260 likes | 280 Views
Increasing labour market activity of poor and female: Let’s make work pay in Macedonia. Nikica Mojsoska-Blazevski Marjan Petreski Partner: FREN (Foundation for Advancement of Economics). Outline. A. Background and disincentives to work Motivation for the research Objective
E N D
Increasing labour market activity of poor and female: Let’s make work pay in Macedonia Nikica Mojsoska-Blazevski Marjan Petreski Partner: FREN (Foundation for Advancement of Economics)
Outline A. Background and disincentives to work • Motivation for the research • Objective • Disincentives to work in Macedonia • B. Policy design and simulation results • Policy design • Results and discussion • Conclusion
Research Motivation • Labour market challenges: • High inactivity rate of 36% • Low employment rate, 44% (high gender gap) • One in four workers is employed informally
Table 1 – Activity rates in Macedonia and EU by individual characteristics, in % (2012)
Research Motivation • Unemployment and inactivity are main determinants of poverty • The overall poverty rate is 27.3%, whereas unemployed and inactive persons are more likely to be poor (51% and 35%, respectively) • Social transfers considerably reduce the risk of poverty: the at-risk poverty before social transfers is 43% • However, they do not manage to support the self-sufficiency of the beneficiaries • Less productive workers are kept out of the labour market
Research objective • The potential of MWP policies for reduction of inactivity and social exclusion • Special focus on poor and females
Barriers to employment/activity • Three types of barriers for the disadvantaged individuals (World Bank, 2013): • participation barriers: non-market barriers which prevent workable individuals from supplying their labour • employment barriers: skills and knowledge • benefit disincentives: value of leisure and work • Our study focuses on the third type of barrier
Social protection in Macedonia • Main safety net program in Macedonia is the social financial assistance (SFA), costing 0.3% of GDP • households whose members are able to work but unable to secure themselves materially • App. EUR 90 per month • Means-tested • Unemployment benefits play only a marginal role
Disincentives to work 1. The means-tested nature of the benefit implies that any income that is formally earned reduces the amount of the benefit received • Promotes inactivity and/or informal employment 2. Immediate withdrawal of the benefit once the income exceeds the threshold level (100% marginal effective tax rate)
Disincentives to work (cont.) 3. Some other entitlements stemming from the SFA eligibility • cheap telephone and television packages; financial reimbursement for energy bills; personal computers from the government, etc. 4. Regressive structure of the labour tax reducing the incentive for labour supply at low wage levels
Methodology • Estimating wage equation and imputing wages for those who are not working (Heckman 2-step estimator) • Discrete labor choice: 0, 20 or 40 hrs per week, typical household • MAKMOD: computing household disposable income (9 combinations) • Estimating preferred labor/leisure – consumption combination by means of utility function • Introduction of WTC (in MAKMOD) – back to step 3, 4 and 5
Methodology (2) • MAKMOD • Tax and benefit micro-simulation model for Macedonia based on the EUROMOD (and built upon the guidance of SRMOD team) • Static model: individual behaviour (employment, childcare, saving, etc.) is assumed to be exogenous to the tax-benefit system • Baseline fiscal system: 2011 • Data: Survey of Income and Living Conditions from 2011 (4.000 hh/13.800 individuals) • Labour Supply Model (LSM) • Is fully integrated with the static model • Used to derive the budget sets under the baseline and reformed scenarios • Impose revenue neutrality conditions taking into account the behavioural reactions • MAKMOD + LSM=> Behavioural tax and benefit model
Results- Heckman 2-step equation - • All coefficients have the expected sign; • The inverse Mill’s ratio (lambda) suggests a significant selection bias • i.e. a non-random selection of both males and females into the labour force. • However, unobserved factors that make employment more likely tend to be associated with lower wages for males and higher for females.
Results- Preference estimates – conditional logit - singles-
Results- Preference estimates – conditional logit - singles- • Income insignificant, may be explained by factors like: • underreporting of informal income; • family/household income being more important than individual income, i.e. the case when spending decisions are made by somebody else in the household (World Bank, 2008); and • lack of accessible and affordable childcare for singles with children. • Increasing marginal disutility of hours worked • the marginal disutility of hours worked is larger for females as they likely assign greater value to home-related tasks; • the marginal disutility of hours worked decreases with the level of education for females, given the higher reward of education compared to males
Results- Preference estimates – conditional logit - couples-
Results- Preference estimates – conditional logit - couples- • Marginal utility of income increases with the age of males only • may be related to the increased need for spending in more mature families • Marginal utility declines with hours worked • but the decline is constrained by the level of education, especially of women. • Parenthood gains significance in the case of couples – likely due to the small number of single parents – and it increases the utility of income and reduces disutility of working hours.
Labour supply elasticities • Elasticities for single females are lower than those for single males, but the regularity reverses in couples. • Findings for couples are largely aligned with some imminent characteristics for patriarchal-minded and traditional societies as is Macedonia, whereby the males have the role of house-breeders. • The finding that married males have lower labour supply elasticity than single males may be associated with the larger living costs once family has been established
Labour market choices – reform simulation • Singles - Both reforms would result in a lower non-participation contributing to an increase of employment, the effect being larger under FIWB • Couples - only the IIWB reduces non-participation and increases employment and the effect is smaller than for the case of singles.
Labour market choices for poor and non-poor – reform simulation • An introduction of in-work benefit produces sizeable results for poor singles, while only IIWB for couples • It slightly increases the inactivity of single non-poor, which is likely due to some borderline cases who would opt for non-participation as the benefit fully replaces their income
Labour market choices for male and female – reform simulation • Results suggest that the proposed reforms will have larger impact on females • Comparable magnitudes to those established in the literature (e.g. Figari, 2011, for the Italian case). • The respective changes in the case of males are much smaller in size: 0.7 p.p. and 2.4 p.p.
Conclusions and recommendations • The proposed reform will increase labour market participation in Macedonia • the effect would be particularly strong for poor and females • FIWB would perform better for singles and IIWB for couples • Due to differences in the policy design and in preferences • The recommendation to the MLSP is to consider the introduction of the IWB
Thank you for your attention! nikica@uacs.edu.mk marjan.petreski@uacs.edu.mk