1 / 24

Theory of Situational and Approaches to Conflict Resolution

Theory of Situational and Approaches to Conflict Resolution. Sandra Olga / 51408095 Felicia N/ 51410033. Situational Theory. Why we need this theory?

gustav
Download Presentation

Theory of Situational and Approaches to Conflict Resolution

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Theory of Situational and Approaches to ConflictResolution Sandra Olga / 51408095 Felicia N/ 51410033

  2. SituationalTheory Why we need this theory? • To summarizes the prevailing situation as it affects the company relative to its position in the market and to its various constituent groups. • It notes positive attributes of the subject, as well as the negatives and challenges that contribute to the need for Public Relations

  3. Theory of Situational

  4. SituationalTheory • It’s important to know what the stakeholder thinks of the company or organization- alone and relative to competition or alternative entities. • Stakeholders as a way of describing relationships.

  5. SituationalTheory • Public relations people could more effectively managecommunications by identifying specific publics. • These publics were subgroups that were more or less active in their communication behavior.

  6. SituationalTheory • Example: PR for a politician Focus their communication efforts on those voters who can be counted on to go to polls on election day. Politician analysis what their public’s need. • Grunig and Hunt: A situational theory of publics to give us more specific information about public’s communication needs.

  7. SituationalTheory • There is a range: from those who actively seek and process information about an organization or an issue of interest, to those publics who passively receive information.

  8. SituationalTheory Three variables predict when publics will seek and process information about an issue: problem recognition, constraint recognition, and level of involvement.

  9. SituationalTheory • Problem Recognition Publics facing an issue must first be aware of it and recognize its potential to affect them. Example:Bussinesman at trading company will be more aware of candidate for the next trade minister.

  10. SituationalTheory • Constraint Recognition This variable describes how publics perceive obstacles that may stand in the way of a solution. If they believe they have a real shot at influencing an issue, they will tend to seek and process information on that issue.

  11. SituationalTheory Example: The parents of the children at primary school. They have more access to school decision makers because they have more contact with school principals, teachers, and administrators.

  12. SituationalTheory • Level of Involvement This variable refers to how much an individual cares about an issue. Those who care a lot would likely be active communicators on an issue. Those who care little would likely be more passive in seeking and processing information.

  13. SituationalTheory • Situational theory also helps explain why some groups are active on a single issue, others are active on many issues, and others are uniformly apathetic. • The specific relationship is determined by the type of group (active, passive) and how an organization is linked with the issue.

  14. SituationalTheory • Public relations can plan their communication strategies much more accurately if they know how actively their stakeholder publics will seek information from the organization.

  15. SituationalTheory • Situational theory keeps us focused on the kinds of information that publics want rather than the organization’s choice of information to distribute. It also assumes that publics will pay attention and seek out information that is in their best interests.

  16. Approaches to ConflictResolution

  17. Approaches to ConflictResolution • Menurut Plowman, Briggs, dan Huang, terdapat 9 macamresolusikonflikberkaitandenganorganisasidanpublik: 1. Pertengkaran 2. Kerjasama 3. Akomodasi 4. Penghindaran 5. Konstruktiftanpasyarat 6. Kompromi 7. Berprinsip 8. Menang – menangatautidaksamasekali 9. Mediasi

  18. Approaches to ConflictResolution Pertengkaran Satupihak yang memaksakanposisinyapadapihak lain. Contoh: Karyawanmempunyaimasalahdengandirektur. Yang akhirnyadirekturdenganposisinyamemecatkaryawantersebut. Kerjasama • Keduabelahpihakbekerjasamadalammencarijalankeluar yang salingmenguntungkan. • Contoh: Win-win solution. Pr Ancoltentangkasusrusaknyawahana.

  19. Approaches to ConflictResolution Akomodasi Satupihaksecarasepihakmenyerahdanmenurunkanaspirasinya. Contoh: Pr inginmembuat event CSR, tapijikapemegangsahamtidaksetuju. Maka Pr harusmengalah. Penghindaran • Satuatauduapihakmenghindarikonflik, baiksecarafisikmaupunpsikologi. • Contoh: Pihak Freeport tidakmengklarifikasidanterbukadengan media, atasapa yang terjadidanmenghindarikonflikberkelanjutan.

  20. Approaches to ConflictResolution Konstruktiftanpasyarat Organisasimerekonsiliasikepentinganstrategiorganisasidengankepentinganpubliknya, tanpamensyaratkanapakahpublikakanmengikutiarahanatautidak, bahkanwalaupunpihak lain dalamkonflikitutidakmemberibalasanapapun. Contoh: Microsoft menawarkanpembelianperusahaankepadaperusahaankecil yang sedangkesulitan, tapimenjadidibawahperusahaannya.

  21. Approaches to ConflictResolution Kompromi Kesepakatanalternatif yang berdirisedikitdiantaraposisi yang diinginkanpihak lain. Contoh: Pt Lapindomembuatkesepakatandengankorban, yaitumembayaruangkompensasi. Berprinsip Keduabelahpihakberpegangpadasatuprinsip yang tidakbisadikompromikan. Contoh: Angelina Sondakhberpendapatbahwadirinyatidakmengetahuikasuskorupsi. Media berpendapatdirinyaikutandil.

  22. Approaches to ConflictResolution Mediasi Melibatkanpihakluar yang tidakmemilikikepentingan. Contoh : KOMNAS perlindungananakberperansebagai mediator dalammenyelesaikanmasalah yang terjadi.

  23. Approaches to ConflictResolution Menang – menangatautidaksamasekali • Keduabelahpihaksepakatuntuktidakmembuatpersetujuanapa pun sampaimerekasiapuntukmembuatkeputusan. • Contoh: Indonesia-Malaysia mengklaimpulauSipadandanLigitan. Keduapulaumasihberstatus quo, tanpamembuatpersetujuanapa pun.

  24. Reference: • Marconi, Joe. 2004. Public Relations: The complete guide.USA: Thomson Learning • http://highered.mcgraw-hill.com/sites/dl/free/0073512052/930653/Chapter_3.pdf • http://komunikasi-indonesia.org/tag/teori-komunikasi/page/2/

More Related