1 / 1

Michael Brannick , Mark Grichanik, Stanley Nazian , Monika Wahi , and Steven Goldin

Emotional Intelligence and Medical School Performance: A Prospective Multivariate Study. Michael Brannick , Mark Grichanik, Stanley Nazian , Monika Wahi , and Steven Goldin. Results. Introduction. Medical school performance is a broad and multi-faceted criterion.

derick
Download Presentation

Michael Brannick , Mark Grichanik, Stanley Nazian , Monika Wahi , and Steven Goldin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Emotional Intelligence and Medical School Performance: A Prospective Multivariate Study Michael Brannick, Mark Grichanik, Stanley Nazian, Monika Wahi, and Steven Goldin Results Introduction • Medical school performance is a broad and multi-faceted criterion. • Current cognitive and non-cognitive predictors of medical school success include undergraduate (science, overall) GPAs, MCAT scores, personality tests, written personal statements, letters of recommendation, SJTs and interviews. • Emotional intelligence (EI) has become an increasingly popular choice for predicting success in health service occupations. • Present Study: • 1) Compare the ability of a self-report and an ability-based EI measure to predict facets of medical school performance, and • 2) Determine whether the EI measures increment prediction beyond conventional instruments. Method • Participants: • Three cohorts of medical students (those anticipated to graduate in 2009, 2010, and 2011) from the USF Morsani College of Medicine (N=377) were invited to participate in their first or secondyear. N = 209 (55%) students signed consent forms. • Demographics: 56% female, 42% male. Mean age = 23.52 (SD=2.84). • 13 % Asian; 3% Black or African-American; 9% Hispanic; 55% White; 20% Unreported. Registrar’s records indicate that this sample appears fairly representative of the population being studied. Correlations shown above where p <.05 are bold. If the regression weight for the variable was significant in a simultaneous regression, the correlation is shown in italic. Discussion • Max Performance: MCAT and undergraduate GPA were predictive of measures of success. • Personality measures were associated with some criteria • Conscientiousness was associated with better grades. • Extroversion was negatively related to success, particularly early on. • Of the EI measures, only the MSCEIT (ability-based measure) showed significant relations withany measures of success. • Neither measure of EI showed an incremental improvement in prediction beyond conventional ability and personality tests. • Criterion issues: • Problems with interpersonal measures. • Short vs. long term outcomes. • Predictor issues: • Changes in MCAT • EI constructs Predictor Measures: Criterion Measures: • Big-Five Personality6: • Neuroticism • Extroversion • Openness to Exp. • Agreeableness • Conscientiousness • Medical School GPA averaged across all graded classes, by year: • Year 1 + Year 2 (r=0.7) • Year 3 • Year 4 • Ability-based EI (MSCEIT)4: • Emotional Perception • Facilitating Thought • Understand Emotions • Managing Emotions • Overall EI • US Medical Licensing Exam: • Step 1 (end of Year 2): • Science • Step 2 (end of Year 3): • CK: Medical Knowledge • CS: not used • MCAT Average: • Verbal Reasoning • Biological Sciences • Physical Sciences • Clinical Performance Exam: • CPX administered over two different cohorts at the end of the third year • 12 stations: Multiple encounters with standardized patients. • Self-report EI (WLEIS)5: • Self-Emotional Appraisal • Emot. Appraisal of Others • Use of Emotion • Regulation of Emotion • Overall EI • Please address all correspondence to: • mbrannick@usf.edu • mgrichanik@ • mail.usf.edu For a copy of the full abstract and poster: • Overall Undergraduate GPA and Science GPA highly correlated (r=0.9) • Used Overall Undergraduate GPA • Assess patient interaction, quality and appropriateness of history taking and physical exam, and ability to develop a differential diagnosis. • Scores summed across stations Summary: EI measures did not increment prediction beyond existing predictors of medical school success

More Related