110 likes | 226 Views
GEOSS AIP-5 Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 5 Disasters Preparedness & Mitigation Session. Hervé Caumont - Session Lead - OGC IP Team AIP-5 Kick-off Meeting May 3 rd , 2012. Session agenda. Co-lead introduces the session (5 minutes) Repeat of one chart from opening plenary
E N D
GEOSS AIP-5Architecture Implementation Pilot, Phase 5Disasters Preparedness & Mitigation Session Hervé Caumont - Session Lead - OGC IP Team AIP-5 Kick-off Meeting May 3rd, 2012
Session agenda • Co-lead introduces the session (5 minutes) • Repeat of one chart from opening plenary • List of responses relevant to session • Self introductions of persons in the session (5 minutes) / Participants list: • Liping Di / GMU CSISS • Meixia Deng / GMU CSISS • Peter Chung / GIS FCU • Sneha Rao / CIESIN • Robert Thomas / Compusult • Joan Maso / CREAF • Hervé Caumont / OGC • Lucia Lovison / OGC • Lawrence McGovern (INCOSE) • Oliver Clements / PML • Angel Palomares / ATOS • Stuart Frye / NASA • Jeff dlB / NOAA
Session agenda • Presentations by several primary participants (30 minutes) • Identify what problems you are aiming at • Emphasis on supported scenarios (steps of user tasks) and technical use cases (publish, find, bind, workflow...) • List the contributed services and datasets Presenters (5 minutes each) • Stuart Frye / NASA • Meixia Deng / GMU CSISS • Peter Chung / GIS FCU • SnehaRao / CIESIN • Robert Thomas / Compusult • (Herve proxy for) Matthias Muller / TUD-GLUES
Session agenda • Open Discussion (20 minutes) • For SBA/CoP sessions: Interactive development of Scenario application of use case • Coordinate with System Design work group (PoC Larry McGovern) regarding enterprise modeling • Develop a work plan for the topic: dates and actions (30 minutes) • Review and comment on AIP Master Schedule • Identify work group specific milestones • What is missing and still needed: service and data gaps • What would result in a paradigm shift to meeting our objectives rather than a simple evolutionary path.
Disasters Management Session - Responses Analysis • CIESIN (S,C,A) • Global- and regional-scale datasets related to disasters • Development of web-service oriented scenario and use case for Disasters Management (e.g. impacts of coastal storms and sea level rise in Central America) • Tools for before and after analysis of storm's landfall, Population Estimation Service, monitoring services the performance capabilities of typical traffic, client application • NASA (S,C,A) • Provision of high-resolution reference water mask at 15m resolution • User generation of disaster management (data) resources to be shared in an open source format (flood models, forecasts and flood extent maps) • Several satellites potentially tasked during the period • Single sign-on management for exchange of information across workflows (Pub/Sub) • Services: Campaign Manager, Notification Manager, Web Coverage Processing Server, Identity Server • CSISS (S,C) • GADMFS subsystem to be integrated into the Information Systems for Hydro-meteorological Extremes (incl. Floods and Droughts) - Global Agricultural Drought Monitoring and ForecastingSystem • TU Dresden GLUES (C,A) • Datasets on land use and climate change, support integrated environmental/climate modeling • Processing services for climate classification and spatio-temporal data aggregation • Time-aware visualization client (Time4Maps)
Disasters Management Session - Responses Analysis • GIS FCU (S,C) • Near real-time satellite information portal • Planning of satellite acquisitions / Estimated time of arrival for a specific area • Compusult (S,C) • Targeted GEOSS Disaster Management ‘community’ portal • Use of mobile Apps to display OGC services such as WMS and WMTS • Use of built-in sensors (GPS, camera, microphone, etc.) of mobile devices • Provide direct search capabilities of the CEOS WGISS Integrated Catalog (CWIC) • Ability to manage and track relevant information about an event or situation within individual Portfolios • PYXIS (C) • WorldView GeoWeb Client Application for use by decision-makers within the AIP-5 SBA scenario demonstrations • NASRDA (C) • Earth resources datasets from NigeriaSat medium and high resolution satellites • PML (C) • Routinely processed data from multiple polar orbiting satellites monitoring ocean parameters • UNEP Live (C) • TBC
Findings / Discussions • NASA Project in Namibia: the flood sensor web concept (workflow), CC platform Univ. Chicago (900 cores), • flood dashboard URL: http://matsu.opencloudconsortium.org/namibiaflood • WCPS for detections • CC capacity • GMU/CSISS GADMFS • On demand data access and processing • Forecasts and Event noticing through WNS when drought occurs • GIS FCU • use of AIP to consider options for further developments, including API • Any service URLs available yet ?
Findings / Discussions • CIESIN / DAAC EOSDIS • URLs: earthdata.nasa.gov/data/nrt-data/data-products • Service Population density / Flag for data quality (on CENSUS source assessment) • Use case scenario already proposed… • OpenLayers client • Compusult • Support integration of Real-time information, managing the process, online, nested portfolios (day 1 to n) • KML export, • System Modeling • Scenarios. “business” processes • Technical Use Cases, Functionalities • Capacity building • Document activities during AIP
Related GEO Tasks • DI-01-C1: Disaster Management Systems (Guy Seguin) • DI-01-C2: Geohazards Monitoring, Alert, and Risk Assessment • DI-01-C3: Tsunami Early Warning and Hazard Assessment • DI-01-C4: Global Wildland Fire Information System • DI-01-C5: Regional End-to-End Pilots (Stu Frye)
From GEO Work Plan symposium • Timely data dissemination • Improve process • Develop reliable network • Multi-hazard end-to-end approach • More integrated policies, decisions and actions • HFA, Hyogo Framework for Action • Building the resilience of nations &communities to disasters • Linkages with: • IN-01 in-situ weather network • SB-03 forest burn map • SB-04 impacts on urban areas • AG-01 Drought • Wa-01 Flooding