160 likes | 302 Views
EUROHEAT & POWER CLIMESPACE PRESENTATION. Cooling – The New Market Dimension. Paris District Cooling Network. Cooling – The New Market Dimension. Contents : Growing demand of cooling in Europe Paris Cooling Network Advantages and Environemental impact. Growing Demand in Europe.
E N D
EUROHEAT & POWER CLIMESPACE PRESENTATION
Cooling – The New Market Dimension Paris District Cooling Network
Cooling – The New Market Dimension • Contents : • Growing demand of cooling in Europe • Paris Cooling Network • Advantages and Environemental impact
Growing Demand in Europe • Market share of district cooling in Europe is between 2 to 3 TWh cooling • DC should be able to take 25 % share of market, which can be between 500 and 700 TWh in 2012 • Why Such an interest ? • The case of Paris
Company • Concessionaire for Paris City since 1991 • Turnover in 2003 : 37 M€ • Turnover in 2004 : 43 M€ • Turnover in 2005 : 50 M€ • Shareholders : • Cofathec : 50 % • Elyo : 28 % • CPCU : 22 % • Investments since 1991 : 273 M€ • Staff : 76 people. Groupe SUEZ Groupe GdF
Network • Power : 33 MW • Industrial chillers • Including 20 MWh for ice storage • Cooling Tower • Power : 8 MW • Cooling Tower • Power : 42 MW • Indusrtial chillers • Ice Storage under construction • Cooling Tower • Under construction : 52 MW • Industrial chillers • Free cooling • River Cooling • Power : 52 MW • Industrial chillers • River Cooling • Capacity : 12 000 m3 • Equivalent installed power : 10 MW • Power : 33 MW • Industrial chillers • River Cooling
Connected power {275 MW 260 235 210 185 160 MW 135 110 85 60 35 10 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 Years
Environnemental Comparison between Paris Network and Conventional cooling • Climespace • 5 Sites • 1 Network • 400 Clients Conventional Cooling - 400 conventional Chillers Studies asked to an independant university specialized in cooling solution (Armines) Comparison : Electric consumption Frigorific gases impact Global Nuisances : Water Chemical Product Sanitary Risk Noise Visual Impact Local Nuisances : Architecture constraint Space saving
Comparison Between Climespace Network and owned conditionning system • Method : • Analyze of Climespace Network performance • Electricity cnsumption • Energy sold • Frigorific gases leakage • Analyze of Climespace Client profile and Consumption • Comparison : • ARMINES took figures of conventional chillers per client profile • ARMINES made a model changing all our client putting adapted conventional chillers, corresponding to their consumption profile
Total Equivalent Warming Impact • This index determines CO2 impact, taking into account: • Direct effect: frigorific gases leakage (measure for CLIMESPACE, and estimation for conventional chillers) • Indirect effect: Electricity consumption (Climespace consumption / performance data for conventional chillers)
Water and chemical products Consumption • Water consumed by Climespace / consumption estimated for autonomous chillers with cooling tower
Global Environnemental Impact Electrical Consumption - 20% Global Nuisances Frigorific Gas Impact - 30% TEWI (Total Equivalent Warming impact) -30% Water Consumption - 55 % - 80% Chimical Product
Local Environnemental Impact Sanitary Risk Noise reduction Visual Impact Local Nuisances Architectural Impact Space Saving