140 likes | 265 Views
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team. A Progress Report. 1. Strategic Planning (including a shared mission and vision for the department) [23]. The PAC structure with subcommittees designed to give maximum voice for all faculty members. The departmental listserv will also aid in this.
E N D
Work of the Faculty Leadership Team A Progress Report
1. Strategic Planning (including a shared mission and vision for the department) [23] • The PAC structure with subcommittees designed to give maximum voice for all faculty members. The departmental listserv will also aid in this. • The PAC committee will give the chair advice in a more systematic manner.
2. Workload [21] • The sub-committee structure will encourage more transparency and equity in teaching and other workload assignments. • We recommend that guidelines for workload be considered by a Task Force working on the Department Handbook.
3. Need to Establish Shared Values (e.g. programs, direction of the department, professional relationships, etc.) [17] • The sub-committee structure is meant to encourage all faculty to determine and affirm our shared values.
4. Clarification of Faculty Roles and Ranks [12] • Recognizing that this is an important issue, we recommend that guidelines be considered by a Task Force working on the Department Handbook.
4. Clarification of Faculty Roles and Ranks [12]. . . continued • Qualifications for Teaching Specific Courses: • general education courses: graduate work in specific course. To teach beyond general education: • Ph.D. in area of specialization • ABD in specialty area • Through scholarship and pedagogy have developed expertise in the area
5. Unprofessional Behavior [11] • Issue of unprofessional behavior can be addressed by concerned faculty in the following manner: faculty who feel the need for facilitated conversations with colleagues should contact the Chair or Ansley Barton. • We recommend that the sub-committees adopt and follow the “Discussion Guidelines” used by the FLT
6. Departmental Governance [10] • We believe the PAC structure will serve the department well for the immediate future even as we consider its modifications in the next year.
6. Departmental Governance [10] . . . continued • We recommend that PAC select one of its seven coordinators/directors to represent the department on the College Curriculum Committee and to serve as Chair of PAC when curricular issues are discussed. • We recommend that we keep the current plan for the T & P committee with the understanding that anyone elected this year might serve only one year.
6. Departmental Governance [10] . . . continued • Procedures for evaluating the PAC model will be developed by PAC in conjunction with the department as a whole and the Chair.
7. Clarification of Performance Expectations for Faculty [9] • Recognizing that this is an important issue, we recommend that guidelines be considered by a Task Force working on the Department Handbook.
8. Developing Skills to Deal with Change More Effectively [8] • No specific recommendation.
9. Low Morale [8] • We believe the PAC structure and our development of a up-to-date departmental handbook will address larger departmental concerns, and that clear provisions for addressing individual differences will go a long way toward raising morale.