1 / 6

Planning CLIC MBQ stabilisation for the test modules

Planning CLIC MBQ stabilisation for the test modules. CLIC MBQ Stabilisation is still in full R&D phase: i.e. There is NO FINAL DESIGN YET for the stabilisation in the test module. It is hence of little use to make component lists etc now. 2011 : q1+q2 Installation of type1 module

isleen
Download Presentation

Planning CLIC MBQ stabilisation for the test modules

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning CLIC MBQ stabilisation for the test modules CLIC MBQ Stabilisation is still in full R&D phase: i.e. There is NO FINAL DESIGN YET for the stabilisation in the test module. It is hence of little use to make component lists etc now. 2011 : q1+q2 Installation of type1 module q3+q4 Installation of type 4 module 2010 : 4 steps toward demonstration on MBQ type 4 (+ type 1)

  2. CERN option: Steps toward performance demonstration 1. Stabilisation single d.o.f. with small weight (“membrane”) First result: This is not a TMC table... Study and tests now ongoing for improvements: Improve controllers, filters, resolution, mechanics... 1.2 nm Combinations of feedback and feedforward

  3. CERN option: Steps toward performance demonstration 2. Stabilisation single d.o.f. with type 1 weight (“tripod”) 2 passive feet actuator S. Janssens Preliminary result Will be improved : • Optimise controller design • (Tuning, Combine feedback with feedforward) Expected • Improve resolution (actuator, DAQ) • Avoid low frequency resonances in structure and contacts • Noise budget on each step, • ADC and DAC noise

  4. CERN option: Steps toward performance demonstration 3.Stabilisation two d.o.f. with type 1 quadrupole weight (“tripod”) 3a. Inclined leg with flexural joints Status: Launch first prototype flexural hinges Goal: start tests March 2010 3b. Two inclined legs with flexural joints y Status: Modelling x Goal: start tests May 2010 3c. Add a spring guidance Load compensation (Status: start design) Precision guidance Reduce degrees of freedom Reduce stress on piezo 3d. Test equivalent load/leg

  5. CERN option: Steps toward performance demonstration 4. Stabilisation of type 4 (and type 1)CLIC MB quadrupole proto type • Lessons learnt step 1 to 3 • Results Tests 1 to 3 • Cost analysis • (number of legs= cost driver) Design for the 4 types • # degrees of freedom • Stress and dynamic analysis Goal: start assembly and testing on type 4 prototype summer 2010 • Range nano-positioning • Resolution Results autumn 2010

  6. Tentative planning Remarks: • Stabilisation is in R&D phase. Feasibility demonstration has priority over integration in module. • Outcome from tests will lead to decisions about different versions with updated technical solutions. • This can mean that in the test module there might be different versions and upgrades for the stabilisation. • Before validation of choices (i.e. LVPZT or HVPZT), a grouped purchase is not possible: complicated tender. • Strategy: first catalogue products to test, then optimised customised product. (optimised for resolution, size, cost,…)

More Related