1 / 17

Regional Attitudes towards Climate Change

2C3D Group. Regional Attitudes towards Climate Change. Participants:. 2 Cautious 1Dismissive 1Doubtful 1Disengaged. gCore Fall 2011 Ashley McBee, Matthew Elswick, Stephanie Huck, Melissa Peterson, Aaron Zimmer.

gwylan
Download Presentation

Regional Attitudes towards Climate Change

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 2C3D Group Regional Attitudes towards Climate Change Participants: 2 Cautious 1Dismissive 1Doubtful 1Disengaged gCore Fall 2011 Ashley McBee, Matthew Elswick, Stephanie Huck, Melissa Peterson, Aaron Zimmer

  2. Our breakout group was comprised of 2 participants from the Cautious category, and 1 each from the Disengaged, Doubtful, and Dismissive categories. It is interesting to note: of the 42 interviews our class conducted, the last three Six Americas categories were represented by only one person each. This means that among the Olympians our class interviewed: only 2.3% of respondents were disengaged, doubtful and dismissive, compared to 12%, 11%, and 7%, respectively, from the national survey.

  3. Because of the disparate nature of our group, synthesis of the information was a little more difficult. Our matrices might look different than other groups who had a more homogenous grouping of opinion and attitude.

  4. From the Six America's Study : The Cautious believe that global warming is a problem, although they are less certain that it is happening than the Alarmed or the Concerned; they don’t view it as a personal threat, and don’t feel a sense of urgency to deal with it.

  5. From the Six America's Study : The Disengaged haven’t thought much about the issue at all, don’t know much about it, and are the most likely to say that they could easily change their minds about global warming.

  6. From the Six America's Study : The Doubtful are evenly split among those who think global warming is happening, those who think it isn’t, and those who don’t know. Many within this group believe that if global warming is happening, it is caused by natural changes in the environment, believe global warming won’t harm people for many decades into the future, if at all, and say that America is already doing enough to respond to the threat.

  7. From the Six America's Study : The Dismissive, like the Alarmed, are actively engaged in the issue, but on the opposite end of the spectrum; the majority believe that warming is not happening, is not a threat to either people or non-human nature, and strongly believe it is not a problem that warrants a national response.

  8. Our Study: Interviewers Cautious (interviewed by SH & MP) Disengaged (interviewed by Matthew) Doubtful (interviewed by Ashley) Dismissive (interviewed by Aaron)

  9. 1) Distrust or Disconnection from Media 2) Uncertainty regarding efficacy of governmental public policy 3) Majority feeling of disbelief in anthropogenic climate change 4) Polarized views about Climate Change 5) Majority feeling of not having enough information Keywords and Themes Media Policy Lay People vs Experts Polar Bears Weather

  10. MatricesKeywords Keywords Cautious (SH, MP) Disengaged (ME) Doubtful (AM) Dismissive (AZ) Media Not credible Not interested Misinformed Controlling, Profiteering Policy Conditionally Supportive/Skeptical Conditionally Supportive Supportive Success in US, Failure in World Lay People Panicked/Uneducated Generational Lack of Knowledge Manipulated Experts Trusted/Scientists Universities Knowledgeable Controlling Polar Bears X/Unconcerned Concerned X X Weather Unusual/Unchanged Windier No Noticeable Changes Worse

  11. Cautious (SP, MP) Disengaged (ME) Doubtful (AM) Dismissive (AZ) Matrices (2)Sources of Information Information Sources Not Trusted Trusted Not Trusted Trusted Not Trusted Trusted Not Trusted Trusted TV (General) 3 X X 4 2 X 3 X Newspaper 8 X X X 1 X 2 1 Scientific Research X 12 X X 1 2 3 X Internet 1 X X X 3 X 1 X Tally 12 12 0 4 7 2 9 1

  12. MatricesSource of Information Tallies Information Sources Not Trusted Trusted TV (General) 8 4 Newspaper 11 1 Scientific Research 4 14 Internet 5 0 Tally 28 19

  13. Cautious participants were either uninterested in the human element and policy to alter climate change or believed anthropogenic climate change was fabricated by money-hungry media sources. • Disengaged participant mentioned they had not seen or heard media coverage on climate change. • Dismissive participant believed that the United States had already curbed any of its possible contribution to climate change. • Doubtful “anti-government” participant would support public policy based on valid climate change research. Surprising Outcomes

  14. Conclusions and Future Work Applicable future work might include qualitative research aimed at getting a better understanding of our participant groups’ understanding and points of view; WHY they believe what they believe. It would be valuable to know what kind of information angle it would take for them to believe in or act based on Climate Change. Also, research their information base, such as the book: Unstoppable Global Warming: Every 1500 Years Singer, S.F., Avery, D.T., 2007. Rowan and Littlefield Publishers

  15. 2C3D Group Thank you.

More Related