580 likes | 692 Views
AASHE Annual Conference – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania October 10, 2011. Communicate To Persuade Bill Dillon. Qualifications. Background. Expectations:. Let’s see some hands…. How many of you have ever been actively involved in a major negotiation?. None of none of the above.
E N D
AASHE Annual Conference – Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania October 10, 2011 • Communicate • To • Persuade • Bill Dillon
Let’s see some hands…. • How many of you have ever been actively involved in a major negotiation?
None of none of the above • So I’ll assume that the rest of you have never……. • Ask for a raise • Been asked for a raise • Bought a car • Planned a vacation with a spouse • Been a parent of a five year old child • Been a five year old child
Youare about to begin an important negotiation. Your objective is to ______?
Traditional negotiations continuum: • Competitive Collaborative Cooperative
Negotiations Continuum • Competitive “Let’s work together to create a bigger pie” Collaborative “We’ll divide the pie fairly” Cooperative “I win – You lose”
Even in a traditional negotiation your objectives should be twofold: • Competitive Elevate the relationship Collaborative Cooperative Achieve immediate objective
Learning outcomes for this session • Focus on elevating the relationship
Now that we will all be focusing on elevating relationships…. • Negotiation • Persuasion or • Communication
Persuasion begins by identifying where your relationship is on the continuum. • Competitive Collaborative Cooperative
Where is this on the continuum? Ben Stiller & Hank Azaria – Night at the Museum: Battle of the Smithsonian
Interest in approving one’s persuasion skills dates back to the 4th century B.C. • Aristotle described three devices that classified a speaker’s persuasive appeal: • Ethos (authority) – qualified to speak • Pathos (emotion) – ability to connect with the other party • Logos ( logic) - the clarity of the claim, the effectiveness of supporting evidence
A key take-away from the literature…. • There are certain behaviors that tend to trigger automatic responses in others. In negotiations theory these behaviors are called tactics. Whether intentional or unintentional, tactics advance immediate objectives. Tactics usually do not elevate relationships.
A first group of tactics focus on basic emotions…… • Confrontation Threat Tease Position
Something as simple as where you sit during a conversation is important. Chevy Chase & Brian Doyle – National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation
A first group of tactics focus on basic emotions…… • Confrontation Threat Tease Position Flinch
Is there any doubt about who is in charge? Michael Kaufman & Brian Doyle – National Lampoon’s Christmas Vacation
When you are in a position of authority how might you minimize emotional factors to elevate the relationship ? • Create a neutral environment • Ask first for input from others before sharing your ideas • Specifically state that you value the other person’s opinion
A second group of tactics attempt to cast the speaker as powerless…. • Confrontation Messenger Threat Never get approved Third-party pressure Tease Violins Position Deadline Flinch
How many tactics do you recognize here? Elliott Gould – Devil and Max Devlin
A third group of tactics rely more on the appearance of being reasonable or logical . • Confrontation Messenger Foggy memory Threat Never get approved Brackets Third-party pressure Tease Violins Fair & reasonable Position Deadline Expert information Flinch
One of the most commonly used tactics is... Michael Douglas & Charlie Sheen – Wall Street
Learning outcomes for this session • Focus on elevating the relationship. • Tactics only work if the receiving party is not aware of them.
Tactics as Counter-tactics • Never get approved • Deadline • Competition • Limited authority • Brackets • Third-party pressure • Fair and reasonable
But remember our goal: • Elevatethe relationship Achieve immediate objective
More Effective Countermeasures • Disclose feelings • Legitimacy • Cesura
Disclose Feelings • Disclose personal feelings, then • ask for help understanding
Disclose Feelings • Scenario: It is 4:00 pm on Friday afternoon and a colleague comes into your office to ask if you could help them build a PowerPoint presentation for a recycling initiative that they have been working on for months. The presentation is due on Monday. You have promised your significant other that you will take them to the beach this weekend.
Legitimacy • Depersonalize the issue • Strengthen your position with • Reputation • Expertise • Data
Legitimacy • Scenario: The Dean of Engineering stops by your office with drawings for her new academic resources center. The plan requires that you relocate a recycling station that you have been working on for two years. You have no other space available for this station. The Dean indicates that she wants to begin construction by the end of the week.
Cesura One
Cesura Two
Cesura Three
Cesura Four
Cesura Five
Cesura Six
Cesura Seven
Cesura Eight
Cesura Nine
Cesura Ten
Cesura Scenario: A direct report asks you for permission to take a sick day tomorrow but you already overheard her making plans to go to a baseball game. When you explain that you really need her at work she gets angry and accuses you of being tougher on her than other co-workers.
Learning outcomes for this session • Focus on elevating the relationship. • Tactics only work if the receiving party is not aware of them. • Practice positive countermeasures
A little practice….. • Scenario: You are the Sustainability Director for a mid-sized university. You have been working on your budget for months and do not believe that it is possible to fulfill your responsibilities without a 2% increase in your budget for the following year. • In a private meeting with the Chair of the Faculty Senate, she advises you, “the faculty voted last night to recommend cutting funding for sustainability initiatives by 50% to fund an increase of 4 to 6% for faculty salaries this year. ”
Now the fourth session outcome and perhaps the greatest ah-ah.
There are only two acceptable responses to a demand. Conditional concession with counter demand and explanation. Non-concession with explanation