330 likes | 557 Views
Accountability for Safety. Don Fronk, Safety Programs Manager Susan Rutan, Manager Human Resources Office of Physical Plant, The Pennsylvania State University. Objectives . Provide a framework for developing a safety accountability program
E N D
Accountability for Safety Don Fronk, Safety Programs Manager Susan Rutan, Manager Human Resources Office of Physical Plant, The Pennsylvania State University
Objectives • Provide a framework for developing a safety accountability program • Share our story – what we have done, the impact & lessons learned • Motivate YOU to enhance or develop a safety accountability program
Program Agenda • Create a common understanding of accountability (What?) • The case for safety accountability (Why?) • The basic steps for growing safety accountability (How?) • The players (Who?) • Our Story • Discussion
Understanding Accountability (The What) • Personal accountability • Workplace accountability • Safety accountability
The Case for Safety Accountability (The Why) • Safety accountability helps protect people • Accountability for safety moves the culture forward
Basic framework for safety accountability (The How) • Leadership commitment • Safety programs THE FOUNDATION - • Robust training & education SAFETY CULTURE • Employee involvement • Clear expectations and roles SAFETY ACCOUNTABILITY • Encouragement and enforcement MODEL
Players in developing safety accountability (The Who) • Senior management • HR management – if not part of senior management • Safety management & staff • Mid-management • Front line supervisors • Union – depending on contractual language • Employee (safety committees)
Penn State Office of Physical Plant Story • The foundation – growing our safety culture • Senior leadership focused on safety & communication of the commitment • Safety programs developed, documented, communicated & available • Robust training & informational programs • Employee involvement
Senior Leadership Commitment • OPP Vision Statement – We are recognized nationally for excellence in facilities, environmental & safety management. • OPP Guiding Principles – We provide an enjoyable, healthy, and safe work environment. • OPP Quality Service Action Plan – Safe Environment (Providing for the health and safety of people and the environment through daily work processes, environmental protection, maintenance practices, and facilities design.
Senior Leadership Commitment • OPP Performance Criteria • Resource Commitment • 4 full-time safety professionals (for 1300 FTE workforce) • Org-wide funding set-aside for safety (programmatic & facilities) • Unit operational budgets funded for safety training
Safety Programs • Safety program development and review teams include employees • Safety programs accessible on the web upon implementation
Safety Programs • Electrical Safety / Arc Flash • Control of Hazardous Energy • Excavation Safety • Confined Space • Fall Protection • Scaffolding
Robust Safety Training & Information • OSHA awareness training for all employees • OSHA 30 hour outreach training for all trades supervisors, managers and project leaders • OSHA 10 hour outreach training for design staff • Safety awareness training for new employees • Ongoing programmatic training (trade specific) and annual refreshers • Supervisor’s toolbox talks and bi-monthly safety training topics
Employee Involvement • ISP Participation • 92 hourly employees involved • Employees empowered to make decisions regarding safe work • Hazard assessments • Safety improvements to the work environment • PPE selection
THE OPP SAFETY ACCOUNTABILTY MODEL • The Safety Accountability Matrix • The Mechanism for Accountability
Building the Model of Safety Accountability • The Safety Accountability Matrix - Clarify expectations & roles • Identified the roles & expectations for each safety program area • Developed matrix
Building the Model of Safety Accountability • Develop mechanisms for accountability • Developed parameters for enforcement • Utilized existing employee recognition program • Get senior leadership buy-in on model & parameters for enforcement
OPP Parameters for Enforcement • Conversation (undocumented) • 1st violation of most PPE usage (except Flash gear and Fall Protection) • Letter of conversation • 2nd violation of most PPE usage (accumulated for any type of PPE violation) • Failure to follow safety policy or procedure • Warning letter • Failure to wear PPE to that could result in serious injury or death (w/ last chance warning) • Failure to follow safety procedures that could result in serious injury or death (w/ last chance warning) • Repeated or willful violations of safety policies or procedures (accumulated for any type of violation) • Summary dismissal/dismissal • Willfully engaging in behavior that creates a life/safety hazard for themselves or others • Repeat violations of safety policies or procedures (3 active WL language) • Repeat violation of those things listed under W.L. with last chance warning
Launching the Safety Accountability Model • Communication with all supervisors (train the trainer format) • Communication with union leadership • Supervisors communicated safety responsibility matrix with all employees
Growing the Culture of Safety Accountability • Highlight in new employee orientation • Hold employees accountable under the model • Review and update of Safety Responsibility Matrix • Train new supervisors on the model and parameters for enforcement
Impact of Safety Accountability Model • Positive trend of injury reduction • Increase of safety reports by employees • Demonstrates organizational focus on safety • Forces clarity in safety programs and policies
Increase in safety reports • Employee safety reports have increased over the last several years
Impact of Safety Accountability Model • Positive trend of injury reduction • Increase of safety reports by employees • Demonstrates organizational focus on safety • Forces clarity in safety programs and policies
Lesson Learned • Keep safety staff out of enforcement • Supervisor/manager input on parameters for enforcement • Ensure training reflects expectations and document attendance • Highlights supervisors who are reluctant to hold employees accountable • Holding injured employees accountable is really tough