1 / 8

OPIM 5894 Advanced Project management ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case

OPIM 5894 Advanced Project management ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case. TEAM 1. http://users.business.uconn.edu/snair/opim5894.html. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case.

brone
Download Presentation

OPIM 5894 Advanced Project management ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. OPIM 5894 Advanced Project managementARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case TEAM 1 http://users.business.uconn.edu/snair/opim5894.html

  2. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case • Which of the two components (software, technical) are underperforming according to the plan? How do you know this? (Draw graphs, as necessary to make your point) • Technical component is underperforming. See graphs. • Are the components of the project within budget? How do you know? • Software component is within budget. • Technical component is not within budget. Prof. Suresh Nair, University of Connecticut

  3. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case Prof. Suresh Nair, University of Connecticut

  4. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case Prof. Suresh Nair, University of Connecticut

  5. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case Prof. Suresh Nair, University of Connecticut

  6. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case • What can you conclude by looking at the combined earned value data for the project? • Combined earned value is not a good indication of the individual work streams status. • Why did Terry Baker think that the project was going according to plan the entire time? • Gantt Chart did not show which component of the project was causing the delay. • Gantt Chart was not detailed enough and did not have enough sub-tasks. • Terry was not paying attention to how each individual tasks were progressing, but rather was looking from a higher level. • Overall project looked like it was on time (overperformance on technical side/underperformance on software side).

  7. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case • How much longer will the project take? (it is September now) • One additional month beyond the estimated completion date (November). • What should Martin have done earlier in the project timeline to prevent delays? • Earned Value Analysis. • Identify underperformed work stream. • What should Martin do when managing future projects to prevent similar problems from developing? • Have a more granular work breakdown structure. • Implement earned value into early stages of the project. Prof. Suresh Nair, University of Connecticut

  8. ARIBA IMPLEMENTATION IN MED-X case Prof. Suresh Nair, University of Connecticut

More Related