1 / 26

First Things First A Framework for Systemic High School Reform

Archived Information. First Things First A Framework for Systemic High School Reform. James P. Connell, Ph. D. Institute for Research and Reform in Education US Department of Education High School Summit October 8, 2003. Who Are We?. Institute for Research and Reform in Education.

claire-mcdowell
Download Presentation

First Things First A Framework for Systemic High School Reform

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ArchivedInformation First Things First A Framework for Systemic High School Reform James P. Connell, Ph. D.Institute for Research and Reform in EducationUS Department of Education High School SummitOctober 8, 2003

  2. Who Are We? Institute for Research and Reform in Education • IRRE is a not-for-profit organization • We developed First Things First, a comprehensive K-12 research-based reform framework

  3. Who Do We Work With? • Urban Districts • Kansas City, KS (all 28 elementary, eight middle and five high schools) • Kansas City, MO (all four comprehensive high schools and one magnet high school) • Riverview Gardens, MO (one urban high school and two middle schools • Houston, TX (three large high schools and four middle schools) • New Orleans, LA (10 high schools) • Rural Districts • High schools in Greenville and Shaw, MS

  4. Who Are Our “Sponsors”? • Public and private investors in educational reform • Private foundations • Carnegie Foundation • Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation • Gates Foundation • State and U.S. Departments of Education • Public school districts

  5. FTF Strategies • Small Learning Communities • Family Advocate System • Instructional Improvement

  6. Small Learning Communities (SLCs) • Over 150 SLCs now being implemented in comprehensive high schools • Implementation standards for SLCs • Small and tall • Thematic with student and teacher choice • Pure • Common planning time • Flexible allocation of resources • Collective responsibility • For student outcomes • For instructional improvement

  7. Evidence of Effectiveness • From Kansas City, Kansas • Approximately 20,000 students • 50% African American • 25% Hispanic • 20% Caucasian • 5% Other ethnic groups • Over 70% free and reduced lunch • Completed third year of district-wide implementation of FTF in 2003

  8. Student Commitment

  9. Five Year Trend In KCK -High School Attendance Rate All high schools implementing FTF ALL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOLS (N=4) Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  10. KCK Dropout Rate – Five Year Trend All high schools implementing FTF ALL COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOLS (N=4) Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  11. KCK Graduation Rate – Five Year Trend All high schools implementing SLCs COMPREHENSIVE HIGH SCHOOLS (N=4) Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  12. Strategies • Small Learning Communities • Family Advocate System • Instructional Improvement

  13. Family Advocate System (FAS) • What is it? • A commitment by all professional and other qualified staff • To work with approximately 15 students and their families • For as long as they are in the school • To ensure academic success for those students

  14. Family Advocate System (FAS) • What is it? • Structured training and ongoing support for all professional staff to: • Find and use one-on-one time with students effectively • Monitor student progress with an academic and behavioral profile • Establish regular and productive communication with parents • Conduct effective family conferences • Work with colleagues to ensure each student’s success

  15. Parent Conference Attendance In Four SLCs At One Comprehensive High School 2001-02 school year

  16. Strategies • Small Learning Communities • Family Advocate System • Instructional Improvement

  17. Instructional Improvement • Provide students who need it most • more instructional time in literacy and math, • lower student/adult ratios • attention to specific learning needs • Work with all teachers to actively engage all students with rigorous, standards-based instruction aligned with high stakes assessments

  18. Student Performance

  19. Trends In 11th Grade Reading Assessment Scores: Kansas City, Kansas High Schools Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  20. Trends In 8th Grade Reading Assessment Scores: Kansas City, Kansas Middle Schools Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  21. Trends In 5th Grade Reading Assessment Scores:Kansas City, Kansas Elementary Schools Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  22. N=905 N=3140 N=896 N=3313 Closing The Racial Achievement Gap In Kansas City, Kansas (Grade 5, 8 and 11) Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  23. N=1338 N=2721 N=1291 N=2918 Closing The Economic Achievement Gap in Kansas City, Kansas (Grades 5, 8 and 11) Source data: Kansas State Department of Education

  24. IRRE 215.545.1335 www.irre.org jpcirre@aol.com Contact Information

More Related