220 likes | 411 Views
The Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland. Induction Seminar 22 nd November 2007. Mentoring. Mentoring – what it is NOT. Not about babysitting, or looking after the ‘new kids on the block’ Not about monitoring performance Not about learning the legal ropes
E N D
The Judicial Studies Board for Northern Ireland Induction Seminar 22nd November 2007
Mentoring – what it is NOT • Not about babysitting, or looking after the ‘new kids on the block’ • Not about monitoring performance • Not about learning the legal ropes • Not a luxury there isn’t time for • Not about criticising decisions • Not a cosy chat
What is mentoring? Mentoring is the process whereby an experienced member of an organisation acts as a confidential adviser to one or more recently appointed members in order to help them understand the workings of the organisation and their role within it. A mentor provides support, advice and guidance, and gives the new appointee someone experienced and independent with whom to discuss difficult issues. Mentoring is an opportunity.
Benefits For the mentee – • Provides practical and professional support in becoming familiar with and managing the judicial role • Helps to develop an overview of his/her own role and gives confidence in a way that supplements training • Helps to develop an understanding of procedures and systems within the court system • Encourages reflection on practice • Identifies areas of development • Enhances self confidence and self-esteem • Provides a sense of being supported (and reduces any sense of isolation or stress) • Provides a role model and a sounding board • Offers personal support
Benefits For the mentor: • Improves role satisfaction • Helps develop specific skills • Encourages self reflection • Leads to developments in the mentor’s own practice • Helps to develop relationships • Enhances peer recognition • Assists career development
Benefits For the justice system: • Enhances the induction process and assists the integration of the mentee into the justice system • Enhances communication • Motivates individuals • Enables the new appointee to enhance the quality of the justice system • The service provided to the court user is improved
Mentoring tasks • Negotiating and agreeing • Identifying learning needs • Observing • Recording • Giving feedback • Reviewing • Problem-solving • Giving information and advice • Target setting • Clarifying strategies and actions
The mentor’s skills • Showing respect • Showing empathy and understanding • Active listening • Questioning • Exploring and clarifying • Reflecting • Challenging stereotypes, discriminating or inappropriate remarks • Summarising • Observing • Giving and receiving feedback • Action planning • Decision making • Self reflection • Non judgmental
The mentee’s skills • Self-reflection • Self-assessment • Active listening • Questioning • Reviewing • Observing • Giving and receiving feedback • Being assertive • Decision making • Clarifying values and beliefs
Duration • Starts now! • Court observations before early December • Initial meeting within next 2-3 months • Mentor should make himself/herself available to respond to queries during mentee’s first year • May be of benefit to the mentee to maintain the relationship informally over succeeding years
Observations • Recommend at least 3 observations before sitting in court (early/mid December) • Preferably 2 to be with mentor • Judicial Services Group (JSG) will arrange • If helpful, mentor may observe mentee once sittings commence
Meetings • Mentor should contact mentee as soon as possible after this seminar to arrange initial meeting, to take place before or after the first sitting as a deputy • At the initial meeting, parties should clarify understanding of the purposes of mentoring and agree what they hope to achieve through the experience • Agree a basic framework – what way might the mentor support the mentee, frequency of meetings, opportunities for review • Suggest 2 review meetings during the year • Additional meetings at the request of the mentee • The mentor takes responsibility for monitoring the process and ensuring contact is appropriately managed • Ensure the mentee is familiar with or has access to various Bench Books and guidelines so that the mentee is well prepared to deal with a range of issues • Don’t forget the phone and email!
It’s probably a silly question…I’ll look stupid • No it’s not and no you won’t • Your mentor is the person of whom you can ask the ‘silly’ question • Volume of work, personalities in court, court staff, personal litigants, difficult decisions and situations, who to speak to about…, where to find…, how do I get a cup of tea, what to wear. • “It can be a lonely job – it’s good to talk”
Suggestions for good practice • Use active listening skills - good eye contact, summarising and paraphrasing • Ask open questions • Allow mentee to do most of the talking • Encourage confidence and responsibility • Use constructive and supportive language • If problems occur, mentor to ask mentee to explain what happened, reflect back and ask themselves what other course of action they would have taken • Encourage mentees to think for themselves • Be non judgmental at all times
Looking ahead • Mentors to stress that they are available as a sounding board and for informal advice but not to make arrangements for the mentee – the aim of mentoring is to empower the mentee to develop and think for themselves • Mentees should be encouraged to take sole responsibility for decision making but the mentor may give objective support and advice • Judicial independence
The good… Mentor support can be powerfully positive and enabling, developing a greater sense of confidence and enhancing the personal and professional skills of both mentor and mentee alike.
…the bad… A less effective mentoring relationship can be inhibiting, encouraging dependency and reducing self-confidence and a sense of autonomy on the part of the mentee.