230 likes | 401 Views
Localized Magnetic States in Metals. Miyake Lab. Akiko Shiba. Ref.) P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 41. Contents. Introduction Experimental Data Calculation Hamiltonian Unrestricted Hartree – Fock Approximation Magnetic Case Nonmagnetic Case Summary. No localized moment.
E N D
Localized Magnetic States in Metals Miyake Lab. Akiko Shiba Ref.) P. W. Anderson, Phys. Rev. 124 (1961) 41
Contents • Introduction • Experimental Data • Calculation • Hamiltonian • Unrestricted Hartree –Fock Approximation • Magnetic Case • Nonmagnetic Case • Summary
No localized moment Moment per Fe in Bohr magnetons localized moment Electron Concentration Experimental Data Magnetic moments of Fe impurity Depend on the host metal Susceptibility: Ref.)A.M.Clogston et al., Phys.Rev.125,541(1962)
free-electron system repulsive interaction Ed+U U εF s-d hybridization V where Ed Hamiltonian Many-body problem d-states
ε nd↑=nd↓ No localized moment DOS of conduction electrons Simple Limit: U=0 No coulomb correlation εF Ed Ed Δ Δ
ε Ed+U εF Coulomb repulsive Ed Localized moment appears Simple Limit:Vdk=Vkd=0 No s-d hybridization Ed<εF Ed+U>εF
ε ε Ed+U Ed εF εF Ed+U Ed No localized moment Simple Limit:Vdk=Vkd=0 No s-d hybridization
is very small, Assume that Hartree-Fock Approximation δ↑ constant
One-electron Hamiltonian Hartree-Fock Hamiltonian Eσ
DOS of conduction electrons DOS of d-electrons Resolvent Green Function: where
DOS of d-electrons Lorentzian ρd(ε) Δ ε Ed
Important parameters! Self-consistent equation Number of d-electrons: Introduce :Self-consistent equation
Non-magnetic State (Self-consistency plot) Non-magnetic solution 0.5 Non-magnetic Solution 0.5
Magnetic solutions Magnetic solutions Magnetic State (Self-consistency plot) 0.5 Non-magnetic solution 0.5
magnetic non-magnetic <n> vs. y=U/Δ (symmetric) ε Ed+U εF Ed
magnetic non-magnetic <n> vs. y=U/Δ (asymmetric) ε Ed+U εF Ed
Non-magnetic conditions: x near 0 Magnetic x not small or too near 1 • Magnetic conditions: Phase diagram x
ε Assume Δ Ed+U εF Ed Non-magnetic Case (symmetric) use the approximation: then
ε Δ x near 0 Ed+U Ed εF Non-magnetic Case (asymmetric) Opposite limit: Valence fluctuation
Assume then x not small or too near 1 Magnetic Case ε Δ Ed+U εF Ed
Summary • The Coulomb correlation among d-electrons at the impurity site is important to understand the appearance of magnetic moment. • The existence of magnetic moments depends on ‘x’ and ‘y’. ε ε ε Ed+U εF εF εF Ed