370 likes | 700 Views
Interpersonal Processes That Contribute to Depression. John Vitkus, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic Foundation. A Tale of Two Theories. The Interpersonal Circle Sex-Differences in Communication. Theory 1: Interpersonal Theory and The Interpersonal Circle. 1913, George Herbert Mead
E N D
Interpersonal Processes That Contribute to Depression John Vitkus, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic Foundation
A Tale of Two Theories • The Interpersonal Circle • Sex-Differences in Communication
Theory 1:Interpersonal Theory andThe Interpersonal Circle • 1913, George Herbert Mead • 1938, Harry Stack Sullivan • 1957, Timothy Leary • 1974, Lorna Benjamin • 1983, Donald Kiesler • 2002, G. Scott Acton and William Revelle
Dimension 1:Affiliation Hostile Friendly
Dimension 2: Control Dominant Submissive
A Two-Dimensional Model Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
Mapping Behaviors on the Model order meddle criticize advise scold assist attack reject love withdraw request sulk disclose apologize acquiesce obey
The Interpersonal Circumplex Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
Typical Interaction Patterns Dominant Accusing the partner Offering advice Hostile Friendly Asking for help Justifying oneself Submissive
The Principle of ComplementarityRobert Carson, 1969Any particular behavior tends to elicit a response that issimilar in its level of affiliation, butopposite in its level of control.
The Interpersonal Circle Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
Theory 2:Sex-Differences in Communication • 1990, Deborah Tannen: • You Just Don’t Understand • 1992, John Gray • Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus
For Women: • Primary motive for communication: • To establish and maintain relationships. • Primary method of communication • “rapport talk”
For Men: • Primary motive for communication: • To establish and maintain status. • Primary method of communication • “report talk”
Examples of sex-differences • Asking for directions • The speed up signal • Parenting
Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
Women conceptualize communication first along the dimension of Affiliation Hostile Friendly
Men conceptualize communication first along the dimension of Control Dominant Submissive
An example from her: “You need to watch your cholesterol.”
Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Submissive
Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Grateful compliance Submissive
What she expects to hear: “Thanks. I’ll watch what I eat. I appreciate your concern for my health.”
A woman sees affiliation . . . Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Submissive
But a man sees control . . . Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Submissive
What she sometimes hears: “Quit nagging!”
Dominant Frustrated criticism Hostile Friendly Submissive
A man sees control . . . Dominant Frustrated criticism Hostile Friendly Submissive
But a woman sees rejection . . . Dominant Frustrated criticism Hostile Friendly Submissive
Male Preference for Interpersonal Communication Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
Female Preference for Interpersonal Communication Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
A Healthy Exchange Model of Interpersonal Communication Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
An Insecure Male/Passive Female Pattern Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive
An Interpersonal/Sex-Differences Model of Depression Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive