1 / 9

CAREM WP 3 : Quality and Evaluation Plan WP Leader: Universal Learning Systems

CAREM WP 3 : Quality and Evaluation Plan WP Leader: Universal Learning Systems Timeframe: 2012 – 2014 Third Project meeting Herford, Germany 6 – 7 March 2014. WP 3 : Quality and Evaluation Plan D eliverables (2): 5. Interim Assessment 30.09.13 6. Final Assessment 30.09.14.

gina
Download Presentation

CAREM WP 3 : Quality and Evaluation Plan WP Leader: Universal Learning Systems

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CAREM WP3: Quality and Evaluation Plan WP Leader: Universal Learning Systems Timeframe: 2012 – 2014 Third Project meeting Herford, Germany 6 – 7 March 2014

  2. WP3: Quality and Evaluation Plan Deliverables (2): 5. Interim Assessment 30.09.13 6. Final Assessment 30.09.14

  3. WP3: Quality and evaluation Plan: reminder • The following Evaluation criteria were defined for consideration throughout the project: • Project management (control management efficiency, verification of intermediate and final results against the initial objectives and scheduling) • Organizational effectiveness of the project partnership • Effectiveness of the information exchange • Content quality of the services provided by the project • Economic Efficiency of the activities carried out in terms of human and financial resources • - Potential for dissemination and sustainability of project activities and results.

  4. Adapted Critical path method as a base for deeper evaluation/QA fields WP 1 Project management WP 2 WP 4 WP 5 WP 6 WP 6 Dissemination & Exploitation URL Conferences Development Of Educational Materials Objectives Activity pools CAREM Booklet Teacher Guide Translations & Localization Of Materials Translations & Localization Of Materials Teacher Training Pilot Revision Implementation WP 3Quality and evaluation plan

  5. Key points • Interim EACEA evaluation • Schedule: variations • Deadlines: were these respected? • Contact and Communication: identified issues • Transparency: variable • Focus: consistency and sustainability questioned • Developing – and recording – debate: inadequate • Problem identification: critical , plus feedback • Deliverables as markers: charting the journey….

  6. Methodology • Formative • Summative • Quality • Surveys • Questionnaires • Role of External Evaluator

  7. Quality Plan indicators • Transnational partner project meetings • Impact of actions (what was done, targets) • Process (how was it done, methods) • Modifications required • Dissemination measures – from aspirations to actions • Project management linkage • Internal rapport and communication

  8. Concerns • Critical to identify and agree blockages and correct deviations • Investigate reasons for slippage or underperformance • Feedback loop with immediate corrective actions • Impact of external audit • Communications require significant improvement • Need to engage external stakeholders and think outside the box • Innovation and bypassing blockages • Ownership and consistency from all partners

  9. Next steps • Immediate improvement in quality of actions and methods • Coordination • Communication • Dissemination evidence and quality • Understanding impact of actions • Time pressures • Exploitation – the final frontier • Tough decisions and actions required urgently

More Related