140 likes | 322 Views
n 型ドープ GaAs 量子細線の 発光および発光励起スペクトル測定. 東京大学物性研究所 ,CREST ( JST ) ,Bell Lab 井原章之 , 早水裕平 , 吉田正裕 , 秋山英文 , Loren N.Pfeiffer,Ken W.West. 1、 introduction 2、 sample 3、 PL and PLE of wire. 4、 electron density dependence 5、 wire / arm well 6、 Theory 7、 conclusion and problems. introduction.
E N D
n型ドープGaAs量子細線の発光および発光励起スペクトル測定n型ドープGaAs量子細線の発光および発光励起スペクトル測定 東京大学物性研究所,CREST(JST),Bell Lab 井原章之,早水裕平,吉田正裕,秋山英文, Loren N.Pfeiffer,Ken W.West 1、introduction 2、sample 3、PL and PLE of wire 4、electron density dependence 5、wire / arm well 6、Theory 7、conclusion and problems
introduction Low dimensional electron system Fermi Edge Singularity in 1D system ? 1D Luttinger Liquid ? Electron density dependence of Photoluminescence (PL) and PL Excitation (PLE) Spectra in an n-type doped 1D Quantum Wire
sample • grown by CEO with MBE • stem electron density 1×1011 cm-2 • Gate Voltage(Vg) 0.0~0.8V • wire density 0~4×105 cm-1 • arm density 0~1.3×1011 cm-2 • Temperature 5K (Liquid He)
PL and PLE of wire PLE ~ same information with absorption spectrum LH:light hole HH:heavy hole Vg=0.15V wire HH PLE arm LH stem LH arm HH PL stem HH Photon Energy (eV)
electron density dependence PL PLE BE FE ? H 0.7V 0.3V (arb. units) 0.6V 0.2V 0.5V ω1 density 0.15V 0.4V n1D 0.35V 0.1V ω2 0.3V L FES 0.0V
Trion Binding Energy PL PLE 0.15V (arb. units) ω1 ω2 excitation 0.1V EB ~2meV EB 2.33meV 2.04meV 1.97meV 0.0V
PLE peak shift and PL width PL PLE ? ω2 Fermi Edge (70% height) ω1 Band Edge (70% height)
wire / arm wire PL PLE ω2 Fermi Edge (70%) ω1 Band Edge (70%) ω2 ω1 ω2 FE ω1 1.5meV BE arm
Theory wire (ω2ーω1) How does FES change with EF ? Peak shift EB ~2meV (ω2ーω1) arm (ω2ーω1) Line shape ~1.5meV EB
Conclusion and problems We succeed to get electron density dependence of 1D PLE which differs from 2D PLE !! • Monolayer fluctuation ? • High electron density ? • Higher binding energy ? • Lower temperature ? We are just doing the process of new samples !!
data ~1.5meV
data EF arm EF wire (meV) (meV) 1.8 1.8 1.5 1.5 1.1 1.1 0.8 0.8 0.5 0.5 0.2 0.2 V. Huard et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 187