1 / 30

The Watershed Concept

Introduction to Environmental Analysis Environ 239 Instructor: Prof. W. S. Currie GSIs: Nate Bosch, Michelle Tobias Skills Unit 5: Analysis of Coarse-Scale Correlations in Landscapes. The Watershed Concept. Source: HBEF web page 2004. Inputs, outputs, and internal functioning.

ferris
Download Presentation

The Watershed Concept

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Introduction to Environmental AnalysisEnviron 239Instructor: Prof. W. S. Currie GSIs: Nate Bosch, Michelle Tobias Skills Unit 5:Analysis of Coarse-Scale Correlations in Landscapes

  2. The Watershed Concept

  3. Source: HBEF web page 2004

  4. Inputs, outputs, and internal functioning Delineated by the boundary System Inputs Internal functioning Outputs Inputs: “sources” Outputs: “sinks”

  5. Elemental budgets for a unit of landscape: “small watershed ecosystem” • Hubbard Brook Experimental Forest (New Hampshire) • 1960s to present • Goal was to quantify inputs and output fluxes of elements (N, S, Ca, K, Mg) in a forest ecosystem, and compare those to fluxes of same elements cycled internally. • Internal cycling quantified (elements taken up by vegetation each year, cycled back to soil via litterfall)

  6. Source: HBEF web page 2004

  7. Example, “small watershed ecosystem” • Watershed boundaries used for hydrologic convenience: • Inputs quantified easily (elements in deposition falling on area) • Outputs quantified easily (elements in stream flow at that point) • Assumption of nearly watertight bedrock, no losses down into groundwater • Boundary somewhat arbitrary, but an important theoretical tool because it allowed development of this type of environmental analysis • Allowed quantification of inputs, outputs, and comparison against internal cycling, under various conditions & manipulations • Watershed-scale manipulations performed while inputs and outputs quantified (example, forest clear-cutting)

  8. Form groups of two: discuss with neighbor • If you were interested in studying the effects of LULC on water quality, using a watershed approach, how would you design a study to make use of more than one watershed?

  9. Scatterplots in two variables

  10. Fitting a nonlinear regression to a scatterplot

  11. Lab 5: Analysis of landscape factors related to riverine Nitrogen budgets

  12. Large-scale watershed study of N budgets • Variables you will consider in the lab: • Area • Human population • Land use (% agricultural land, % urban) • Mean annual temperature • Mean annual water flow in the river • Total N inputs in watershed (precipitation, fertilizer use, food and feed imports) • Riverine exports of N from each watershed

  13. Nitrogen DepositionPast and Presentmg N m-2 yr-1 5000 2000 1000 750 500 250 100 50 25 5 1993 1860 Galloway and Cowling 2002; Galloway et al. 2002

  14. Units: kg N m-2 y-1 Atmospheric deposition Agricultural runoff Wastewater Walker et al. 1999

  15. “Estimated historical and current nitrogen balances for Illinois” David et al. 2001, The Scientific World 1:597-604 Units: 1000 Mg N / yr

  16. “Estimated historical and current nitrogen balances for Illinois” David et al. 2001, The Scientific World 1:597-604 Units: 1000 Mg N / yr

  17. “Estimated historical and current nitrogen balances for Illinois” David et al. 2001, The Scientific World 1:597-604 Units: 1000 Mg N / yr

  18. Variables that are linked spatially &Correlations among environmental variables

  19. The power of mass balance • The gross fluxes into a system (or pool) minus the gross fluxes out of a system (or pool), over a time interval, must equal the change in stock in the system (or pool). • Works because of the concept of mass balance, and because the units work exactly. • Mass balance is a very powerful tool in ecosystem science and biogeochemistry, and the only math it requires is simple arithmetic and the manipulation of units.

  20. The power of mass balance • One of the reasons this is powerful is because things that are very difficult to measure at large scales can be quantified by difference

  21. Example: Acid rain and the loss of ‘base’ nutrient elements from soil: Ca, K, Mg

  22. The power of mass balance • Example: loss of calcium from a soil over a time period • (calcium is an important component of soil fertility and acid buffering capacity) • If all input-output fluxes are quantified, then change in pool size can be calculated by difference • This change in soil Ca is difficult to measure directly at the watershed scale Deposition inputs Aggradation in growing vegetation Soil Calcium* Inputs from mineral weathering & soil exchange (ionically bound on soil particles) Loss in stream discharge *Pool definition is “soil solution” Boundary = small watershed ecosystem

  23. Variables that are linked spatially • Example from Muehrcke et al. 2001, Chapter 18: • Forest cover vs slope steepness in Iowa county, Wisconsin

More Related