1 / 18

Mike Loghides, Airport Program Administrator Clark County Department of Aviation

New Southern Nevada Airport Airspace Design, Standard Instrument Arrival Procedures, and Standard Instrument Departures Briefing for Federal Land Managers September 2005. Mike Loghides, Airport Program Administrator Clark County Department of Aviation mikelo@mccarran.com. Introduction.

hinto
Download Presentation

Mike Loghides, Airport Program Administrator Clark County Department of Aviation

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. New Southern Nevada AirportAirspace Design, Standard Instrument Arrival Procedures, and Standard Instrument DeparturesBriefing for Federal Land ManagersSeptember 2005 Mike Loghides, Airport Program Administrator Clark County Department of Aviation mikelo@mccarran.com

  2. Introduction • Project Background • Study Objective • Scope of Work • Stakeholder Participation • Preliminary Design Alternatives for EIS

  3. Clark County Project Team • Clark County Department of Aviation • Mike Loghides [mikelo@mccarran.com; (702) 261-5750] • Ricondo & Associates • Tom Cornell [tcornell@ricondo.com; (415) 547-1930] • John Bergener [jbergener@ricondo.com; (702) 265-3442] • ASRC Aerospace • Robb Varani [rvarani@akspace.com; (763) 786-9582] • Shaun Meehan [shaun.meehan@akspace.com (763) 786-3827]

  4. Project Background • Determination of need for additional airport • Selection of new site • Land availability • Airspace feasibility assessment • Conceptual planning • Airport layout plan • Utility planning • Airspace design • Environmental impact statement • Design and construction • Other planning and feasibility studies

  5. Preliminary Airport Conceptual Design

  6. Objectives of Study • Develop airspace and procedures through cooperation with potential stakeholders • Identify airspace interactions between facilities • Identify existing and future air traffic constraints • Establish airspace assumptions for analysis in the EIS

  7. Airspace Simulation Modeling • Potential airspace designs will be modeled using the Total Airport and Airspace Modeler (TAAM); TAAM can provide: • Visual verification of SIDS, STARS, and airspace and procedures interface • Capacity and delay comparisons between airspace design alternatives • It is important to note that TAAM • is not a 3D SID or STAR builder • is not a human-in-the-loop simulation • is not a design tool • Potential follow-on modeling with NASA Future Flight

  8. Stakeholder Participation • FAA • Western Pacific Regional Office (AT, AFS, AVN, ANI) • Airport District Office • Flight Standards District Office • LAS TRACON and ATCT • Los Angeles ARTCC • Military • Regional liaison • Branches of military utilizing airspace in the vicinity including Nellis AFB and R-2508 Complex • Industry • Airlines • NBAA • AOPA • Manufacturers (avionics and aircraft) • RTCA Working Group • Resource agencies including BLM and NPS • CCDOA Team

  9. Work Completed to Date • Data collection and acquisition of SOP’s and LOA’s • Creation of existing conditions base map • Initial stakeholder coordination • Preliminary arrival and departure corridor development through a series of working group and stakeholder meetings • Airspace conceptual designs for EIS process

  10. Assumptions for Airspace Environment • Mojave Preserve restrictions • TACAN to be installed at airport • New RADAR(s) to be implemented • Precision instrument landing approaches to each runway • Use of RNAV capabilities • Airspace realignments with ZLA, L30, and LSV (new sectors, control positions, new delegated terminal airspace)

  11. 1B-1: Land 19R & 25L/Depart 19L & 25R

  12. 1B-1: Land 19R & 25L/Depart 19L & 25R

  13. 1B-2: Land 01 L/R; Depart 07L

  14. 1B-3: Depart 01 L/R; Land 01L & 25L

  15. 1B-4 & 6: Land 07 L/R or 19 L/R; Depart 07 L/R

  16. 1B-5: Land & Depart 19 L/R

  17. Next Steps • Airspace modeling (TAAM) • TERPS analysis • Development of preliminary SIDs, STARs, and approaches • NAVAID coverage assessment • RADAR coverage analysis • Airspace conceptual design

More Related