120 likes | 361 Views
Reliability Analysis of DSRC Wireless Communication for Vehicle Safety Applications. Fan Bai and Hariharan Krishnan General Motors Corporation. Presented by Long Vu CS598JH – Fall 07. Vehicle Safety Communication through Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC).
E N D
Reliability Analysis of DSRC Wireless Communication for Vehicle Safety Applications Fan Bai and Hariharan Krishnan General Motors Corporation Presented by Long Vu CS598JH – Fall 07
Vehicle Safety Communication through Dedicated Short Range Communication (DSRC) How Reliable is the Dedicated Short Range Communication?
Reliability of Dedicated Short Range Communication No information about traffic/obstacle on the real freeway • Two Experimental Setups • Real Freeway (many obstacles) • Test (in General Motors – no obstacle) • Performed 3 times • Car Equipments • 802.11p-based DSRC radio • Directional antenna • GPS devices • Application to exchange and display messages • Experiment Execution • Cars periodically broadcast each 0.1 (s) (location, velocity, braking status, …) • Cars within 300m can capture • Record a log file
Next… Recall: How Reliable is Dedicated Short Range Communication? • Reliability of DSRC in Link Layer • Packet Delivery Ratio • Distribution of Consecutive Packet Drops • Reliability of DSRC in Application Layer • Tolerance Time Window • Reliability of DSRC in Application Layer • Relationship between Link Layer Reliability Application Layer Reliability
Reliability of DRSC in Link Layer (1) • Packet Delivery Ratio • #successful received packets/ #total transmitted packets Freeway Test • Test environment has better performance • Freeway is a harsh environment for DSRC
Reliability of DRSC in Link Layer (2) • Distribution of Consecutive Packet Drops P(1 packet dropped) = 4/6 P(2 packets dropped) = 2/6 Freeway Test • DSRC doesn’t have burst most of the time • Packet drop has the memory less property
Next… Recall: How Reliable is Dedicated Short Range Communication? • Reliability of DSRC in Link Layer • Packet Delivery Ratio • Distribution of Consecutive Packet Drops • Reliability of DSRC in Application Layer • Tolerance Time Window • Reliability of DSRC in Application Layer • Relationship between Link Layer Reliability Application Layer Reliability
Tolerance Time Window T • In application perspective, packet loss is acceptable • Within a period of time T, at least one packet should be received successfully application is reliable • T in the range of [0.3 sec, 1.0 sec] • Application Reliability: Probability of receiving at least one packet from sender during T
Reliability of DSRC in Application Layer • Experiment • At each time t0, app checks whether a packet is received during [t0-T, t0] • Record locations of sender and receiver Freeway Test
Relationship between Link Layer and Application Layer Reliability • T: Tolerance Time Window • t: broadcast interval (t = 0.1s) • M: # packets broadcasted during T (M=T/t) d • Pcomm(d): prob. of successfully receiving each packet at distance d in Link layer • Papp(d): prob. of successfully receiving at least one packet at distance d in Application layer, during a Tolerance Time Window T
Relationship between Link Layer and Application Layer Reliability • Assumption: packet drops are independent • Pcomm(d): prob. of successfully receiving each packet at distance d in Link layer • Papp(d): prob. of successfully receiving at least one packet at distance d in Application layer, during a Tolerance Time Window T • Papp(d)= 1 – Pr(receiving no packets from M consecutively sent packets during T) Papp(d)= 1 – [1-Pcomm(d)]M = 1 – [1-Pcomm(d)]T/t
Lessons to Take Home • Pros • The first reliability measurement of DSRC for Vehicle Safety Communication Applications • Real experiments with highways • Analysis model of reliability of DSRC between Link Layer and Application Layer • Independent packet drop • Cons • The analysis can’t be applied for Commerce and Convenience Applications • No highway traffic information