1 / 28

Monitoring and evaluation:

Monitoring for the Elimination of Iodine Deficiency -Introduction of the framework- Moldova – April 2004 - Arnold Timmer UNICEF Regional Office. Monitoring and evaluation:. The reasons for monitoring The type and quality of information to collect Data collection methods

Download Presentation

Monitoring and evaluation:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Monitoring for the Elimination of Iodine Deficiency-Introduction of the framework-Moldova – April 2004 -Arnold TimmerUNICEF Regional Office

  2. Monitoring and evaluation: • The reasons for monitoring • The type and quality of information to collect • Data collection methods • Who collects, processes and uses the information • Sustainability aspects • Considerations in selecting the indicator, method and frequency

  3. Monitoring • Regular monitoring of the intervention provides feed back about the functioning and impact of the intervention • Allows us to know in the course of implementation where we are in reaching our goal • Allows us to modify the intervention where needed

  4. Why Monitor? • Ensure that people receive the supplement/fortified food at the correct level (safe and compliant with government standards) over an appropriate period of time • Ensure coverage of those at highest risk (achieving and sustaining it)

  5. Why Monitor? • Ensure, improve and sustain the functioning of the intervention. For example: • Adequate attention to logistics of intervention (e.g. delivering iodized salt) • Make stakeholders (health workers, community organizations, target groups, food producers, government) aware about the importance of iodine deficiency and what needs to be done • Reduce recurring costs (increase efficiency and sustainability)

  6. Why Monitor? • Ensure that the intervention is achieving its goal: sustained change in iodine status in the target population

  7. For example,Monitoring helps you to: • Identify geographic areas or population groups not covered by the iodization program • Identify problem points in the iodization program e.g. production, distribution, price, acceptance • Ensure safety, that the iodine content of salt is within the desired range • Conclude that the iodine status is improving!!

  8. An incomplete Monitoring System does not tell you much! Information on impact needs to be complemented with information on the process

  9. Key Questions in Monitoring • Is the intervention functioning adequately? • Is iodized salt available in sufficient amounts? • Is quality assurance in place and functioning? • Is the communication program in place and functioning?

  10. Key Questions in Monitoring • Is the intervention available, affordable and acceptable? • Does the user have access to iodized salt and is it affordable and acceptable?

  11. Key Questions in Monitoring • Is the intervention being used by the target group? • Measures the coverage: • What percent of the target population uses iodized salt?

  12. Key Questions in Monitoring • How has the micronutrient status improved in the (target) population? • What is the iodine status in the target population?

  13. Purposes for monitoring • Programme management: • magnitude of the problem • effectiveness of each activity • Impact: progress toward the goal • Advocacy: • political commitment (cost of iodine deficiency, magnitude of the problem) • Evaluation of (aspects of) interventions • External relations: media, donor reporting • Research

  14. Steps of an Intervention • Problem identification ...what is the problem? • Strategy development ...what can we do? • Advocacy and commitment building …we have to do something about it! • Put the intervention in place … let’sdo it! • Develop a system to monitor process and impact …how effective is it, at what effort?

  15. Salt Iodization • Production/importation • Distribution and sales • Consumption

  16. Developing the framework • What are the key questions you want to answer • Indicators • Who monitors • Frequency • Method of collection • Information to be reported

  17. Key Questions -example • What proportion of households uses iodized salt: • Are all areas and population groups equally covered? • Is the salt adequately iodized: • At production/import level • At household level • Is the population aware of iodized salt • What % of salt at production level meets the standard? • What is the iodine status in the population? • What is the price difference between iodized and non-iodized salt? • Do concerns exist about the use of iodized salt (public and food companies)?

  18. Salt Iodization: possible indicators • Production/importation • iodine content in salt • packaging/storage conditions • Distribution and sales • iodine content salt at wholesale, retail level • storage conditions • price • quality/effectiveness of training/communication • Consumption • Presence of iodized salt in household • Awareness about iodized salt • iodine in urine

  19. Salt Iodization: who monitors • Production/importation • internal (by company itself): • iodine content salt • procedures • packaging/storage conditions • quality/effectiveness of training/communication • external (by government): • iodine content salt • procedures • packaging/storage conditions • inspection of compliance with law and regulations • quality/effectiveness of training/communication

  20. Salt Iodization: frequency • Production/importation • internal (by company itself): • iodine content salt every hour • procedures monthly • packaging/storage conditions daily/monthly • quality/effectiveness of training/communication annual • external (by government): • iodine content salt monthly • procedures annual • packaging/storage conditions annual • inspection of compliance with law and regulations monthly • quality/effectiveness of training/communication annual

  21. Salt Iodization: method • Production/importation • internal (by company itself): • iodine content salt test kit/titration • procedures observation • packaging/storage conditions observation • quality/effectiveness of training/communication questionnaire • external (by government): • iodine content salt test kit/titration • procedures document review • packaging/storage conditions observation • inspection of compliance with law and regulations document review • quality/effectiveness of training/communication survey

  22. Salt Iodization: information reported • Production/importation • internal (by company itself): • Amount of non-iodised and iodised food grade salt produced/imported/ exported and distributed in the country (total and proportion of total) • % of iodised salt samples/batches complying to national standards (within set range or above minimum level mg/Kg) • QA and QC procedures for salt iodisation • Labeling, packaging and storage procedures and conditions • external (by government): • % of iodised salt samples/batches complying to national standards (within set range or above minimum level mg/Kg) • QA and QC procedures for salt iodisation • Labeling, packaging and storage procedures and conditions

  23. Example: Salt Iodization Is the intervention functioning adequately? Determine what you need to know and why Determine how to collect the information Determine the frequency of data collection Question Indicator Method Who collects Frequency Is iodized salt available in sufficient quantity? Amount iodized salt imported and distributed Reports from industry, sales data Salt companies importers and distributors; MoCommerce On-going

  24. Group work 1. Describe minimum monitoring system needed 2. Describe the existing monitoring system 3. Identify gaps, weaknesses, and suggestions for improvement

  25. Group work 1. Describe minimum monitoring system needed: • List all the information you require and for each: • At what level will the information be collected? • Who should collect it? • How often does the information need to be collected? • What is the method of collection? • What should be reported and to whom? • How will the information be used and who is the user?

  26. Group work 2. Describe the existing monitoring system: • List all the information that is collected and for each: • Where is the information collected? • Who collects it? • How often is the information collected? • What is reported and to whom? • How is the information used and who is the user?

  27. Group work 3. Identify gaps, weaknesses and suggestions for improvement

  28. Example: • What: Iodine in salt: • where: at factory level • who: by the factory itself and external control by SES • to whom and what: information reported to SES; total amount of edible salt produced for domestic market, total amount of edible iodized salt produced, % of samples (in)adequately iodized • frequency: continuous, every hour • how used: information will be used to guarantee that iodized salt is produced of good and required quality, providing adequate iodine to the consumer

More Related