1 / 12

Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the Citizen A Consultation Paper

Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the Citizen A Consultation Paper. Administrative Law Bar Association 27 July 2008. The essential question.

frederickrodgers
Download Presentation

Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the Citizen A Consultation Paper

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the CitizenA Consultation Paper Administrative Law Bar Association27 July 2008

  2. The essential question How can we create a clear, simple and just system of redress for individuals who have suffered loss as a result of seriously substandard administrative action?

  3. Background • October 2004 – Discussion Paper: Monetary Remedies in Public Law • March 2005 – Ninth Programme of Law Reform • October 2006 – Scoping Paper: Remedies Against Public Bodies • November 2007 – Draft Consultation Paper: Remedies Against Public Bodies, circulated to Government Contact Group • July 2008 – Consultation Paper: Administrative Redress: Public Bodies and the Citizen

  4. Overview of the current landscape • Four pillar of administrative redress: 1. Internal complains mechanisms 2. External mechanisms, such as tribunals 3. Public Sector Ombudsmen 4. Courts

  5. Ombudsman: MP filter Statutory bar Public law: Difficulty in obtaining a monetary remedy Lack of a fit with EC law Private law: Difficulty in satisfying requirements for misfeasance in public office Problems with breach of statutory duty in relation to public bodies Problems in the way the tort of negligence has developed Specific problem with the operation of the rule on joint and several liability in relation to public bodies Weaknesses in the current landscape

  6. Preliminary conclusions on the state of the private law • The law has developed in a complicated manner • This has frequently led to protracted litigation • This serves neither the interests of public bodies or claimants

  7. Some questions • What is “special” about public bodies? • Weaknesses in the Dicean model • Does the law already recognise that public bodies are “special”?

  8. Possible options for reform • Proposed regime built around a requirement for “serious fault” • Public Law • Specific monetary remedy in judicial review • Private Law • Development of special regime for certain types of “truly public” activity • Pure economic loss

  9. Elements of proposed scheme • For private law only – is the activity of the body “truly public”? • Justiciability • “Conferral of benefit” by legal regime • “Serious fault” in the action of the public body – action that falls far below that expected of a public body • Causation • Adjustment to rule on joint and several liability • Immunity – Parliament’s choice

  10. Ombudsman reforms • Special stay in relation to ombudsmen • Power for ombudsmen to make a reference on a point of law to the courts • Reform of the statutory bar • Removal of the MP filter - or possible “dual” system

  11. The Consultation • Consultation Paper published on 3 July 2008 • Consultation period ends on 7 November 2008

  12. Contact details By post: Keith Vincent Public Law Team Law Commission Conquest House 37-38 John Street Theobalds Road London By phone: 020 7453 1293 By email: administrativeredress@lawcommission. gsi.gov.uk Web: http://www.lawcom.gov.uk

More Related