1 / 13

Measuring the Value of an EA Practice

This quarterly meeting discusses the importance of measuring the value of an Enterprise Architecture (EA) practice and its impact on agency performance. It provides guidance and strategies for measuring EA program value and improving EA products and services.

davidwinter
Download Presentation

Measuring the Value of an EA Practice

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAF Quarterly Meeting Measuring the Value of an EA Practice January 31, 2007 Dick Burk Chief Architect and Manager, Federal Enterprise Architecture Program, OMB

  2. FEA Practice Guidance • Value to the Mission –Increase the value of architecture activities to improve results in agency mission areas. • Sections: • Section 1 – Introduction • Section 2 – EA Transition Strategy Guidance • Section 3 – Introducing Segment Architecture • Section 4 – Developing Segment Architecture • Section 5 – Measuring the Value of EA Programs Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  3. EA Value Measurement: Objectives • Demonstrate the value of the agency EA program • Identify opportunities to improve EA products and services • Justify the allocation of agency resources to the development and use of architectural products • Fulfill opportunities to improve EA products and services and enhance customer service Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  4. Overview • EA value measures are not intended to be used by the Federal Enterprise Architecture Program Management Office (FEA PMO) to assess the current level of EA program maturity. • One of the primary challenges of EA value measurement is to demonstrate a cause-and-effect relationship between actions within the EA program and improvements to agency performance. • In some cases, there may be many contributing factors resulting in a specific performance improvement, of which the EA program is only one. • Additionally, cause and effect may not always be proximate in time. • The EA program may identify opportunities to make IT investments influencing agency performance in future fiscal years • Appendix provides sample EA survey elements for subjective value indicators. Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  5. Topic Areas • EA program value concepts • Introduces EA value measurement as an element of the Performance Improvement Lifecycle • Describes candidate EA value measures to demonstrate the impact of EA products and services on IT investment management and program management. • Measuring EA program value • Describes a step-by-step process to define EA value measurement areas, identify measurement sources, and monitor and track value measures during each phase of the Performance Improvement Lifecycle. • Using EA program value measures • Outlines how EA value measures can be analyzed and applied to improve EA products and services to enhance business decisions Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  6. EA Program Value Concepts • Performance Improvement Lifecycle Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  7. EA Value Framework Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  8. Types of EA Value Indicators • Subjective and Objective Value Measures • Subjective value measures capture the opinions of EA stakeholders. • Objective value measures represent quantifiable EA value outcomes • Common/Shared and Agency-Specific Measures • Common/shared measures are applicable to any agency and can be used consistently across Federal agencies • Agency-specific measures apply in the context of specific agency’s goals, programs, lines of business, or other agency-specific initiatives. Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  9. Roles & Responsibilities • Chief Architect • Responsible for establishing the EA value measurement process • Engage EA stakeholders on value of EA and solicit feedback • EA Stakeholders • Provide feedback to improve EA products and services Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  10. Steps for Measuring EA Program Value • Step 1: Define Value Measurement Areas • Identify Stakeholder Communities • Identify EA Program Value Goals (Outcomes) • Common Value Indicators • Step 2: Identify Measurement Data Sources • Step 3: Execute Value Measurement • Establish Baseline • Establish Target Measures • Measure Actual Value Results Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  11. Using EA Program Value Measures • Continuous improvement and answering EA value questions • Are stakeholders satisfied with the content and level of detail of the agency EA to support business decision-making? • Does collaboration between EA program staff and business owners in developing segment architectures result in increased stakeholder satisfaction? • Does the EA Transition Strategy and integration with the CPIC process have a measurable impact on the IT investment portfolio? • Does the development and implementation of the agency EA lead to measurable improvements of agency performance milestones? • Is there a clear relationship between EA use and the implementation of business/enterprise services? • Does the agency EA and segment architecture result in measurable cost savings or cost avoidance? Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  12. Common Value Indicators Example Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

  13. For Further Information:www.egov.gov Citizen-Centered, Results Driven Government

More Related