1 / 34

Interpersonal Processes That Contribute to Depression

Interpersonal Processes That Contribute to Depression. John Vitkus, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic Foundation. A Tale of Two Theories. The Interpersonal Circle Sex-Differences in Communication. Theory 1: Interpersonal Theory and The Interpersonal Circle. 1913, George Herbert Mead

darrion
Download Presentation

Interpersonal Processes That Contribute to Depression

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Interpersonal Processes That Contribute to Depression John Vitkus, Ph.D. Cleveland Clinic Foundation

  2. A Tale of Two Theories • The Interpersonal Circle • Sex-Differences in Communication

  3. Theory 1:Interpersonal Theory andThe Interpersonal Circle • 1913, George Herbert Mead • 1938, Harry Stack Sullivan • 1957, Timothy Leary • 1974, Lorna Benjamin • 1983, Donald Kiesler • 2002, G. Scott Acton and William Revelle

  4. Dimension 1:Affiliation Hostile Friendly

  5. Dimension 2: Control Dominant Submissive

  6. A Two-Dimensional Model Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  7. Mapping Behaviors on the Model order meddle criticize advise scold assist attack reject love withdraw request sulk disclose apologize acquiesce obey

  8. A Circumplex Arrangement

  9. The Interpersonal Circumplex Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  10. Typical Interaction Patterns Dominant Accusing the partner Offering advice Hostile Friendly Asking for help Justifying oneself Submissive

  11. The Principle of ComplementarityRobert Carson, 1969Any particular behavior tends to elicit a response that issimilar in its level of affiliation, butopposite in its level of control.

  12. The Interpersonal Circle Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  13. Theory 2:Sex-Differences in Communication • 1990, Deborah Tannen: • You Just Don’t Understand • 1992, John Gray • Men are from Mars, Women are from Venus

  14. For Women: • Primary motive for communication: • To establish and maintain relationships. • Primary method of communication • “rapport talk”

  15. For Men: • Primary motive for communication: • To establish and maintain status. • Primary method of communication • “report talk”

  16. Examples of sex-differences • Asking for directions • The speed up signal • Parenting

  17. Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  18. Women conceptualize communication first along the dimension of Affiliation Hostile Friendly

  19. Men conceptualize communication first along the dimension of Control Dominant Submissive

  20. An example from her: “You need to watch your cholesterol.”

  21. Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Submissive

  22. Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Grateful compliance Submissive

  23. What she expects to hear: “Thanks. I’ll watch what I eat. I appreciate your concern for my health.”

  24. A woman sees affiliation . . . Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Submissive

  25. But a man sees control . . . Dominant Loving advice Hostile Friendly Submissive

  26. What she sometimes hears: “Quit nagging!”

  27. Dominant Frustrated criticism Hostile Friendly Submissive

  28. A man sees control . . . Dominant Frustrated criticism Hostile Friendly Submissive

  29. But a woman sees rejection . . . Dominant Frustrated criticism Hostile Friendly Submissive

  30. Male Preference for Interpersonal Communication Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  31. Female Preference for Interpersonal Communication Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  32. A Healthy Exchange Model of Interpersonal Communication Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  33. An Insecure Male/Passive Female Pattern Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

  34. An Interpersonal/Sex-Differences Model of Depression Dominant Hostile Friendly Submissive

More Related