150 likes | 326 Views
SYNDICATE PRESENTATION SYNDICATE -5. NOMINAL ROLL OF SYNDICATE-5. NOMINAL ROLL OF SYNDICATE-5. ASSUMPTIONS. SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF POLITICAL HEADS-WILL TO INFLUENCE. REGION, ASIA-PACIFIC/EXTENDED-MANY COMMON ISSUES. ACTIONS TO HAVE LEGAL APPROVAL. UN/ WORLD FORUM-REGIONAL COOP.
E N D
SYNDICATE PRESENTATION SYNDICATE -5
ASSUMPTIONS • SUBJECT TO APPROVAL OF POLITICAL HEADS-WILL TO INFLUENCE. • REGION, ASIA-PACIFIC/EXTENDED-MANY COMMON ISSUES. • ACTIONS TO HAVE LEGAL APPROVAL. UN/ WORLD FORUM-REGIONAL COOP. • REDEFINED ROLES OF ARMIES VIS-A-VIS POLICE.
ISSUES • NON-TRADITIONAL THREATS AND A COMMON APPROACH. • CHANGING ROLES OF ARMIES. • COMMON SECURITY MODEL AND LESSONS OF PAST EXPERIENCE IN MULTINATIONAL/COALITION OPS.
NON-TRADITIONAL THREATS PROLIFERATION OF WMD. NARCOTIC TRAFFICKING. EXTREMISM / FUNDAMENTALISM. MARITIME PIRACY. HUMAN TRAFFICKING. TERRORISM INCLUDING CYBER TERRORISM. EMERGENCE OF NEW TERRORIST GROUPS WITH TRANSNATIONAL AGENDAS. BIOLOGICAL & ECOLOGICAL THREATS. SEPARATISM – POLITICAL, SOCIAL, STRUCTURAL AND CULTURAL FACTORS. ENERGY SECURITY. FOOD & WATER SHORTAGES.
IMPACT OF NON TRADITIONAL WARFARE • RELEVANCE OF NATIONAL BORDERS/ GEOG BDYS. • INTER-CHANGE OF ROLES. • CHANGE OF ROE. • TAC ACTIONS CAN HAVE STRAT EFFECT. • TRAIN FOR WIDE SPECTRUM OF OPS. • PREDOMINANTLY PSYCHOLOGICAL THAN PHYSICAL. • NECESSITATES COLLECTIVE APPCH.
MEASURES REQUIRED TO ADDRESS THREAT • ACHIEVE AND SUSTAIN POLITICAL WILL. • ADAPT ORG TO MEET REQUIREMENT. • COMMON APPROACH TO: • DEVP INTEROPERABILITY, JT TRG & EX. • GATHERING AND SHARING INT INCL HUMINT. • RAPID REACTION CAPABILITY. • SMALL TEAM ACTIONS. • COMBINED AND JT OPS. • JT CIV- MIL MSNS. • MULTIPLE FORCE CAPABILITY. • SHARE TRG FACILITIES AND TECH.
DEVELOPMENT OF CAPABILITIES • RESTRUCTURE FORCES AND ORG - REVIEW REQUIREMENT OF CONVENTIONAL FORCES. • INT- FOCUS ON HUMAN INT. • DATA BANKS- TERRORIST ORG, TACS AND SP BASES. • TRG OF JR LDRS. • NEW DOCTRINES AND TRG CONCEPTS. • ACQUISITION OF SPECIALISED EQUIPMENT.
CHANGES REQUIRED • THOUGHT PROCESS OF LDRS AND MEN. • LEVEL OF INTELLECT OF TPS. • INTER-OPERABILITY. • USE OF HIGH TECH WPNS. • RAPID REACTION. • SMALL TEAM OPS. • AVOID PREDICTABLE THINKING. • EXPANSION OF MIL MSN. • COMMON UNDERSTANDING OF PROBLEMS.
COMMON SECURITY MODELS • REGIONAL (NATO) AND SUB- REGIONAL (ARF) MODELS. • INFORMAL AND ISSUE BASED MODELS (RAMSI, GWOT) • MSN BASED. • TIME BOUND. • OTHER SUCCESS MODELS. • ORGANISATION OF COLLECTIVE SECURITY AGREEMENT. • FIVE POWER DEFENCE ARRANGEMENT (FPDA).
LESSONS LEARNT-COALITION OPS. • BETTER SHARING OF INFO. • LANGUAGE BARRIER. • TECH GAP. • COMMON STANDING ORDERS. • TRAIN TO COMMON STANDARDS. • COMMAND AND CONTROL PROBLEM.
MAJOR ISSUES 1. ALL SHARE EMERGING SECURITY THREATS, TERRORISM- COMMON EN. 2. ALL AGREE ON DESIRABILITY FOR COLLECTIVE/ COOPERATIVE RESPONSE. 3. ACTIONABLE INITIATIVES. 4. EDUCATION- MAJOR CONCERN - PUBLIC, POLITICIANS. 5. LIMITATION OF MILITARY TO ADDRESS NON-TRADITIONAL THREATS – NEED FOR INTER-AGENCY / STATE COOPERATION.
UN HAS THE AUTHORITY, BUT REGIONAL ALLIANCES HAVE EFFICIENCY.