1 / 29

Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events

Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events. Kathryn McWilliams and Matt Wessel University of Saskatchewan. FTE Models. From Scholer, 1995. FTEs at the Magnetopause. bipolar field variation. (Russell & Elphic, 1979). Flux Transfer Events at the Magnetopause.

harper
Download Presentation

Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Hemispheric Comparison of Signatures of Flux Transfer Events Kathryn McWilliams and Matt WesselUniversity of Saskatchewan Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  2. FTE Models From Scholer, 1995 Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  3. FTEs at the Magnetopause bipolar field variation (Russell & Elphic, 1979)

  4. Flux Transfer Events at the Magnetopause (Neudegg et al., 2001) bipolar boundary-normal FTE signatures Magnetopause (Equator-S) Ionosphere (SuperDARN) poleward moving radar auroral forms (PMRAFs) Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  5. Poleward Moving Radar Patches (STARE) • poleward moving patches during Aug 28, 1978, storm • patches emanate from polar cap boundary (Sofko et al., 1979; 1985) Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  6. STARE Patches & GEOS-2 M’pause Crossings upwelling ions GEOS-2 footprint in patch GEOS-2 footprint poleward of patch 10X fewer upwelling ions (Sofko et al., 1979; 1985) Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  7. Pulsed Ionospheric Flows (PIFs) vs. PMRAFs discrete poleward moving patches (with data gaps) PMRAFs PIFs oscillating flow magnitude (with continuous data) Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  8. MHD Simulation – No Dipole Tilt • Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006 • “Stagnation line” – separates northward and southward flow • Relatively smooth flow away from subsolar point (Earth-Sun line) • No evident plasmoids • Reconnection relatively smooth Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  9. MHD Simulation – Large Dipole Tilt • Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006 • “Stagnation line” located off Earth-Sun line, towards winter hemisphere • Reconnection X-line forms winter-ward of Sun-Earth line • Plasmoid forms in region of flow towards winter cusp • Field lines draped around plasmoid from summer cusp form second X-line • Plasmoid moves towards winter cusp • No plasmoid observed in summer hemisphere Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  10. 3D Simulations – Development Along Magnetopause • Raeder, Annales Geophysicae, 2006 Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  11. 2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection • Patch of SuperDARN backscatter: • footprint of reconnected field lines • measured by two overlapping SuperDARN radars (CUTLASS) • Compared patch motion to ExB drift (McWilliams et al., 2001) Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  12. 2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection • patch expands and moves azimuthally • convection speed differs from patch motion at first Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  13. 2-D Electric Field in Footprint of Reconnection • Two phases of motion: (1) reconnection (2) convection • FTEs are not necessarily “small” 1 2 Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  14. Recent Observations • Korotova & Sibeck, GRL, 2008 • Considered m’pause crossings • Interball-1 on dayside only during northern summer months; north=summer, south=winter • Included only FTEs during neg. IMF Bz • Bz < -1 nT • Interball-1 FTEs observed exclusively in WINTER hemisphere Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  15. Signatures of FTEs McWilliams et al., AG, 2004 Geotail FTEs SuperDARN poleward moving forms 18 Jan 1999 (NH winter) 4 hours UT Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  16. Survey of Poleward Moving Radar Auroral Forms • only examined poleward moving forms (PMRAFs) • no modulated continuous drifts (PIFs) • Radar Frequency is important! • Before 2002 used single day and single night transmitter frequency • Con: You have to be lucky to get good propagation • Pro: Motion of patches is geophysical frequency change Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  17. Survey of SuperDARN PMRAFs • Noted days when PMRAFs evident (visual inspection) • viewing angle important Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  18. Comparing N&S Hem. • The “one hope” frequency makes things difficult • Not guaranteed that radio wave will refract enough to scatter back from cusp/mantle patches Kerguelen = SH Ker Han Hankasalmi = NH Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  19. Question Answered! • …sort of • Simultaneous poleward moving form in winter and summer hemisphere • This is RARE Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  20. Seasonal Dependence? • Hankasalmi data only • Does not run “sounding” mode, so patch motion is geophysical • Visual inspection of PMRAFs over nearly a full solar cycle • 1997 – 2006 • FTE: 1893 days • No FTE: 3468 days (~35% FTE) Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  21. Probably Not… • Our day-frequency is not optimized for season • So we take what we can get • The number of days with FTEs strongly resembles the amount of ionospheric backscatter overall throughout the year • No seasonal trend in SuperDARN PMRAFs Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  22. Summary and Future Work • Study motivated by simulations and observations of FTEs in winter hemisphere • Modelled plasmoids form in on winter side of Sun-Earth line • Modelled plasmoids carried through winter cusp • FTEs detected in winter hemisphere by Interball-1 • Reconnection footprint should map to both hemispheres, so particles are expected to precipitate into both hemispheres, regardless of where plasmoid forms • SuperDARN does not see seasonal dependence on occurrence of PMRAFs • Simultaneous observations by Hankasalmi and Kerguelen • More sophisticated analysis of statistics is required • More detail on duration of PMRAFs, beams involved, etc. • Relationship to upstream IMF orientation Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  23. Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  24. FTEs (McWilliams et al., 2004) IMF By • FTEs observed at Geotail only under certain IMF conditions (+By and +Bz). • SuperDARN transients suggest FTEs occurred at all times, regardless of IMF orientation. IMF Bz Geotail SuperDARN PMRAFs Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  25. Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  26. Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  27. Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  28. Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

  29. Physics & Engineering Physics, University of Saskatchewan

More Related