1 / 28

Fatima Jinnah Women University (FJWU)

Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC) A Landmark Initiative of Higher Education Commission (HEC) for Quality Assurance in Teaching and Research at Higher Degree Level. Fatima Jinnah Women University (FJWU). Rawalpindi. Establishment. July 2007. HR: Budgeted Posts.

herb
Download Presentation

Fatima Jinnah Women University (FJWU)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Quality Enhancement Cell (QEC)A Landmark Initiative of Higher Education Commission (HEC) for Quality Assurance in Teaching and Research at Higher Degree Level Fatima Jinnah Women University (FJWU) Rawalpindi

  2. Establishment July 2007

  3. HR: Budgeted Posts • Director: Prof. Dr. Naheed Zia Khan Supervision, planning & technical advice • Deputy Director: Ms. Fareena Iqbal Liaison with academic Departments • Assistant Director:Ms. Nosheen Naz Data processing and statistical output • Data Analyst:Vacant • Assistant:Mr. Ayaz Ahmed Khan General and technical logistics • Naib Qasid: Mr. Adnan

  4. Update on QEC Progress • Assessment Teams (AT) for all 16 academic depts. formed • Schedule chalked out for AT visit of the depts. • Evaluation of courses offered in Summer 2009 • SAR of Model Department, Computer Sciences, in the 11th Meeting of QECs • AT visit of the Model Department, Computer Sciences, on August 12 2008 - minutes sent

  5. Continued… • Proforma 1, 10, 3, 4, & 5, submitted, for all courses for Winter/Spring Semester 2009 • SARs of all degree programs, 16 years of schooling, completed and reviewed • Proforma 11, added: to proformas provided by QAA for review of working of different Administrative Departments

  6. Continued… • Evaluation shifted to machine readable Proforma, scanned by Scranton ES 2800: economizing on paper, HR and making the data more error free • Comprehensive Evaluation Report in the next quarter would be compiled and circulated in four weeks • FJWU joined World Higher Education Database 2009: info can be accessed via WHED 2009 • Criteria referenced Self Assessment Proforma circulated in all 16 Academic Departments • Four Proforma have been received, analyzed and compiled

  7. Dept. of Business Administration

  8. Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1+ S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 = 4 +15 + 5 + 8 + 11+12 + 6 + 4 = 65

  9. Dept. of Public Administration

  10. Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7+ S8 = 4 + 18 + 1 + 9 + 14 + 14 + 7 + 6 = 73

  11. Dept. of Computer Sciences

  12. Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1 + S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 = 4 + 18 + 8 + 8 + 12 + 11 + 5 + 4 = 70

  13. Dept. of Education

  14. Continued… Overall Assessment Score = S1+ S2 + S3 + S4 + S5 + S6 + S7 + S8 = 5 + 18 + 4 + 10 + 14 + 15 + 8 + 8 = 83

  15. Implementation Plan • Assessment Team visit of Public Administration, August 13 2009; and minutes of AT • Corrective action - Implementation Plan

  16. Corrective Actions on Assessment

  17. Continued…

  18. Continued…

  19. Continued… • Workshops held by QEC for Revisiting the Grading Spread, implementation has taken place in this quarter. Standard Normal Distribution

  20. Action Plan for Next Quarter • AT visit for Business Administration, Communication Sciences and Education - for next quarter • Comprehensive Report for Summer Semester 2009 • Pro forma 1 & 10 - planned for Fall 2009 - all courses except of Ph.D. • Pro forma 7 & 8, Alumni and Employer - for Fall 2009, (better response?)

  21. Continued… • Proposal for collaboration with Dept. of Quality Assurance, NUST, in progress: • One day workshop on Teacher Performance Evaluation: Significance and Constraints • Need Assessment for Teachers’ Performance Evaluation • Group Work on Constraints • Panelists: Eminent Teachers, QEC heads • Invitees: QAA reps, QEC reps & eminent teachers • Initiating evaluation for semester Fall 2009

  22. Submitted: Annexure • Copy of the letter sent to the Vice Chancellor for approval of the Assessment Team for Model Department, Department of Computer Sciences (Annex. 1); • Copy of the letter sent to the external member of Assessment Team, Dr. Younis Javed (Annex. 2); • Copy of the minutes of Assessment Team visit and meeting (Annex. 3); • Copy of the letter sent to the Vice Chancellor for approval of the Assessment Team for Model Department, Department of Public Administration (Annex. 4); • Copy of the letter sent to the external member of Assessment Team, Mr. Imran Hameed (Annex. 5);

  23. Continued… • Copy of IOMs for Assessment Teams from all Departments (Annex. 6); • Copy of suggested Schedule for Assessment Teams for the next Quarter (Annex. 7); • Copy of Schedule of Summer Semester 2009 Evaluation (Annex. 8); • Copy of Performa 11, Employer Survey (Annex. 9) • Copy of filled Criteria Referenced Self Assessment proforma from four Departments; (Annex. 10); • Copy of Machine Readable proforma 1and 10 (Annex. 11); • Copy of letter to Air Commodore Ismail for Collaborative Activity with NUST (Annex. 12); • Copy of letter of Implementation of Revisited Grading Spread (Annex. 13); • Copy of Implementation plan of Department of Public Administration (Annex. 14);

  24. Submitted: Compiled Reports • SAR: Dept. of PA • Survey: Comprehensive Evaluation Report for Winter/Spring, 2009: • Proforma 1 • Proforma 10 • Proforma 3 • Proforma 4 • Proforma 5

  25. Thank You

More Related