140 likes | 361 Views
Innovation in the Supply Chain: lessons from the CBI/QinetiQ Innovation Survey. Hugh Morgan Williams Chairman, Canford Group Vice Chair, CBI SME Council. High revenue. Medium revenue. Low revenue. Overall. % turnover on innovation. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70. Main Findings.
E N D
Innovation in the Supply Chain: lessons from the CBI/QinetiQ Innovation Survey Hugh Morgan WilliamsChairman, Canford GroupVice Chair, CBI SME Council
High revenue Medium revenue Low revenue Overall % turnover on innovation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Main Findings Business Models and Processes Products and Services Equal Focus
High revenue Medium revenue Low revenue Main Findings Business Models and Processes Products and Services Equal Focus Smaller Companies % turnover on innovation 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Internal profits 94% Gov’t grants & initiatives 25% Innovation partners 17% Banks 17% Equity 7% 6% Venture capital 5% Other Funding for Innovation Funding sources Ease of accessing external finance for innovation 23% 31% 15% 27% Veryeasy Balance = -31% Overall Veryhard Fairlyeasy Fairlyhard Neutral/Don’t know 4% Smaller companies Balance = -39% 27% 31% 15% 27% 27% 32% 12% Veryeasy 2%
Future trend 1 4 2 3 5 63% companies agree stronger links with academia would boost their competitive advantage External Collaboration Effectiveness of collaborationwith external partner Most frequent Least effective Most effective 85% Companies in thesupply chain 77% Universities 75% Consultants 67% Companies not in thesupply chain 40% Government researchinstitutes Least often 40 % 20 60 -40 0 -20 CBI/QinetiQ Innovation Survey 2005
Managing Innovation All Respondents Smaller Companies 80% Larger Companies Supply Chain Collaborators 60% 40% 20% Involve Customers/Suppliers Monitor Failure Reward Employees Formal Ideas Process Provide Resources Market Assessment
SME Balance Balance +58% +57% Macroeconomic stability +18% +23% Intellectual Property policy +16% +16% Environmental legislation +3% -8% Health & Safety legislation +1% -9% Education policy -9% -12% -20% -25% Transport policy -20% -30% Procurement practices -28% -35% Planning policy -35% Business tax -46% -42% Employment legislation -45% Government Influence on Business Innovation Hinders Neutral Helps Corporate governance policy -80 -60 -40 -20 0% 20 40 60 80
SME Balance Balance +58% +57% Macroeconomic stability +18% +23% Intellectual Property policy +16% +16% Environmental legislation +3% -8% Health & Safety legislation +1% -9% Education policy -9% -12% -20% -25% Transport policy -20% -30% Procurement practices -28% -35% Planning policy -35% Business tax -46% -42% Employment legislation -45% Government Influence on Business Innovation • Areas for improvement • More and better S & T technicians and graduates • Widen and increase level of the R&D tax credit • Use procurement more strategically • Fund more applied R&D Hinders Neutral Helps Corporate governance policy -80 -60 -40 -20 0% 20 40 60 80
Why Procurement Matters £90m/yr £300m/yr £ billion/year CBI/QinetiQ Procurement & Innovation report 2006
Balance (help - hinder) -31% -32% -7% Do Government Procurement Practices Help or Hinder Your Own Innovation Activity? Hinders Neutral Helps Supplier to central government Supplier to local government Not a supplier CBI/QinetiQ Procurement & Innovation report 2006
Do Government Procurement Practices Help or Hinder Your Own Innovation Activity? Who is being hindered? Hinders Neutral Helps 30% Larger firms Supplier to central government 41%Firms with <500 staff Supplier to local government Not a supplier CBI/QinetiQ Procurement & Innovation report 2006
Companies Reporting the Most Strongly Unfavourable Views on Government Procurement (%) Small companies consistently report more unfavourable views CBI/QinetiQ Procurement & Innovation report 2006
A New Approach to Stimulating Innovation: Recommendations • Introduce innovation incentives and stretch targets in public procurement • Make outcome-based procurement a reality • Procurement on the basis of value • Take a rational approach to IP rights • Learn and adapt • Develop an ‘ARPA’ for the UK
Conclusions • Smaller companies are committed innovators • Extra support for b2b collaboration • Regulatory Impact Assessments must be improved to weed out adverse affects on SMEs • Government must become an early adopter of new ideas to support the development of competitive supply chains