1 / 27

SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT

SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT. Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University. PART-II. Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010. SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT. SYSTEMIC LEARNING OUTCOMES. AFFECTIVE. COGNATIVE. SKILLS. Requirements for building

hugh
Download Presentation

SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT Workshop Faculty of science Menofia University PART-II Prof.A.F.M.FAHMY January 2010

  2. SYSTEMIC ASSESSMENT SYSTEMIC LEARNING OUTCOMES AFFECTIVE COGNATIVE SKILLS

  3. Requirements for building Systemic Assessment -Content analysis of the course unites into concepts, and their related knowledge, skills, attitudes. -Determinations of the types of relations between the given concepts. • -Determination of the size of the building • systemics[ Trigonal- Quadrilateral- ……]

  4. V-Systemic Matching Questions [SMQ, s] -Measure the student's ability to find the relationship between a set of similar items, each of which has two components, and their relation ships, and arrange them in a given systemic.

  5. Disadvantage: - Do not allow instructors to measure students' writing skills. -Advantages: - Reduces the effects of guessing -Highly reliable exam scores. - Short reading and response time, allowing more content to be included in a given set of SMQ, s. ,

  6. Guide lines for Writing SMQ,s. 1-The items in the left (Column A) are usually called premises and assigned numbers (1, 2, 3, etc.). 2-The items in the right (Column B) are called responses and designated by capital letters (A,B,C etc). . - ,

  7. 3-The arrangement of premises, and responses are in a given systemic diagram (Column C, in the middle ) 4- All of the premises and responses for a matching item should appear on the same page with the given systemic diagram. ,

  8. A C B X Y Z E E F G A B C D F Choose concepts from column (A) & Relations from From column (B) to build the correct systemic in column (C): . , ILO: Synthesis

  9. Example- (Chem): Choose Compounds from column (A) & Reaction conditionsFrom column (B) to build the correct systemic in column (C): . ,

  10. VI-Systemic Sequencing Questions:[SSQ,s] • -SSQ,s require the student to position • text or formula, or events • in a given sequence in a systemic. • - To reduce guessing use large size systemics • [pentagonal,hexagonal,..]. • ,

  11. Disadvantage - Do not allow instructors to measure students' writing skills. • Advantages • - Reduces the effects of guessing. • - Highly reliable exam scores. • ,

  12. -60 --30 ( ) -30 x 5 -60 120 60 A) -30 ( ) -30 150 30 x 5 Example 1 : [Math.]: Put the following numbers in the correct sequence in the following systemic diagram:30,60,120,150 ILO: Synthesis

  13. Example 2 : [Chem.]: Put the iron and its compounds in the right places in the following systemic diagram:Fe, FeCI2, FeCI3, Fe2(SO4)3, HCl gas Mg ( ) Conc. H2SO4 HCl gas Fe FeCl2 A) Mg ( ) Air/ heat Fe2( SO4)3 FeCl3 Conc. H2SO4 Air/ heat ILO: Synthesis

  14. VII-Synthesize Systemic relations between concepts, facts, issues, Requires the Student toPosition concepts or formulas, or events or issues ,numbers and their relations in a systemic diagram ,

  15. Disadvantage - Do not allow instructors to measure students' writing skills. Advantages - Can measure various kinds of knowledge, including students' ability to correlate between concepts, formula, or events. ,

  16. -Can assess higher-order thinking skills. -Reduces the effects of guessing. -Highly reliable Questions scores.

  17. ÷ 100 50 A-I) -50 ( ) 25+ 150 75 X 2 +25 75 100 A-II) 2÷ ( ) ÷2 150 50 +100 Example-1 : [Math.]: Build a correct systemic shows the numerical relations between the following numbers: 50, 75,100,150:

  18. HCl gas Fe FeCl2 A) Mg ( ) Air/ heat Fe2( SO4)3 FeCl3 Conc. H2SO4 Example-2 : [Chem.]: Build a systemic diagram Shows the correct chemical relations between; Fe FeCI2, FeCI3, Fe2(SO4)3:

  19. VIII-Analyze Systemic to its Components Requires the Student to Analyze the givensystemic diagram to its concepts or formula, numbers, or events with their relations.

  20. Disadvantage - Do not allow instructors to measure students writing skills. Advantages - Reduces the effects of guessing. - Highly reliable Questions scores. - Can assess higher-order thinking skills in which students are able to analyze, synthesize.

  21. 100 50 -50 ( ) 25+ 150 75 X 2 Example- : [Math.]: Analyze the following numerical systemic into mathematical relations: ÷50 + 25 = 7 5 150 - 50 = 100 75 X 2 = 150 2 = 50÷ 100 A) ILO: Analysis

  22. IX-Complete Systemics Requires the Student to Complete the Systemic Diagram with the given missing concepts or formula,numbers or events and/or relations.

  23. Advantages - Reduces the effects of guessing. - Highly reliable Questions scores. - Can assess higher-order thinking skills in which students are able to analyze, synthesize.

  24. Example : [Chem.]: Complete the following systemic diagram by using the Following compounds to give correct systemic:, FeCI2, Fe2(SO4)3,FeCl3 HCl gas HCl gas Fe Fe FeCl2 b) a) Mg Mg ( ) ( ) Air/ heat Air/ heat Fe2( SO4)3 FeCl3 Conc. H2SO4 Conc. H2SO4

  25. References: 1-Fahmy, A. F. M., Lagowski, J. J; Systemic Reform in Chemical Education , An International Perspective, J. Chem. Edu., 2003, 80 (9), 1078 . 2-Fahmy, A.F. M., Lagowski, J. J., Using SATL Techniques to Assess Student Achievement, [18th ICCE, Istanbul Turkey, 3-8, August 2004]. 3-ahmy, A.F. M., Lagowski, J. J.,” Systemic multiple choice questions (SMCQs) in Chemistry “[19th ICCE, Seoul, South Korea, 12-17 August 2006]. 4-Fahmy, A.F. M., Lagowski, J. J , “Systemic Problem solving [SPS] to Assess Student Achievement in Chemistry”[42 IUPAC Congress, 2-7 Aug.2009] 5-Colleen M. and Bull, J.; Workshop on designing objective test questions. CAA center (http://caacenter.ac.uk/ university of luton, luton UK.

  26. 6-Writing Multiple Choice Items which Require Comprehension by Russell A. Dewey, PhD http://www.psychwww.com/selfquiz/aboutq.htm 7-McMillan, J. H. (2001). Classroom assessment Principles and practice for effective instruction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. . 8- http://web.utk.edu/~mccay/apdm/match/match_b.htm

  27. Thank you

More Related