1 / 15

Integrated Operation and economy

Integrated Operation and economy. NPD and OLF has calculated the value of IO on the Norwegian shelf to be 40 billion USD Statoil’s anticipated IO-potential is more than 50 % of the above

Download Presentation

Integrated Operation and economy

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Integrated Operation and economy • NPD and OLF has calculated the value of IO on the Norwegian shelf to be 40 billion USD • Statoil’s anticipated IO-potential is more than 50 % of the above • External review of the Integrated Operations efforts on one of our major fields calculates the value created to close to 1 billion USD, with a further potential of 0,7 +\- 0,4 billion USD

  2. Overal use of WITSML in Statoil • Statoil have transferred information from 300+ wells with the use of WITSML (and stopped counting) • Incorporate all wells operated by Statoil in the Norwegian sector • Incorporate a growing amount of wells internationally (Iran, Venezuela, Angola etc.)

  3. Current situation from our IT real time support centre in Statoil • Period 1/6-06 to 31/8-06: • WITSML = 29 wells • = 85 191 m WITSML stream • = 255 571 ft WITSML stream PROBLEMS with the start of 50% of these streams due to lack of automation

  4. Challenges with real-time WITSML stream • Still many manual operations to set up and maintain the real-time stream • WITSML not properly supporting automation • Applications is not properly supporting real-time data • Some of the products in the data stream are not built to support multiple well streams (up to 20 simultaneous wells) • Manual work needed to handle dialects of WITSML and multiple versions in use

  5. Good things about the real-time WITSML stream • It does its job of transporting data to the end users in the operations centres in Statoil • The users are getting used to the use of real-time data due to every well being transferred in real-time (it drives habits) • It is one of the cornerstones in harvesting the overall value of Integrated Operations

  6. Welcome and Introductions, POSC Keynote Presentation, Julian Pickering, BP WITSML SIG Team Reports Oil Companies BP Hydro, Lars-Olav Grovik Statoil Software and Supplier Companies Paradigm Schlumberger SDC Geologix Sense Intellifield Baker Hughes Halliburton INT Petrolink Merrick Systems Public Seminar, October 19 Agenda

  7. Real Time Data Challenges - Operation and Support

  8. Overview • Since October 2005 • Grane, OSC, OSE, Troll, Njord, Fram Vest • 20 wells, 62 wellbores • Service companies • Baker • Halliburton • End users • RMS • GeoFrame • DrillWorks/Predict • Bore • Morning Status Check • Daily before 08:00

  9. Onshore Processing Center – Bringing it All Together

  10. Onshore Processing Center –West Venture at Sandsli

  11. Update speed < 5 mins is accepable Operational Support (not Operational Control) Drilling and Well Operations WITSML WITSML Well Wellbore Trajectory Trajectory Station Log Rig Realtime bhaRun Right Time Data

  12. Current WITSML Status • Generally 10 – 15 parallel drilling operations are active at any time all using WITSML. • WITSML has been in operations for nearly 3 years. In total, 87 wells drilled with WITSML so far. • 2004 and 2005: 36 wells • 2006 already: 51 wells

  13. Service Companies WITSML Data Deliveries • Stable deliveries most of the time • Still some erroneous data • Wrong wellbore • Data too deep • Missing data • Re-load of data • Conclusion: This will always happen  We need better data management tools • Issues with the WITSML delivered from service companies • SiteCom in Hydro based on active wellbore flag • Do we read the same data over and over again from the service companies? • Append mode versus overwrite mode • Conclusion: The goal is automated data transfer with as few re-reads as possible

  14. Challenges, Real Time Data in Hydro • Continuos stable delivery from service companies • Need: Active wellbore + update date • Better quality check of data before delivered to Hydro • If wrong data, need to do full refresh of all data on SiteCom and end user applications • New WITSML data types • Amount of data for time logs/curves • When will service companies be able to deliver new data types? • Update speed from service companies • Transfer all data only once • Error recovery speed • Errors will happen, important to recovery quickly • WITSML Version 1.3 deployment to replace WITSML Version 1.2 • 2007/2008

  15. Thank You धन्यवाद

More Related