250 likes | 258 Views
In this meeting, the presentation reviews WRAP Strategic Plan Phase 1 & 2, emissions inventory data, and incorporating monitoring, modeling, and EI data into AoH analysis. It discusses regional site clusters and outlines the AoH report.
E N D
Overview of ARS Presentationsand Review of EI Data SetsAoH Meeting, Salt Lake CitySeptember 21-22, 2004 Air Resource Specialists, Inc.
Overview • Part 1 (Today) • WRAP Strategic Plan, Phases 1 & 2 • Review of Emissions Inventory data used as inputs for interim modeling efforts • Review of basic EI summaries • Suggestions for better resolution of EI data • Part 2 (Today) • Incorporating monitoring, modeling and EI data into AoH analysis • Discussion of regional site clusters • Part 3 (Tomorrow) • Review of AoH report outline
Phase I – Data Sets • Emissions Inventories • Currently available • Modeling Data • RMC to present some results tomorrow (9/22), more by November • Monitoring Data • IMPROVE aerosol data available. DRI to present regression analyses at AoH workgroup meeting in November.
Emissions Data Set • EPA 2002 NEI not available until 12/05 → WRAP facilitated development of “interim” 2002 Emissions • Point • Area • Mobile (On-Road & Non-Road) • Road Dust (Paved & Unpaved) • Fire • Windblown Dust • Biogenics • Modeling Domain Boundary Conditions
Point and Area Sources (EH Pechan) • EI includes US States, Canada and Mexico
Mobile Sources (ENVIRON) • Emissions were estimated for the 1996 base year and four future years – 2003, 2008, 2013, 2018 • 2003 Emissions used for “interim” 2002 • On-road (EPA MOBILE6 and PART5) • Off-road (EPA NONROAD2000) • Road Dust (interpolated between 1996 and 2018) • One known limitation: • For off-road emissions, NONROAD2000 overestimates VOC (~13%), NOx (~35%), PM2.5 (~28%) and SO2 (~72%). • CA provided estimates directly, so these errors don’t apply to CA • EI includes US States, Canada and Mexico
Fire Emissions (WRAP) • Actual 2002 wildland fire and prescribed fire emission inventories • Specific location, date, size and fuel loading for each fire event. • EI includes WRAP states only
Windblown Dust (RMC) • Modeled using: • Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) • BELD3, NALCC, NLCD • Soil Characteristics • STATSGO; Soil Landscape of Canada; Intl. Soil Reference and Information Centre • Meteorological Data • 2002 36-km MM5 • Agricultural Data • BELD3, RUSLE2, CTIC • EI includes modeling domain
Biogenics Emissions (RMC) • Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS3) • Vegetation Data: Biogenic Emissions Landuse Database (BELD3) • Meteorological Data (MM5v3) • Biogenic Emissions Inventory System (BEIS3) • EI includes US states
Boundary Conditions (RMC) RMC: http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/vistas/inputs/gifs/BC/vistas.geoschem.mean.so4.gif
Pie Chart Representation of Area Emissions by State/Province
Gridded Representation of CMAQ Wind Blown Dust Model Emissions Inputs RMC: http://pah.cert.ucr.edu/aqm/308/wb_dust2002/scen_d/PMFINE/PMFINE_yearly.scen_d.gif
California Emissions Comparison • EI comparison: WRAP interim 2002 and CA reported 2003 • Differences in EI reporting: • Differences in point and area binning • CA reports reactive organic gases (ROG), WRAP reports volatile organic compounds (VOC) - specific pollutants differ in some cases • CA reports SOx, WRAP reports SO2 • EI comparison reasonable, consistent with known differences
EI Temporal and Spatial Resolution • 2002 interim modeling efforts utilize temporal and spatial resolution of EI data for states and boundary conditions • Level of detail of EI temporal and spatial resolution in summary products to be determined by AoH Work Group (opinions?) • Following examples can be generated for all pollutant sources/states