias and accuracy? • Conditional verification based on larger scale regime • Extreme Forecast Index (EFI) approach for extremes • JWGFVR activity • Proposal for research in verifying forecasts in weather-climate interface • Assessment component of UK INTEGRATE project

  20. Questions • What should be the role of JWGFVR in S2S? • Defining protocols? Metrics? • Guidance on methods? • Participation in activities? • Linking forecasting and applications? • What should be the interaction with other WMO verification activities? E.g., Standardized Verification System for Long-range Forecasts (SVS-LRF); WGNE/WGCM Climate Metrics Panel • How do metrics need to change for S2S? • How do we cope with small sample sizes • Is a common set of metrics required for S2S?

  21. Database comments • Database should be designed to allow easy access for • Applications • Verification • Will need observations for evaluations and applications • Will these (or links to these) be included in the database? • Lack of obs can be a big challenge / detriment to use of the database • Access to data • For applications and verification often will not want a whole field or set of fields • Also may want to be able to examine time series of forecasts at points • Data formats and access can limit uses

  22. Opportunities! • New challenges • Methods for evaluating extremes • Sorting out some of the thorny problems (small sample sizes, limited observations, etc.) • Defining meaningful metrics associated with research questions • Making a useful connection between forecast performance and forecast usefulness/value • Application areas (e.g., precipitation onset in Africa) • A new research area • Using spatial methods for evaluation of S2S forecast patterns

  23. Thank you

More Related