1 / 14

Disaster Risk Reduction for Extreme Geohazards

Disaster Risk Reduction for Extreme Geohazards. Supported by : Geohazards Community of Practice of the Group on Earth Observations (GEO) European Science Foundation Specifically: Seth Stein, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Sean Brocklebank, University of Edinburgh, U.K.

frieda
Download Presentation

Disaster Risk Reduction for Extreme Geohazards

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Disaster Risk Reduction for Extreme Geohazards Supported by: Geohazards Community of Practice of the Group on Earth Observations (GEO) European Science Foundation Specifically: Seth Stein, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, USA Sean Brocklebank, University of Edinburgh, U.K. Stuart Marsh, University of Nottingham, U.K. Paola Campus, European Science Foundation, Strasbourg, France Hans-Peter Plag* and Shelley Jules-Plag** *) Climate Change and Sea Level Rise Initiative, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA **) Tiwah, Inc., Reno, NV, USA 2

  2. Why Extreme Geohazards? The growing, interconnected and increasingly exposed global population faces a mounting risk of a global catastrophe caused by extreme natural hazards. The problem: - extreme hazards occurred in the past, but little exposure often limited the disaster - increased exposure leads to more frequent disasters - complexity of modern societies leads to more indirect effects - sustainability crisis reduces resilience

  3. Why Extreme Geohazards? White Paper on Extreme Geohazards: • What is the problem? • What do we know and not know? • What are we trying to accomplish? • What strategies are available? • What are the costs and benefits of each? • What is the optimal strategy given various assumptions and the uncertainty involved? • What are the societal and governance processes that could facilitate disaster risk reduction?

  4. Terminology Extreme Events: • Extinction Level Events: more than a quarter of all life on Earth is killed and major species extinction takes place. • Global Catastrophes: more than a quarter of the world human population dies and that place civilization in serious risk. • Global Disasters: global-scale events in which a few percent of the population die. • Major Disasters: disasters exceeding $100 Billion in damage and/or causing more than 10,000 fatalities. Modified from Hempsell (2004) X-Event: Rare, surprising, high impact events X-ness X: E: total annual death/gross domestic product delta E: change due to event U: Unfolding time I: Impact time Modified from Casti (2012)

  5. Measuring Impacts

  6. Extreme Hazards The problems: - knowledge of rare events is limited - know better the “why” and “how” but not the “when” - propability is difficult to assess - risk assessment is challenged Poisson distribution; Chance that one or more events occur in a century: We have been very lucky ...

  7. Earthquakes

  8. Volcanic Eruptions

  9. Volcanic Eruptions 1) Krakatau was similar to Santorini eruption, 1600 BC, although 4 times smaller Laki 1783-85: VEI 6, 14 km3 Eyafjallajokull, 2010: VEI 4, 0.25 km3 Several eruptions during the last 2,000 years would have been devastating under todays conditions

  10. Extreme Hazards

  11. Cost-Benefit Analysis Toba, 75,000 years ago, VEI 8, 2,800 km3; killed 60% of human population Impacts: - ash layer, several million square kilometers - destroying one or two seasons of crops for two billion people - reducing global temperature by 5-15 C - substantial physical damage to infrastructure Death comparable to other global disasters: - 1918 Spanish flu: 3% - 5% of global population We assume: - 10% of global population is killed if volcano eruption comes as a surprise

  12. Cost-Benefit Analysis - Value of statistical life (VSL): $9.1 million (U.S. Department of Transportation) - U.S. citizen should be willing to spend $910 to eliminate a 1 in 10,000 risk of fatality - Global VSL: $2.22 million Toba-type eruption: 1 in 100,000 years; fatalities 10%: Probability of a random person dying in any particular year: 1 in 1,000,000. Average person should be willing to pay $2.22 per year to eliminate the risk. Global population over 7 billion: $15 billion per year. Eliminating half of the risk is worth $7.5 billion per year. 2014 USGS Budget: $24.7 million for volcano monitoring Same level globally: $370 million

  13. Conclusion The largest volcano eruptions that occurred during the most recent millennia would today threaten an already stressed food supply and challenge the crucial global transportation network and, without rapid preparation, could easily lead to a global catastrophe. An elaborate volcano observing system needs to be a core element of disaster risk reduction. GHCP is reviewing requirements for this observing system 17

More Related