1 / 24

Tau Neutrinos in IceCube

Tau Neutrinos in IceCube. Advantages of tau neutrinos Tau neutrino signatures in IceCube Or: Double Bangs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg Results from initial “toy” Monte Carlo studies. 1 PeV n t  t X, t  mnn. Advantages of Tau Neutrinos.

dusan
Download Presentation

Tau Neutrinos in IceCube

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Tau Neutrinos in IceCube • Advantages of tau neutrinos • Tau neutrino signatures in IceCube • Or: Double Bangs Are Just the Tip of the Iceberg • Results from initial “toy” Monte Carlo studies 1 PeV nttX, tmnn D. Cowen/Penn State

  2. Advantages of Tau Neutrinos • At high energies (E > ~1 TeV), nt are a virtually background-free source of cosmological neutrinos • Sources of nt which will give negligibly small fluxes: • atmospheric nt from atmospheric ne and/or nm`oscillations • oscillations small at these energies • “prompt” atmospheric nt from charm decay • Only faraway accelerators that produce neutrinos as ne:nm:nt::1:2:0 can, through neutrino oscillations, produce appreciable numbers of tau neutrinos at IceCube • flux ratio at earth is ~1:1:1 • Tau flavor is a very clean tag for cosmological neutrino origin D. Cowen/Penn State

  3. More Advantages of Tau Neutrinos • Energy resolution • can be comparable to that of ne • Pointing resolution • can be comparable to that of nm • Acceptance • varies from ~2p to ~4p, depending on tau decay channel • tau neutrino regeneration in the earth allows UHE nt to penetrate and emerge at ~1014-15 eV • leads to 4p acceptance at E(nt) < ~1014-15 eV • Rich set of signatures allows for • better background rejection • self-consistency checks • e.g., measurements of the same neutrino flux with different systematics D. Cowen/Penn State

  4. Quick Overview of IceCube • Over 70 strings, L~1km, total V~1km3 • 60 Digital Optical Modules (DOMs) per string • Deployed at depths of 1450-2450m at South Pole • Completion slated for 2011 • Currently have 9 strings deployed • partially surrounding AMANDA; eventually will completely surround • in principle already sensitive to some nt channels • [see talk by K. Hanson for more details about IceCube detector] D. Cowen/Penn State

  5. Capabilities of IceCube DOMs • Each DOM, a standalone computer, has • built-in set of digitizers (very important for detection of tau neutrinos) • fast ones: 3 different gain levels, ~3ns sampling period, ~400ns depth (128 samples) • slow one: 25ns sampling period, 6.4ms depth (256 samples) • built-in, remotely programmable, calibration light source (can be used to simulate tau neutrinos) • few nanosecond time resolution • distinguish light pulses from individual nt–induced cascades D. Cowen/Penn State

  6. Tau Neutrino Signatures in IceCube: Overview nt nt t t nt t nt t nt t m DOM Waveform nt t m nm nt Decreasing IceCube Acceptance Energy  D. Cowen/Penn State

  7. Lollipop nt t D. Cowen/Penn State

  8. Inverted Lollipop nt t D. Cowen/Penn State

  9. Sugardaddy nt t m See talk by T. DeYoung D. Cowen/Penn State

  10. Double Bang nt t D. Cowen/Penn State

  11. Double Pulse nt t DOM Waveform D. Cowen/Penn State

  12. Low Etm Lollipop t m nm nt D. Cowen/Penn State

  13. Tau Channels in IceCube D. Cowen/Penn State

  14. “Toy” MC Studies of Tau Neutrinos in IceCube • Many of the channels mentioned here are under active investigation • Using very simple MC at present • no actual tau decay—we fake it for now • no full detector simulation—but geometry and timing resolution are reasonably accurate • Initial goal is to do feasibility studies • if a signal is not detectable under these idealized circumstances, it will not be detectable under more realistic circumstances D. Cowen/Penn State

  15. Double Pulse Channel nt t DOM Waveform • Look at tagging efficiency using a toy simulation, full km3: • place first cascade randomly in box ±200m from detector center with E = 0.25 E(nt) • Tau travels in same direction as initial nt and then decays following the expected lifetime • Tau decays to an electron with E = 0.42 E(nt) • Look at variety of energies and zenith angles • Calculate time separation Dt detected at one (or more) DOMs purely geometrically(i.e. no scattering); • For this study, we require large enough Dt to consider a two-pulse waveform to be detectable and • we crudely simulate scattering by varying a cut on the shower-to-DOM distance D. Cowen/Penn State

  16. Double Pulse Channel • Cuts (>=1 or >=2 DOMs): • cut1: r<70m && 30<Dt<300ns (~ignores scattering, optimistic Dt) • cut2: r<70m && 60<Dt<300ns (~ignores scattering, conservative Dt) • cut3: r<35m && 30<Dt<300ns (~no scattering, optimistic Dt) • cut4: r<35m && 60<Dt<300ns (~no scattering, conservative Dt) Pat Toale, Penn State • (Efficiency is basically flat as a function of zenith angle to tau track) D. Cowen/Penn State

  17. Double Pulse Channel • Here is what a fully simulated waveform looks like for a 75 TeV tau (~300 TeV nt) • designing a robust algorithm for identifying the two separate pulses is underway (and should not be terribly hard for cases like this) cascade 1 cascade 2 sum  MC truth Light from two cascades from 75 TeV tau in a single DOM (5mV=1p.e.) D. Cowen/Penn State

  18. Lollipop Channels nt nt t t 50 TeV nt • The lollipop channels consist of a cascade and a track in the same event • For an initial feasibility study, we simulate a cascade followed by a muon, using the average Ec and Em energies expected for a tmnn decay • Investigate whether or not we can reconstruct such a “hybrid” event • reconstruct cascade and muon as distinct entities • Use full detector simulation D. Cowen/Penn State

  19. Lollipop Channels nt t • In the topology under study • the early high- multiplicity- photon hits will come mainly from the cascade • the later low-multiplicity hits will come mainly from the muon • This is borne out by the MC: multiplicity (p.e.) time (ns) D. Cowen/Penn State

  20. Lollipop Channels • Initial findings are that • the muon reconstructs well even if the fitter is given all hit DOMs (including those from the cascade) • here, “tagged” = space angle is within ~6o of true direction • the cascade reconstructs better if it is only given the earlier hits • here, “tagged” = vertex position within ~50 m of true vertex D. Cowen/Penn State

  21. Lollipop Channels • Estimate of tagging efficiency vs. E Seon-Hee Seo, Penn State D. Cowen/Penn State

  22. Sugardaddy Channel • This channel relies on seeing an increase in track brightness produced by tmnn • probably background-free signal • tracks from background processes should only decrease in brightness along their lengths • expect brightness increase of 3x to 7x • see Ty DeYoung’s talk for details • Toy simulation uses single muon track that is overlaid with 2 or 6 additional collinear muon tracks about halfway along its length D. Cowen/Penn State

  23. Sugardaddy Channel “decay” at -100m • Toy simulation of 10 PeV tau lepton • use 1 PeV muon • overlay with additional 1PeV m tracks to mimic decay tmnn • Look at number of hit DOMs as a function of length along the track(s) 7x number of DOMs hit 4x Dawn Williams, Penn State no “decay” distance along track (m) D. Cowen/Penn State

  24. Conclusions • Many different tau decay channels are accessible to large-scale UHE neutrino detectors (not just IceCube) • tau neutrinos can be relatively background-free as a signal for cosmological neutrino detection • tagging efficiencies are reasonably high • different tau neutrino channels can be compared to one another as a valuable systematic check • Initial studies are encouraging • more detailed Monte Carlo studies are underway • Ultimately, expect to have sensitivity to tau neutrinos at energies 1-2 orders of magnitude below and many orders of magnitude above the better-known double bang channel D. Cowen/Penn State

More Related