1 / 5

Possible Options for 802.11 TGs Call for Proposals

Possible Options for 802.11 TGs Call for Proposals. W. Steven Conner Intel Corp. Possible Criteria for 802.11s CFP. Option 1: CFP References PAR Only Option 2: CFP References PAR, Minimum Requirements, and (Out-of-)Scope Possible Sub-documents Usage Models Terms/Definitions Architecture?

cbergen
Download Presentation

Possible Options for 802.11 TGs Call for Proposals

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Possible Options for 802.11 TGs Call for Proposals W. Steven Conner Intel Corp. W. Steven Conner, Intel

  2. Possible Criteria for 802.11s CFP • Option 1: CFP References PAR Only • Option 2: CFP References PAR, Minimum Requirements, and (Out-of-)Scope • Possible Sub-documents • Usage Models • Terms/Definitions • Architecture? • Option 3: CFP References PAR, Detailed Functional Requirements, Comparison Criteria, Scope • Possible Sub-documents: • Usage Models • Simulation Scenarios • Terms/Definitions • Architecture? Recommendation / Additional Guidelines Official / Part of FRCC W. Steven Conner, Intel

  3. Possible Tradeoffs • Option 1: CFP References PAR Only • Possible Benefits: • See proposals quickly • Possible Downsides: • Broad interpretations of the PAR and assumed scope may lead to wide variation in proposal scope – difficulty in selecting/merging proposals • No formal/detailed selection criteria in place. • Option 2: CFP References PAR, Minimum Requirements, and Scope • Possible Benefits: • Additional guidelines on requirements, establish items that are out of scope up front • Light-weight process to get to CFP quickly • Don’t try to perfect requirements up front – once we have an initial draft, TG can extend/amend • Possible Downsides: • No formal/detailed selection criteria in place • Option 3: CFP References PAR, Detailed FRCC, Scope • Possible Benefits: • Very formal requirements and comparison criteria should help in down-selection of proposals • Possible Downsides: • Process to adopt detailed functional requirements and comparison criteria may take a long time • (TGn spent 5 TG meetings to finalize FRCC before sending out CFP) W. Steven Conner, Intel

  4. Recommendation • TGs currently has a target date for CFP, but no process or criteria for CFP • TGs should decide on a process and plan for moving toward an initial draft W. Steven Conner, Intel

  5. Discussion?Straw Polls? W. Steven Conner, Intel

More Related