1 / 17

Compiler Optimization-Space Exploration

Compiler Optimization-Space Exploration. Authors Spyridon Triantafyllis , Manish Vachharajani , Neil Vachharajani , David I. August. Adrian Pop IDA/PELAB adrpo@ida.liu.se. Outline. Introduction The Problem: Predictive Heuristics and A Priori Evaluation Some Solutions:

doris
Download Presentation

Compiler Optimization-Space Exploration

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Compiler Optimization-SpaceExploration Authors Spyridon Triantafyllis, Manish Vachharajani, Neil Vachharajani, David I. August Adrian Pop IDA/PELAB adrpo@ida.liu.se

  2. Outline • Introduction • The Problem: • Predictive Heuristics and A Priori Evaluation • Some Solutions: • Iterative Compilation and A Posteriori Evaluation • Our Solution • Optimization-Space Exploration • Evaluation • Conclusion

  3. Introduction • Processors • become more complex • incorporate additional computational resources • Consequence • Compilers • become more complex • use aggressive optimizations • have to use predictive heuristics in order to decide where and to what extend optimizations should be applied

  4. The Problem: Predictive Heuristics • Predictive Heuristics • tries to determine a priori the benefits of certain optimization • are tuned to give the highest average performance • The Result • significant performance gains are unrealized!

  5. Some Solutions: Iterative Compilation • Iterative Compilation • optimize the programs in many ways • choose a posteriori the best code version • Pitfall of current schemes • prohibitive compilation times! • limitation to specific architectures • embedded systems • limited to specific optimizations

  6. Our solution: Optimization-Space Exploration • OSE Compiler (Practical Iterative Compilation) • explores the space of optimization configurations through multiple compilations • it uses the experience of the compiler writer to prune the number of configurations that should be explored • uses a performance estimator to not evaluate the code by execution • selects a custom configuration for each code segment • selects next optimization configuration by examining the previous configurations characteristics

  7. OSE over many conigurations

  8. OSE – Limiting the Search Space • Optimization Space • derived from a set of optimization parameters • Optimization Parameters • Optimization level • High Level Optimization (HLO) level • Micro-architecture type • Coalesce adjacent loads and stores • HLO phase order • Loop unroll limit • Update dependencies after unrolling • Perform software pipelining

  9. OSE – Limiting the Search Space • Optimization Parameters • Heuristic to disable software pipelining • Allow control speculation during software pipelining • Software pipeline outer loops • Enable if-conversion heuristic for software pipelining • Software pipeline loops with early exists • Enable if conversion • Enable non-standard predication • Enable pre-scheduling • Scheduler ready criterion

  10. OSE – Limiting the Search Space • Compiler Construction-time Pruning • limit the total number of configurations that will be considered at compile time • construct a set S with at most N configurations • S is chosen by determining the impact on a representative set of code segments C as follows: • S’ = default configuration + configurations with non-default parameters • a) run C compiled with S’ on real hardware and retain in S’ only the valuable configurations • b) consider the combination of configurations in S’ as S’’ repeat a) for S’’ and retain only the best N configurations • repeat b) until no new configurations can be generated or the speedup does not improve

  11. OSE – Limiting the Search Space • Characterizing Configuration Correlations • build a optimization configuration tree • critical configurations = conf. at the same level 1. Construct O = set of m most important configurations in S for all code segments in C 2. Choose all oi in O as the successor of the root node. 3. For each configurations oi in O: 4. Construct Ci = {cj: argmax(pj,k) = i} k=1…m 5. Repeat steps 3, 4 to find oi successors limiting the code segments to Ci and configurations to S\O.

  12. OSE – Limiting the Search Space • Compile-time search • do a breadth first search on the optimization configuration tree • choose the configuration that yields the best estimated performance

  13. OSE – Limiting the Search Space • Limit the OSE application • to hot code segments • hot code segments are identified through profiling or hardware performance counters during a program run

  14. Evaluation • OSE Compiler Algorithm 1. Profile the code 2. For each Function: 3. Compile to the high level IR 4. Optimize using HLO 5. For each Function: 6. If the function is hot: 7. Perform OSE on second HLO and CG 8. Emit the function using the best configuration 9. If the function is not hot use the standard configuration

  15. Compile-time Performance Estimation • Model Based on: • Ideal Cycle Count – T • Data cache performance, Lambda, L • Instruction cache performance, I • Branch misprediction, B

  16. Results

  17. Conclusions

More Related