1 / 18

Impedance of SPS travelling wave cavities (200 MHz)

Impedance of SPS travelling wave cavities (200 MHz). A. Grudiev, E. M é tral, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, B. Spataro Acknowledgments: Erk Jensen, Eric Montesinos, Rolf Wegner. Impedance meeting – March 3 rd 2010. This is a work in progress…. Agenda. Context

fraley
Download Presentation

Impedance of SPS travelling wave cavities (200 MHz)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Impedance of SPS travelling wave cavities (200 MHz) A. Grudiev, E. Métral, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova, B. Spataro Acknowledgments: Erk Jensen, Eric Montesinos, Rolf Wegner Impedance meeting – March 3rd 2010

  2. This is a work in progress…

  3. Agenda • Context • EM Simulations to get the transverse wakes • Particle Studio • Try with ABCI • Effect of these transverse wakes on beam dynamics • Future plans

  4. Context: SPS impedance model • A potential way to improve the LHC performance is to increase the intensity in the SPS • Fast vertical instability is one of the limitations to increase the intensity in the SPS  many arguments point towards a Transverse Mode Coupling Instability • Need to identify the sources of transverse impedance in the SPS to be able to find more solutions to increase the threshold of this instability current impedance model (kickers, beam pipe, BPHs, BPVs)explains ~60% of the tune shift with intensity and instability thresholds when used in HEADTAIL beam dynamics simulations. (direct space charge is not included in these simulations). Other potential sources?  RF cavities  septa  pumping ports

  5. Context: SPS 200 MHz TW cavities For HEADTAIL, to lump all these impedances in the same point with x = y =40 m, need to apply a factor 24 to the wake of a single cell • 4 cavities • ACTA: 4*11 cells (x~ 31m, y ~ 76 m) • ACTB: 4*11 cells (x ~84 m, y~27 m) • ACTC: 5*11 cells (x ~25 m, y~91 m) • ACTD: 5*11 cells (x ~85 m, y~27 m) Example: ACTB 18.4 m 4 m

  6. Context: previous studies • Resonant impedances in the SPS (T. Linnecar and E. Shaposhnikova) SL-Note 96-49 RF and G. Dome (CERN-SPS/ARF/77-11)  Longitudinal and transverse parameters of known impedances in the SPS  SW and TW cavities, kickers, septa, pumping ports included Longitudinal From SL-Note 96-49 RF Transverse (dipolar most likely) From SL-Note 96-49 RF

  7. Context: previous studies • Mafia Electromagnetic simulations by Bruno Spataro • Simulations of 9 cells instead of 11 (very large structure) and checked linearity with cells of the low frequency part

  8. Simulations with CST Particle Studio (1) input file of Bruno was translated. (2) Sharp edges were Blended (small impact) (3) the couplers on each side were added (4) cavity was rotated by 90 degrees around z (to be checked with Bruno) (5) bunch length=2 cm rms (~6 million mesh cells)

  9. Transverse wakes (displacement=1 cm) Wy (V/pC) Wx (V/pC) s (cm) s (cm) s (cm) Wdip (V/pC) Wquad (V/pC)

  10. Transverse impedance (displacement=1 cm) Re(Zx) (Ohm) Re(Zy) (Ohm) s (cm) f (GHz) f (GHz) Im(Zx) (Ohm) Im(Zy) (Ohm) f (GHz) f (GHz)

  11. Remarks • Very similar results than Bruno for the vertical dipolar impedance. • Quadrupolar peaks are located at the same frequencies as the longitudinal resonances (200 MHz and 630 MHz)  noise or true signal? • Im(Zx)=Im(Zy)~200  at 1 cm  Im(Ztransdipolar) ~ 0.5 M/m for all the cavities • Source bunch length is large  DFT/iDFT to get wake function is more tricky than for kickers  use of wake potential directly  widens artificially the wake imported into HEADTAIL  need to think of other solutions: 2D codes or GdfidL  first try with ABCI (2D code)

  12. First try with ABCI Rotational symmetry implies that the rods cannot be accounted for

  13. First try with ABCI 200 MHz??? Bunch length=10 cm (rms)

  14. Back to Particle Studio… Same structure as ABCI Original structure from Bruno

  15. Back to Particle Studio… Longitudinal wake Longitudinal impedance Zlong (Ohm) Wz (V/pC) s (cm) s (cm) (1) CST PS and ABCI are giving very similar results (hopefully!!!) (2) Maybe we should stick to 3D simulations in this case…

  16. Effect on beam dynamics • Wakes to be input into Headtail Without cavities With cavities Wx dipolar (V/pCmm) Wy dipolar (V/pCmm) s (m) s (m) s (m) Wx quad (V/pCmm) Wx quad (V/pCmm) s (m) 2 cm rms bunch length is probably too large need to find tricks or change code

  17. Mode spectrum with HEADTAIL accounting for the current model Threshold seen at 1.1 1011 p/b Seems to be between modes -1 and -2 More to be done…

  18. Future plans • Get the low currents to obtain the tune shift • Reduce the bunch length to obtain a better wake over 1 m • Try with GdfidL • Include other RF cavities, septa and pumping ports in the model • Refine existing models (in particular the kickers)

More Related