640 likes | 772 Views
PD Team Quarterly Retreat. February 22-23, 2012. Meeting Outcomes. By the end of this session, participants will … Reflect on building capacity and ensuring fidelity (PD Team) Make design decisions about the Principal Standards module (ID Team) Discuss NC LTI and implications for our work
E N D
PD Team Quarterly Retreat February 22-23, 2012
Meeting Outcomes By the end of this session, participants will … • Reflect on building capacity and ensuring fidelity (PD Team) • Make design decisions about the Principal Standards module (ID Team) • Discuss NC LTI and implications for our work • Create training and webinars for all evaluation processes to be used this spring and load to a shared storage space • Provide feedback on the fidelity check # 2 session (PD Leads) • Review the RttT application and discuss potential modules (ID team) • Receive an overview of EVAAS • Receive an update on Educator Effectiveness information
Norms • Respectful communication as allies • Be actively involved • Focus on established goals • Assume the best of my colleagues • Thoughtully involve others.
Personal ReflectionBuilding Capacity and Ensuring Fidelity Retooling tasks and aligning outcomes
What Topics are Trending? • Going back to September, up through today • Identify the topics for which you have offered direct training/facilitated support
Clark Kent : Superman :: Bruce Wayne : • Hulk • Spiderman • Batman • Wolverine
rocket : space :: submarine : • land • sea • air • cave
Content Areas • ELA • Math • Science • Soc. Stu. • Arts Education • World Languages • Other
Teacher Skills • RBT • Text Complexity • Web 2.0 Tools • Thinkfinity
System Processes • Developing Local Curricula • Curriculum Alignment/Mapping • Instructional Design • Formative Assessment
Evaluation and Growth • Evaluation Process • Online Tool • EVAAS • Teacher Effectiveness
Review your Outlook Calendar • For each of the questions that follow, determine your individual answer. • Going back to September, up through today • Determine the response to the question. Slight estimation may be necessary
Planning PD Logisticswith my RESA Director • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Planning PD Contentwith my RESA Director • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Training Teachers at a School Session(any topic) • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Training Teachers at a District Session(any topic) • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Training at My RESA(where you were the primary presenter/facilitator) • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Training State Content Standardsfor Teachers • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Training State Content Standardsfor District Leaders • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Evaluation Process TrainingEvaluating Teachers • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Evaluation Process TrainingEvaluating Principals/Asst. Principals • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Online Tool Training • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Data Literacy Training • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
EVAAS Training • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Helping districts plan and deliver training(But you don’t deliver it) • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Planning /CoachingSchool Level • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
Planning /CoachingDistrict Level • None • 1 to 3 • 4 to 6 • More than 6
What Kind of Support? • Going back to September, up through today • To what degree have you utilized the types of communication methods that follow with the districts and leaders you serve?
Face to Face Contact • Most of the time • Often • Occasionally • Rarely • Never
Webinar/GoTo Meeting • Most of the time • Often • Occasionally • Rarely • Never
Blog • Most of the time • Often • Occasionally • Rarely • Never
Regional Wiki • Most of the time • Often • Occasionally • Rarely • Never
Eliz and Team NC Evaluation webinars
Systematic statewide support for all educators • Each small team will create a 60-90 minute webinar to be delivered statewide • Each webinar will be delivered up to 4 times during March and April • In June, each regional team will deliver an all day F2F training on the evaluation instruments in the RESA DSW slot • All team will meet with Eliz and Robert for a content validity check
Ratings • Discuss when in the process an educator is rated • Define developing, proficient, accomplished, distinguished and not demonstrated on teacher and admin tool • Discuss things to look for and potential artifacts • Review scoring the rubric • Discuss “not demonstrated” • Use vignettes to share examples
Teacher Summary Rating Sheet and other end of the year essentials • Review that the NCEES system (remove the word McREL) will lock on June 30 for teachers and administers • Show the form in NCEES and the drop down menus • Discuss when and how you rate the rubric • Review electronic signature process • Review the Record of Teacher Activities form and sign that • Quick review of ratings including “not demonstrated vs. not looked for”
Principal/AP Summary Rating Sheet and other end of the year essentials • Review that the NCEES system (remove the word McREL) will lock on June 30 for teachers and administers • Show the form in NCEES and the drop down menus • Discuss when and how you rate the rubric • Review electronic signature process • Quick review of ratings
What to expect from Standards 6 & 8 for the 2011-12 school year • Review standards 6 & 8 and how ratings will be defined • Talk about EVAAS • Discuss educator status • Review DRAFT status sheet
Teacher PDP for the 2012-13 school year • Review the form in NCEES • Discuss how the form will roll over • Talk about SMART goals; 2-3 per PDP • Review the signature process • Review how to assign a mentor and have the mentor sign • Discuss individual, monitored, and directed plans • Discuss how PDP is influenced by self-assessment and where it is discussed in the process
Principal/AP Summary Goal Form for the 2012-13 school year • Review the form in NCEES • Discuss how the form will roll over • Talk about SMART goals; 2-3 per Summary Goal form • Review the signature process • Review the comprehensive needs assessment • Discuss how SGF is influenced by self-assessment and where it is discussed in the process
https://rt3ncshare.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/ Where to share
Greg and team EVAAS
Scaffolding for Success Reflect slides
Scaffolding for SuccessReleasing responsibility as capacity grows LEA/Charter Common Core & Essential Standards ERD/ PD Leads External
Scaffolding for SuccessAccepting responsibility as capacity grows TOPS/NCSU Online Module Development DPI/ERD/IDEA Internal
Scaffolding for SuccessReleasing responsibility as capacity grows 2011 2014 Common Core & Essential Standards EVAAS Data Literacy Standards 6 and 8 Online Tool Evaluation Process
Evidence of Capacity Topic/Skill/Action ERD/ PD Leads LEA/Charter What examples from your region can you share?
Planning for Capacity What actions will you take to release responsibility? ERD/ PD Leads LEA/Charter What is your highest priority?
NCLTIBuilding Capacity for Technology Enabled Learning What actions will we take to build capacity? NCDPI LEA/Charter Tools/Topic/Skill/Action
Boiler Plate Disclaimer • The digital tools used during the course of the NCDPI Summer Institute 2012 have been helpful to some educators across the state. However, due to the rapidly changing digital environment, NCDPI does not represent nor endorse that these tools are the exclusive digital tools for the purposes outlined during the Summer Institute.