260 likes | 517 Views
STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTATION & MANAGING CHANGE. Prof.dr.dr.dr.h.c. Constantin Bratianu Faculty of Business Administration Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest. PLANNED CHANGE. The basic idea of this theory is that change can be planned and managed as a controlled process.
E N D
STRATEGIES IMPLEMENTATION & MANAGING CHANGE Prof.dr.dr.dr.h.c. Constantin Bratianu Faculty of Business Administration Academy of Economic Studies Bucharest
PLANNED CHANGE • The basic idea of this theory is that change can be planned and managed as a controlled process. • Since change has been considered at the organization level, all research focused on Organizational Development (OD). • Kurt Lewin founded in 1945 the Research Centerfor Group Dynamics, with a huge influence.
MODELS OF PLANNED CHANGE • The action research model • The three-steps model • The phases of planned change model
THE ACTION RESEARCH MODEL • Action Research has been designed to solve social and organizational problems. • It is research on action to make that action more effective. Action refers to programs and interventions designed to solve a problem or improve a condition. • The main idea is that effective solving of organizational problems must involve a rational, and systematic analysis of the issues in question.
THE ACTION RESEARCH (I) • The Action research comprises 3 components: - the organization (top management) - the subject (people where change is done) - the change agent • The 3 entities must agree to form a group, under mutually acceptable and constructed terms of reference.
THE ACTION RESEARCH (II) • The main difficulty is to gain the commitment of both the organization and the subject of the change. • The strategy was to use top-down change implementation based on top managers authority. • This approach is not working well in large organizations and where the distance to power is relatively small.
THE 3-STEP MODEL • The basic idea was that change toward a higher level of group performance is frequently short lived. After some time, group behaviour may revert to the previous pattern. • This indicates that it is not enough to define change as a target and to stop. It is important to include also the group performance in the new state of change.
Kurt Lewin’s Change Model Proposed by K. Lewin (1958) for implementing change in an organization through 3 stages: Change Re-freezing Organizational culture Unfreezing Organizational culture
PHASES OF PLANNED CHANGE • The concept of planned change implies that an organization exists in different states at different times and that planned movement can occur from one state to another. • For planned change it is important to understand not only the change but also the states through which the organization must pass.
THE 4-PHASE MODEL • Bullock and Batten (1985) developed an integrated four-phase model for planned change: 1.Exploration phase 2.Planning phase 3.Action phase 4.Integration phase
EXPLORATION PHASE • Becoming aware of the need for change • Searching for outside assistance (a consultant/ facilitator) to assist with planning and implementing the change • Establishing a contract with the consultant which defines each party’s responsibility
PLANNING PHASE • Analysis and diagnosis of the problem to be solved • Establishing change goals and designing the appropriate actions to achieve these goals • Establishing priorities and sequence requirements for change implementation • Allocation of tangible and intangible resources for each change sequence
ACTION PHASE • Identify all possible resistances to change and their nature • Evaluate the inertial forces of each resistance • Choose adequate approaches to overcome each resistance • Evaluate the progress of change implementation • Perform corrections to the initial plan if necessary
INTEGRATION PHASE • This phase begins when the changes have been successfully implemented • It is concerned with consolidating and stabilising the changes • Reinforcing the new behaviours through feedback and reward systems • Diffusing the successful aspects of the change process through the organization • Train managers and employees to monitor the changes and seek to improve upon them
LIMITATIONS (I) • The basic hypothesis that an organization exists in different states at different times and that planned change is a transition from one state to another • The dynamics of business environment imposes organizational change to be more a continuous and open-ended process, than a set of discrete and self-contained events
LIMITATIONS (II) • Its emphasis on incremental change and its inability to incorporate radical, transformational change • It assumes that one type of approach to change is suitable for all organizations, all situations and all times • Turbulent times demand different responses in varied circumstance
THE EMERGENT CHANGE APPROACH • It is a new approach which lacks agreed methods and techniques • This approach stresses the developing and unpredictable nature of change • Change is viewed as a process that unfolds through the interplay of multiple variables within the organization • There is no single prescription for managing organizational transitions successfully
BOTTOM-UP APPROACH • Planned change is implemented more likely through a top-down approach • Emergent change is implemented more likely through a bottom-up approach • The bottom-up approach requires a major change in the role played by senior managers. Instead of planning, directing and controlling change they must create adequate conditions for supporting change
IMPORTANT FEATURES • Though the concept of universally applicable rules for change are rejected, supporters of emergent change stress 4 necessary organizational features: - organizational structure - organizational culture - organizational learning - managerial behaviour
ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE • This is seen as playing a crucial role in defining how people relate to each other and in influencing the momentum for change • The more flexible and flatter organizational structure to increase the responsiveness to change, by developing authority of all managers and responsibility • Organizational structure based on teams and networks
ORGANIZATIONAL CULTURE • If change is developing in concordance with the cultural values, organizational culture will support the change • If change is developing against the cultural values, organizational culture must be changed along with change implementation • Creating a culture for change means that change has to be part of the way we do things around here
ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING • Change is an excellent opportunity to learn new things and then to adapt the organization to the new external business environment requirements • Organizational learning is based on the double loop model (single loop model = solving problems in a programmed way) • Organizational learning creates a pro-active approach to change
MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOUR(I) • The role of managers is not to plan and to control, but to create an internal environment able to accept and to support change • The key organizational elements are: - Information gathering - Communication - Learning
MANAGERIAL BEHAVIOUR (II) • For supporters of the emergent approach, the essence of change is to move from the known to the unknown • In this situation, it is essential for managers to be able to tolerate risk and cope with ambiguity • Managers must develop the skills of making decisions in situations with high levels of uncertainty
ENVIRONMENT Stable Turbulent Planned Emergent APPROACHES TO CHANGE