1 / 17

ETHOS

ETHOS. 2011 application. Project description. 2 areas are focused on: area 1: meeting the needs of highly talented pupils by offering opportunities to participate in models of good practice to staff and students across the partnership

gemma-lyons
Download Presentation

ETHOS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ETHOS 2011 application

  2. Project description 2 areas are focused on: • area 1: meeting the needs of highly talented pupils by offering opportunities to participate in models of good practice to staff and students across the partnership • area 2: exploring and sharing good practices in meeting the special needs of pupils

  3. Area 1 subjects • mathematics (cf. IRISS evaluation sheets & disappointing participation in high level maths studies) • sports (health, lifestyle, competition, etc.) • music (specialized & strong area in several of our schools) • leadership / entrepreneurship

  4. Area 2 Exploring and sharing good practice in meeting the special needs of pupils with: • reading/writing difficulties (incl. dyslexia, second language difficulties, etc.) • difficulties with number • behavioural difficulties (incl. motivational problems, ADHD, etc.)

  5. Obj 1: European citizenship • To foster cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue • To enhance the curriculum experience of students and raise their levels of achievement • To improve the quality of teaching and learning across the network • To identify and share best practice • To develop and implement innovative practice • To organise study visits (teachers) and master classes (students)

  6. Obj 2: Equal opportunities • to attain more learning profit for more pupils, especially those with special talents and special needs • create a context of accepted integration in all schools across the network • prevent pupils from dropping out of education early

  7. Obj 3: Communication & research skills • improve communication skills for pupils using high quality standards to assess (CEF; cf running Comenius project IRISS) • train teachers and pupils in IT-skills • train teachers and pupils in research skills (making questionnaires, collecting and analysing data)

  8. Obj 4: Q-assurance • to further develop self-evaluation tools and monitor the progress of the activities • to further take care of the professional management of the network • take care of the dissemination of the results to all stakeholders and external partners

  9. Programme & timing • Kick-off conference Oct 2011: • Agreement on evaluation tools to be used during the project: research methodology and questionnaires for special needs teams, and evaluation formats for the miniconferences/master classes • Creation of programme and time schedule for master classes/miniconferences

  10. Activities • mini-conferences and master classes on area 1 topics: 2011-2013 • research on special needs: reports by April 2012 • mini-conferences on reading, writing, number difficulties and behavioural difficulties: 2012-2013 • Closing Conference May 2013: final project report which describes the reflections of schools on what they have experienced and learned

  11. Q-monitoring • Creating, revising and distributing questionnaires, diaries and other evaluation tools to the participating schools • monitoring the use of these by the schools • collecting and analyzing the results of the evaluations • reporting, presenting and disseminating the results of the evaluations • making recommendations to the steering committee and the schools of the network on possible improvements

  12. Conferences • Ireland: Oct 2011 12-16th • Finland: May 2012 9-13th • Slovakia: Oct 2012 3-7th • France: May 2013 8-12th

  13. Dissemination • evaluation of all activities • feedback during the conferences to the member schools • publication on the website of the project • local feedback: school websites, magazines, local press, …

  14. Master classes • Maths: in Sweden spring 2012 • BagsværdKostskoleog Gymnasium, Danderyds Gymnasium, EscolaSecundária Francisco Rodrigues Lobo, Gymnáziumbilingválne, HeiligeMaagdcollege, Liceo Alessandro daImola, Lycée Michel-Rodange, MóriczZsigmondGimnázium, Radyr Comprehensive School • Music: in Germany spring 2013 • Wittekind Gymnasium, JõgevaGümnaasium, Radyr Comprehensive School

  15. Mini-conferences • Special needs: in Belgium Nov 2012 • Bagsværd, Bundesrealgymn., Cygnaeus-lukio, Danderyds, Rodrigues Lobo, Gymn. bilingválne, H Maagdcollege, St-Jude, Mig. Catalán, Jõgeva, Lena, A daImola, Hub. Clément, M.-Rodange, MóriczZsigmond, Radyr, Ramsgrange, Kalamaria. Strabrecht, Wittekind • Sports: in Austria spring 2013 • BagsværdKostskoleog Gymnasium, Bundesrealgymnasium Wien 19, Esc. Sec. Fr. Rodrigues Lobo, Inst. Saint-Jude, JõgevaGümnaasium, Lena videregåendeskole, Liceo Alessandro daImola, Ramsgrange Comm. School, Second Lyc. of Kalamaria, Strabrecht College

  16. Other activities • Application: p. 100 – 105 • many bilateral exchanges • Conclusion: • few master classes / mini-conferences • nothing on leadership

  17. Planning • June 2011: Finnish agency will decide • approval in Finland = approval for all schools (in principle) • kick-off = Ireland Oct 2011 (prepared by Q’s & SC Sept 18-19th in Dendermonde)

More Related