1 / 12

Proposed Deemed Savings Values for Residential Refrigerator Recycling Programs

Proposed Deemed Savings Values for Residential Refrigerator Recycling Programs. June 7, 2005. Program Summary. Program Energy Goal – Early retirement of existing inefficient refrigerators Secondary “Non-Energy” goals Removal of “second” refrigerators from stock

darva
Download Presentation

Proposed Deemed Savings Values for Residential Refrigerator Recycling Programs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Proposed Deemed Savings Values for Residential Refrigerator Recycling Programs June 7, 2005

  2. Program Summary • Program Energy Goal – Early retirement of existing inefficient refrigerators • Secondary “Non-Energy” goals • Removal of “second” refrigerators from stock • Recycling of refrigerants, metals and other materials (PCBs)

  3. There’s Lot’s of PotentialSales Weighted Average Residential Refrigerator Energy Use

  4. Energy Savings Issues • Removal of units that were already going to be “decommissioned” • Removal of non-functioning units • Removal of units that were only used “part-time” • Replacement of “decommissioned” units with other “used” units • Interaction with space conditioning

  5. Prior Program Experience:Net Savings and Remaining Life • Net savings after adjustments for “free-ridership,” replacements, partial use, etc => • California • 2002 Evaluation- 53% - 57% • 2003 Evaluation- 35% • Colorado • 61% • Snoh PUD Pilot • 62% of gross savings • Remaining Equipment Life – 6 to 8 yrs

  6. Prior Program Experience – Gross Savings • California • 1996 = 2130 kWh/yr • 2002 = 1915 kWh/yr • 2003 = 2128 kWh/yr • Snoh PUD – 1324 kWh/yr

  7. Proposed Inputs to Deemed Savings Analysis • Average Unit Age = 24 yrs (base year = 2001) • Average Unit Consumption = 1453 kWh/yr • Remaining Unit Life = 6 years • Average Cost for Recycling = $140

  8. Net-to-Gross Adjustment • Net-to-Gross Adjustments • Unit would have been kept but not used - 6% • Unit would have been retired w/o program – 7% • Unit was only used Part-Time – 10% • Unit will be replaced w/another used unit – 11% • Space Conditioning Interaction • Inside conditioned space – 14% • Outside conditioned space – 0% • Overall Adjustment • Units not replace – 70% (40% of units) • Units replaced New Energy Star – 68% (60% of units)

  9. Proposed Deemed Value Input Assumptions • Gross Savings – 1453 kWh/yr • Net-to-Gross – 69% • Net Site Savings (All units) – 829 kWh/yr • Remaining Measure Life – 6 years • Average Unit Cost (Including utility administrative cost) - $140/unit • Units Replaced – 60% • Units not Replaced – 40%

  10. Levelized Cost for Replacements by Vintage

  11. Levelized Cost for Replacements by Vintage

  12. Proposed Deemed Values • Net Site Savings (All units) – 829 kWh/yr • Levelized Cost – 3.1 cents/kWh • B/C ratio (TRC) – 1.3 • C&RD credit - $110.81* *80% of bulk system value, PV to Utility System is $278 of which $140 is local distribution system value

More Related