320 likes | 334 Views
Join us at the Expert Group Meeting to discuss the vision and implementation of sustainable development objectives in land administration systems using ICT. Learn from European countries' experiences and explore key principles and challenges for the next generation of land administration systems.
E N D
Day: Wednesday 9th November • Session: 9.00am - 10.30am • Speaker: Ian Williamson • Topic: Welcome and Vision
Incorporating Sustainable Development Objectives into ICT Enabled Land Administration Systems Expert Group Meeting 9-11 November 2005 Geomatics The University of Melbourne Australia’s International Science Linkages Program Centre for SDIs and Land Administration Developing a land administration vision Welcome and overview Ian Williamson Expert Group Meeting 2005 Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration Department of Geomatics, The University of Melbourne
Expert Group Meeting • International Participants - Stig Enemark (Denmark) - Bas Kok (Netherlands) - Holger Magel (Germany) - Paul van der Molen (Netherlands) - Daniel Steudler (Switzerland) • Australian Participants - Barry Cribb (Western Australia) - Barbara Flett (Dpt. of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria) - Peter Holland (Geoscience Australia) - Steve Jacoby (Dpt. of Natural Resources and Mines, Queensland) - Ian Lloyd (Land Equity International) - Brian Marwick (Logica CMG) - John Rickard (Dpt. of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria) - Graeme Rush (PSMA Australia) - Grahame Searle (Dpt. Land Information, Western Australia) - Warwick Watkins (Dpt. of Lands, New South Wales)
Expert Group Meeting Participants from Centre for SDI and Land Administration, Department of Geomatics, University of Melbourne - Rohan Bennett - Andrew Binns - Mohsen Kalantari - Hossein Mohammadi - Abbas Rajabifard - Jude Wallace - Ian Williamson
Expert Group Meeting • Wed 9th 7:00pm - EGM Dinner – Student Union Building (marked on map in participant folder) • Thursday 10th 5:00pm – Australian Wine and Cheese – CRC Boardroom • Friday 11th 1:30pm - 5:00pm – Open Workshop – Lecture Theatre C2, Engineering Block C, Department of Geomatics
EGM Focus • New vision for ICT enabled LAS – the “project” • Recognition that Western European countries have a long tradition of accommodating sustainable development objectives into their land administration systems – what can Australia learn from these experiences? • A model was developed as part of the Project Incorporating sustainable development objectives into ICT enabled land administration systems to be used as a basis for discussion • Individual jurisdictions to discuss the model in relation to their jurisdictional needs • A list of key issues were developed to guide discussion
EGM Outlook • Day 1 – Focus on European approach • Develop set of key principles to inform the development of an LAS vision • Day 2 – Focus on Australian approach • Develop set of key principles to inform the development of the LAS vision • Day 3 –The next generation of LAS • Attempt to gain a consensus on key principles for a generic ICT enabled LAS • Open Workshop to present the results of EGM
Open Workshop • Friday 1:30-5:00pm, Lecture Theatre C2 – Department of Geomatics, Engineering Building C • Vision for the next generation of ICT and spatially enabled LAS will be publicly presented at this workshop • Each presenter to have 15 minutes
Open Workshop • Stig Enemark – Danish overview The Land Management Paradigm • Holger Magel – German Overview The role of FIG • Paul v.d. Molen – Dutch overview FIG Commission 7 Activities • Daniel Steudler – Swiss overview The Cadastral Template • Bas Kok – EU initiatives INSPIRE • Grahame Searle – Australian experience
EGM FOCUS THE VISION or PARADIGM • What is the vision for an ICT enabled LAS to support sustainable development? • Is a common understanding possible? • Is this “land management” or “land information management”? KEY DRIVERS • Rank in importance the key drivers • Is tax (in all its forms) a driver? KEY COMPONENTS AND TOOLS • Authentic registers? • The IT architecture to deliver the vision? • The spatial dimension- SDI? • Infrastructure to support trading in complex commodities? CHALLENGES AND ISSUES FOR IMPROVEMENT • Achieving a national system in a federated country • Achieving spatially enabled government • Should the land registry system contribute to SD? How? • Relationship between the land registry and spatial cadastre • Can international comparative monitoring be established? • Administration of restrictions and responsibilities • Is the land parcel still central to LA? • The role of buildings in land administration
Welcome & Research Vision Presentations - European Perspective of Paradigm Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Steve Jacoby European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Paul van der Molen Evaluate – Components of the vision Report Back - DiscussionEuropean Lessons Learnt Day 1 – Wednesday Nov 9th
Presentations - Australian Perspective of Paradigm Australian Group Coordinator: Stig Enemark Rapporteur: Grahame Searle European Group Coordinator: Ian Williamson Rapporteur: Daniel Steudler Evaluate – Components of the vision Report Back - DiscussionAustralian Lessons Learnt Day 2 – Thursday Nov 10th
Day 3 – Friday Nov 11th Presentation – Spatially Enabling Government Evaluate – Issues in Designing a New Generation of LAS Group 1 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Warwick Watkins Group 2 (based on Australian & European Perspectives) Rapporteur: Holger Magel Report Back - Discussion Final Presentation Next Generation of LAS Ian Williamson, Stig Enemark, Jude Wallace
EGM Outcomes • Publication • Website
Roles and responsibilities • EGM Coordinators – Ian Williamson (Host) and Stig Enemark • Project Coordinator – Jude Wallace • EGM support – Andrew Binns, Rohan Bennett • EGM publication – Abbas Rajabifard • Secretarial – Colleen Birmingham
A simple view of a cadastre and its core role in land administration
Recognise the relationship of people to land is dynamic Reference: Ting et al, 1998
As a result LA also changes and evolves Reference: Ting and Williamson, 1998
Development of complex commodities(Wallace and Williamson, 2004)
Sustainable Development LA SDI Centre for Spatial Data Infrastructures and Land Administration Department of Geomatics, The University of Melbourne
STAGES IN THE EVOLUTION OF AUSTRALIAN LAND ADMINISTRATION POST WWII 1945-1970 Independent silos Paper files Land market support Tenure security None Aust Govt. National mapping focus MARKET 1970-1980 Flat file databases Special titles Strata titles None National mapping focus - Competition with industry SMALL GOVT 1985-1998 Public-Private Partnerships Relational databases; PCs, GIS Govt downsizing Business models ALTS Plans digitised Parcel Identifier Growth of state data sets ie VicMap Downsizing Cooperative – PSMA ANZLIC WWW 1999-2005 Growing national focus Multi users, on-line access Environmental sustainability “Triple bottom line” eConveyancing Digital plans Data convergence Spatial Data Infrastructues (SDI) Cooperative - GNAF Cadastral model STATE Administration Tools Policy Major Projects Interoperability Spatial Info. FEDERAL
1970 1980 1990 2005 2010 Manual Systems Hardcopy Maps and Indexes Computerization DCDB and Indexes Online Land Administration Web enablement eLand Administration Interoperability iLand Spatially Enabled Government and Private Sector Technical evolution of land administration
The iLand Vision • Integrated, spatially enabled land information available on the Web • Enables the “where” in government policies, strategies and information • Spatial information and particularly land information will challenge ICT, biotechnology and nanotechnology as the key enabling technologies of the next decade
TheiLand vision is where all government information systems are spatially enabled, and the “where” or location provided by spatial information are regarded as common goods made available to citizens and businesses to encourage creativity, efficiency and product development
Land administration vision for spatially enabling government Information is relative to activity and use Information is relative to time, owner, interest, and parcel
A Land Administration Vision? (Enemark, Williamson and Wallace, 2004)
Objective, outcomes and processEGM • Developed a LAS model for comparison • Key questions – Vision, Key components, Implementation issues, Evaluation and monitoring • European approach – break out and report • Australian approach – break out and report • Generic lessons leaned – break out and report • A new vision • Open workshop
EGM Outlook • Day 1 – Focus on European approach • Develop set of key principles to inform the development of an LAS model • Day 2 – Focus on Australian approach • Develop set of key principles to inform the development of the LAS model • Day 3 –The next generation of LAS • Attempt to gain a consensus on key principles for a generic ICT enabled LAS • Public workshop to present the results of EGM