320 likes | 482 Views
CITY OF TSHWANE USDG 2011/12 Achievements USDG 2012/13 Plans. Presented by: Amos Mboweni.
E N D
CITY OF TSHWANE USDG 2011/12 Achievements USDG 2012/13 Plans Presented by: Amos Mboweni
THE OUTCOME STATEMENT OF THE GRANTTo ensure that Metropolitan and Secondary Cities have more efficiently managed built environment that:- Promotes the creation of Sustainable Human Settlements that - Promote human dignity and wealth.
USDG OUTPUTS OUTPUT 1: Households upgraded through housing ProgrammesOUTPUT 2: Households with access to basic services such as water, Sewerage, Electricity, and Refuse RemovalOUTPUT 3: Land availability, purchasing, acquisition, planning, titlingOUTPUT 4: Number of Jobs Created through output 1, 2 and 3 above.
Summary of 2011/12 USDG • The total USDG funding R891,080,000.00 • Total USDG spending for 2011/2012 R880,963,077.00 • Total spending for 4th quarter R583,549,025.00 • Funds to be rolled over to 2012/13 R10,117,923.00 • 98,86% OF USDG GRANT HAS BEEN USED DURING THE 2011/2012 FINANCIAL YEAR
List of Projects per department Agriculture and environmental management
List of Projects per department Housing and Sustainable Human Settlements
List of Projects per department Water and Sanitation and electricity
List of Projects per department Roads and Transport
List of Projects per department Roads and Transport continuation
List of Projects per department Sport, Recreation, Art & Culture
List of Projects per department Other Projects
Summary of non-delivered areas Main reasons for non-delivery: The Grant was introduced late to the Municipalities, resulting in delays in the supply chain management process.
STOCKPILING AREA – Some of the stock pile will be used to fill & level the soccer ground for the community
CLEALY MARKED ROAD CLOSURES FOR SAFETY PURPOSESPROJECT INFORMATION SIGNAGE ON MAIN ROAD
JOB CREATED • 57 Local employees 14 females 23 youth • 11 core employees • 11 salaried staff • 5 Local sub-contractors 2 female 3 youth 40 local employees employed by the local sub-contractors.
Challenges with merging of funds • The MIG Cities Grant was and still is directed towards the eradication of backlogs in previously disadvantaged areas. • The primary focus on the USDG is on formalising the informal settlements, but the eradication of backlogs (roads and storm water) in those areas which existed in 1994, would continue. • The narrative and wording in the DoRA is overweight in the direction of the formalisation side. • The present rate of budgeting need to be revised. • Clearly highlighted in any revisions to the DoRA, as it creates major strive between Departments presently.
Challenges Procurement & Designs There are three major reasons why the projects could not have been finished by end of June 2012. • Number One: The appointment of contractors took over 7 months due to the massive response received from the Market. • Number two: The approval on the final services designs to enable the construction were only received by end of February 2012. • Number three: Appointment of Community Liaison Officers and local labour was contested heavily amongst the various communities. • The above have now been resolved
Remedial actions • Develop and strengthen partnerships • Complete all unfinished work • Improve efficiency • Stakeholder focus • Risk management • Job creation • Implementation enablers
BEPP 2012/13 References: • Updated IDP 2011-2016 • Sustainable Human Settlement Plan (SHSP 2012) • SDIBP 2012/13 • BEPP 2012/13