290 likes | 528 Views
Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process. Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July 29, 2011. Monitoring the Vision: Casey’s Dashboard . Goal : Every child deserves a safe, permanent home
E N D
Indicating Success in Public Child Welfare Child Outcomes, System Performance and the CFSR Process Susan Smith and Lisa Tuttle Casey Family Programs July 29, 2011
Monitoring the Vision:Casey’s Dashboard • Goal: Every child deserves a safe, permanent home • Vision: Reduce the children in the United States in foster care in half by the year 2020 • In 2005 there were ½ million children; moving to ¼ million by 2020 • Monitor:Key performance indicators at a national level • Evaluate:Work and efforts at the state and county level
Long term trends in entries & exits Data notes: For years before 2000, data are averaged across a two-year period. Data for 1995 and before should not be compared to data from 1996 and beyond. Data on entries and exits not available for 1995-1997. Data from 1982-1989 retrieved from the American Public Welfare Association/Voluntary Cooperative Information System (VCIS). Data from 1990-1994 based on the VCIS and retrieved from the Children’s Bureau website. Data from 1995-1998 retrieved from CWLA/NDAS. Data from 1999-20010 based on AFCARS.
Trends In Out-of-Home Care: Slides prepared by Data Advocacy, 7/25/11 Data source: AFCARS
National Entry Rates, FY09 - improved overall entry rate Slides prepared by Data Advocacy, 7/25/11 Data source: AFCARS
U.S. Foster Care Systemhighly simplified a bunch of stuff happens CHILD IN CHILD OUT But is the child safe? (Whether in foster care or at home) And what is the child’s level of well-being? *adapted from Lyle, G. L., & Barker, M.A. (1998) Patterns & Spells: New approaches to conceptualizing children’s out of home placement experiences. Chicago: American Evaluation Association Annual Conference
BackgroundChild and Family Services Reviews (CFSR) • Goal: Improve the performance of state child welfare systems • Timeline: 1994 Federal government mandate to review and evaluate state foster care and adoption services • Children’s Bureau of the Administration on Children and Families (ACF) administers the process • Purpose of CFSRs: To ensure states are in “substantial conformity” with Titles IV-B and IV-E Federal Funding, within the domains of safety, permanence, and well-being.
Outcome Measures:What we have What we need valid reliable comprehensible = a good measure
Outcome Measures Data should be gathered and analyzed in a manner that facilitates understanding of how one area of practice affects another Acknowledgement to Emily Putnam-Hornstein and Barbara Needell, University of California, Berkeley, for the slide content.
Proposed Measuresprocess measures - required Worker-Child Visits Timeliness of Investigations
Outcome Measures…. family preservation Measures of primary and secondary prevention services?
Data-sharing / Interoperability • Longer-term vision
Conclusions • Child welfare needs to be considered an integrated system of child safety and well-being, not a foster care program • The Federal role is to assure accountability and compliance, which includes child safety • Innovations in states and agencies lead the way in integrating and translating data into information about what works